Partnerships to Improve Shared Decision Making for Patients with Hypertension - Health Equity Implications

Aisha T. Langford, Stephen K. Williams, Melanie Applegate, Olugbenga Ogedegbe, Ronald S. Braithwaite

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Shared decision making (SDM) has increasingly become appreciated as a method to enhance patient involvement in health care decisions, patient-provider communication, and patient-centered care. Compared with cancer, the literature on SDM for hypertension is more limited. This is notable because hypertension is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease and both conditions disproportionately affect certain subgroups of patients. However, SDM holds promise for improving health equity by better engaging patients in their health care. For example, many reasonable options exist for treating uncomplicated stage-1 hypertension. These options include medication and/or lifestyle changes such as healthy eating, physical activity, and weight management. Deciding on "the best" plan of action for hypertension management can be challenging because patients have different goals and preferences for treatment. As hypertension management may be considered a preference-sensitive decision, adherence to treatment plans may be greater if those plans are concordant with patient preferences. SDM can be implemented in a broad array of care contexts, from patient-provider dyads to interprofessional collaborations. In this article, we argue that SDM has the potential to advance health equity and improve clinical care. We also propose a process to evaluate whether SDM has occurred and suggest future directions for research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-102
Number of pages6
JournalEthnicity & disease
Volume29
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Hypertension
Delivery of Health Care
Patient Participation
Patient-Centered Care
Patient Preference
Health Equity
Life Style
Patient Care
Cardiovascular Diseases
Communication
Exercise
Weights and Measures
Therapeutics
Research
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Decision Making
  • Health Equity
  • Hypertension
  • Patient Participation
  • Primary Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Partnerships to Improve Shared Decision Making for Patients with Hypertension - Health Equity Implications. / Langford, Aisha T.; Williams, Stephen K.; Applegate, Melanie; Ogedegbe, Olugbenga; Braithwaite, Ronald S.

In: Ethnicity & disease, Vol. 29, 01.01.2019, p. 97-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Langford, Aisha T. ; Williams, Stephen K. ; Applegate, Melanie ; Ogedegbe, Olugbenga ; Braithwaite, Ronald S. / Partnerships to Improve Shared Decision Making for Patients with Hypertension - Health Equity Implications. In: Ethnicity & disease. 2019 ; Vol. 29. pp. 97-102.
@article{f7d41ff0c80249048fc632127b012df1,
title = "Partnerships to Improve Shared Decision Making for Patients with Hypertension - Health Equity Implications",
abstract = "Shared decision making (SDM) has increasingly become appreciated as a method to enhance patient involvement in health care decisions, patient-provider communication, and patient-centered care. Compared with cancer, the literature on SDM for hypertension is more limited. This is notable because hypertension is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease and both conditions disproportionately affect certain subgroups of patients. However, SDM holds promise for improving health equity by better engaging patients in their health care. For example, many reasonable options exist for treating uncomplicated stage-1 hypertension. These options include medication and/or lifestyle changes such as healthy eating, physical activity, and weight management. Deciding on {"}the best{"} plan of action for hypertension management can be challenging because patients have different goals and preferences for treatment. As hypertension management may be considered a preference-sensitive decision, adherence to treatment plans may be greater if those plans are concordant with patient preferences. SDM can be implemented in a broad array of care contexts, from patient-provider dyads to interprofessional collaborations. In this article, we argue that SDM has the potential to advance health equity and improve clinical care. We also propose a process to evaluate whether SDM has occurred and suggest future directions for research.",
keywords = "Decision Making, Health Equity, Hypertension, Patient Participation, Primary Health Care",
author = "Langford, {Aisha T.} and Williams, {Stephen K.} and Melanie Applegate and Olugbenga Ogedegbe and Braithwaite, {Ronald S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.18865/ed.29.S1.97",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "97--102",
journal = "Ethnicity and Disease",
issn = "1049-510X",
publisher = "ISHIB",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Partnerships to Improve Shared Decision Making for Patients with Hypertension - Health Equity Implications

AU - Langford, Aisha T.

AU - Williams, Stephen K.

AU - Applegate, Melanie

AU - Ogedegbe, Olugbenga

AU - Braithwaite, Ronald S.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Shared decision making (SDM) has increasingly become appreciated as a method to enhance patient involvement in health care decisions, patient-provider communication, and patient-centered care. Compared with cancer, the literature on SDM for hypertension is more limited. This is notable because hypertension is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease and both conditions disproportionately affect certain subgroups of patients. However, SDM holds promise for improving health equity by better engaging patients in their health care. For example, many reasonable options exist for treating uncomplicated stage-1 hypertension. These options include medication and/or lifestyle changes such as healthy eating, physical activity, and weight management. Deciding on "the best" plan of action for hypertension management can be challenging because patients have different goals and preferences for treatment. As hypertension management may be considered a preference-sensitive decision, adherence to treatment plans may be greater if those plans are concordant with patient preferences. SDM can be implemented in a broad array of care contexts, from patient-provider dyads to interprofessional collaborations. In this article, we argue that SDM has the potential to advance health equity and improve clinical care. We also propose a process to evaluate whether SDM has occurred and suggest future directions for research.

AB - Shared decision making (SDM) has increasingly become appreciated as a method to enhance patient involvement in health care decisions, patient-provider communication, and patient-centered care. Compared with cancer, the literature on SDM for hypertension is more limited. This is notable because hypertension is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease and both conditions disproportionately affect certain subgroups of patients. However, SDM holds promise for improving health equity by better engaging patients in their health care. For example, many reasonable options exist for treating uncomplicated stage-1 hypertension. These options include medication and/or lifestyle changes such as healthy eating, physical activity, and weight management. Deciding on "the best" plan of action for hypertension management can be challenging because patients have different goals and preferences for treatment. As hypertension management may be considered a preference-sensitive decision, adherence to treatment plans may be greater if those plans are concordant with patient preferences. SDM can be implemented in a broad array of care contexts, from patient-provider dyads to interprofessional collaborations. In this article, we argue that SDM has the potential to advance health equity and improve clinical care. We also propose a process to evaluate whether SDM has occurred and suggest future directions for research.

KW - Decision Making

KW - Health Equity

KW - Hypertension

KW - Patient Participation

KW - Primary Health Care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063712442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063712442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18865/ed.29.S1.97

DO - 10.18865/ed.29.S1.97

M3 - Article

C2 - 30906156

AN - SCOPUS:85063712442

VL - 29

SP - 97

EP - 102

JO - Ethnicity and Disease

JF - Ethnicity and Disease

SN - 1049-510X

ER -