Path-dependence of leveraged ETF returns

Marco Avellaneda, Stanley Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It is well known that leveraged exchange-traded funds (LETFs) do not reproduce the corresponding multiple of index returns over extended (quarterly or annual) investment horizons. For instance, in 2008 and early 2009, most LETFs underperformed the corresponding static strategies. In this paper, we study this phenomenon in detail. We give an exact formula linking the return of a leveraged fund with the corresponding multiple of the return of the unleveraged fund and its realized variance. This formula is tested empirically over quarterly horizons for 56 leveraged funds (44 double-leveraged and 12 triple-leveraged) using daily prices since January 2008 or since inception, according to the fund considered. The results indicate excellent agreement between the formula and the empirical data. The study also shows that leveraged funds can be used to replicate the returns of the underlying index, provided we use a dynamic rebalancing strategy. Empirically, we find that rebalancing frequencies required to achieve this goal are moderate-on the order of one week between rebalancings. Nevertheless, this need for dynamic rebalancing leads to the conclusion that LETFs as currently designed may be unsuitable for buy-and-hold investors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)586-603
Number of pages18
JournalSIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Path
Horizon
Realized Variance
Linking
Annual
Path dependence
Rebalancing
Strategy
Exchange traded funds

Keywords

  • ETFs
  • Leveraged ETFs
  • Volatility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Numerical Analysis
  • Finance

Cite this

Path-dependence of leveraged ETF returns. / Avellaneda, Marco; Zhang, Stanley.

In: SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2010, p. 586-603.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Avellaneda, Marco ; Zhang, Stanley. / Path-dependence of leveraged ETF returns. In: SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics. 2010 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 586-603.
@article{f68211cc92da4a62bf5b3e786db80d16,
title = "Path-dependence of leveraged ETF returns",
abstract = "It is well known that leveraged exchange-traded funds (LETFs) do not reproduce the corresponding multiple of index returns over extended (quarterly or annual) investment horizons. For instance, in 2008 and early 2009, most LETFs underperformed the corresponding static strategies. In this paper, we study this phenomenon in detail. We give an exact formula linking the return of a leveraged fund with the corresponding multiple of the return of the unleveraged fund and its realized variance. This formula is tested empirically over quarterly horizons for 56 leveraged funds (44 double-leveraged and 12 triple-leveraged) using daily prices since January 2008 or since inception, according to the fund considered. The results indicate excellent agreement between the formula and the empirical data. The study also shows that leveraged funds can be used to replicate the returns of the underlying index, provided we use a dynamic rebalancing strategy. Empirically, we find that rebalancing frequencies required to achieve this goal are moderate-on the order of one week between rebalancings. Nevertheless, this need for dynamic rebalancing leads to the conclusion that LETFs as currently designed may be unsuitable for buy-and-hold investors.",
keywords = "ETFs, Leveraged ETFs, Volatility",
author = "Marco Avellaneda and Stanley Zhang",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1137/090760805",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "586--603",
journal = "SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics",
issn = "1945-497X",
publisher = "Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Path-dependence of leveraged ETF returns

AU - Avellaneda, Marco

AU - Zhang, Stanley

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - It is well known that leveraged exchange-traded funds (LETFs) do not reproduce the corresponding multiple of index returns over extended (quarterly or annual) investment horizons. For instance, in 2008 and early 2009, most LETFs underperformed the corresponding static strategies. In this paper, we study this phenomenon in detail. We give an exact formula linking the return of a leveraged fund with the corresponding multiple of the return of the unleveraged fund and its realized variance. This formula is tested empirically over quarterly horizons for 56 leveraged funds (44 double-leveraged and 12 triple-leveraged) using daily prices since January 2008 or since inception, according to the fund considered. The results indicate excellent agreement between the formula and the empirical data. The study also shows that leveraged funds can be used to replicate the returns of the underlying index, provided we use a dynamic rebalancing strategy. Empirically, we find that rebalancing frequencies required to achieve this goal are moderate-on the order of one week between rebalancings. Nevertheless, this need for dynamic rebalancing leads to the conclusion that LETFs as currently designed may be unsuitable for buy-and-hold investors.

AB - It is well known that leveraged exchange-traded funds (LETFs) do not reproduce the corresponding multiple of index returns over extended (quarterly or annual) investment horizons. For instance, in 2008 and early 2009, most LETFs underperformed the corresponding static strategies. In this paper, we study this phenomenon in detail. We give an exact formula linking the return of a leveraged fund with the corresponding multiple of the return of the unleveraged fund and its realized variance. This formula is tested empirically over quarterly horizons for 56 leveraged funds (44 double-leveraged and 12 triple-leveraged) using daily prices since January 2008 or since inception, according to the fund considered. The results indicate excellent agreement between the formula and the empirical data. The study also shows that leveraged funds can be used to replicate the returns of the underlying index, provided we use a dynamic rebalancing strategy. Empirically, we find that rebalancing frequencies required to achieve this goal are moderate-on the order of one week between rebalancings. Nevertheless, this need for dynamic rebalancing leads to the conclusion that LETFs as currently designed may be unsuitable for buy-and-hold investors.

KW - ETFs

KW - Leveraged ETFs

KW - Volatility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956086054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956086054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1137/090760805

DO - 10.1137/090760805

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 586

EP - 603

JO - SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics

JF - SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics

SN - 1945-497X

IS - 1

ER -