Pathways to Work for Low-Income Workers: The Effect of Work in the Temporary Help Industry

Julia Lane, Kelly S. Mikelson, Pat Sharkey, Doug Wissoker

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

This paper provides new evidence to inform the policy debate about the effect of a newly important industry-the temporary help industry-on the labor market outcomes of low-income workers and those workers who are at risk of being on public assistance. The core issue of whether temporary help work harms the long-term prospects of disadvantaged individuals depends critically on the alternatives available to the worker. Temporary employment results in labor market outcomes that are better than not working at all. For example, while nonemployed public assistance recipients have only a 35 percent chance of being employed a year later, those who were in temporary employment have almost twice the likelihood of being employed in the same period. These findings, if correct, would support the use of temporary agencies by welfare programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)581-598
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Policy Analysis and Management
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

temporary employment
low income
worker
industry
labor market
assistance
recipient
welfare
evidence
Industry
Low income
Pathway
Workers
Labor market outcomes
Temporary employment
Public assistance
Welfare programs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Pathways to Work for Low-Income Workers : The Effect of Work in the Temporary Help Industry. / Lane, Julia; Mikelson, Kelly S.; Sharkey, Pat; Wissoker, Doug.

In: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2003, p. 581-598.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{31bf9b5205dc443ab6a04abfb2c6e4d5,
title = "Pathways to Work for Low-Income Workers: The Effect of Work in the Temporary Help Industry",
abstract = "This paper provides new evidence to inform the policy debate about the effect of a newly important industry-the temporary help industry-on the labor market outcomes of low-income workers and those workers who are at risk of being on public assistance. The core issue of whether temporary help work harms the long-term prospects of disadvantaged individuals depends critically on the alternatives available to the worker. Temporary employment results in labor market outcomes that are better than not working at all. For example, while nonemployed public assistance recipients have only a 35 percent chance of being employed a year later, those who were in temporary employment have almost twice the likelihood of being employed in the same period. These findings, if correct, would support the use of temporary agencies by welfare programs.",
author = "Julia Lane and Mikelson, {Kelly S.} and Pat Sharkey and Doug Wissoker",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1002/pam.10156",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "581--598",
journal = "Journal of Policy Analysis and Management",
issn = "0276-8739",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pathways to Work for Low-Income Workers

T2 - The Effect of Work in the Temporary Help Industry

AU - Lane, Julia

AU - Mikelson, Kelly S.

AU - Sharkey, Pat

AU - Wissoker, Doug

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - This paper provides new evidence to inform the policy debate about the effect of a newly important industry-the temporary help industry-on the labor market outcomes of low-income workers and those workers who are at risk of being on public assistance. The core issue of whether temporary help work harms the long-term prospects of disadvantaged individuals depends critically on the alternatives available to the worker. Temporary employment results in labor market outcomes that are better than not working at all. For example, while nonemployed public assistance recipients have only a 35 percent chance of being employed a year later, those who were in temporary employment have almost twice the likelihood of being employed in the same period. These findings, if correct, would support the use of temporary agencies by welfare programs.

AB - This paper provides new evidence to inform the policy debate about the effect of a newly important industry-the temporary help industry-on the labor market outcomes of low-income workers and those workers who are at risk of being on public assistance. The core issue of whether temporary help work harms the long-term prospects of disadvantaged individuals depends critically on the alternatives available to the worker. Temporary employment results in labor market outcomes that are better than not working at all. For example, while nonemployed public assistance recipients have only a 35 percent chance of being employed a year later, those who were in temporary employment have almost twice the likelihood of being employed in the same period. These findings, if correct, would support the use of temporary agencies by welfare programs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2442529844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2442529844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pam.10156

DO - 10.1002/pam.10156

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:2442529844

VL - 22

SP - 581

EP - 598

JO - Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

JF - Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

SN - 0276-8739

IS - 4

ER -