Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion

Delia Baldassarri, Andrew Gelman

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    Public opinion polarization is here conceived as a process of alignment along multiple lines of potential disagreement and measured as growing constraint in individuals' preferences. Using NES data from 1972 to 2004, the authors model trends in issue partisanship - the correlation of issue attitudes with party identification - and issue alignment - the correlation between pairs of issues - and find a substantive increase in issue partisanship, but little evidence of issue alignment. The findings suggest that opinion changes correspond more to a resorting of party labels among voters than to greater constraint on issue attitudes: since parties are more polarized, they are now better at sorting individuals along ideological lines. Levels of constraint vary across population subgroups: strong partisans and wealthier and politically sophisticated voters have grown more coherent in their beliefs. The authors discuss the consequences of partisan realignment and group sorting on the political process and potential deviations from the classic pluralistic account of American politics.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)408-446
    Number of pages39
    JournalAmerican Journal of Sociology
    Volume114
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 2008

    Fingerprint

    polarization
    public opinion
    trend
    politics
    evidence
    Group

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Partisans without constraint : Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. / Baldassarri, Delia; Gelman, Andrew.

    In: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 114, No. 2, 09.2008, p. 408-446.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Baldassarri, Delia ; Gelman, Andrew. / Partisans without constraint : Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. In: American Journal of Sociology. 2008 ; Vol. 114, No. 2. pp. 408-446.
    @article{6127431be5634e1d8d3df5160ee37edd,
    title = "Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion",
    abstract = "Public opinion polarization is here conceived as a process of alignment along multiple lines of potential disagreement and measured as growing constraint in individuals' preferences. Using NES data from 1972 to 2004, the authors model trends in issue partisanship - the correlation of issue attitudes with party identification - and issue alignment - the correlation between pairs of issues - and find a substantive increase in issue partisanship, but little evidence of issue alignment. The findings suggest that opinion changes correspond more to a resorting of party labels among voters than to greater constraint on issue attitudes: since parties are more polarized, they are now better at sorting individuals along ideological lines. Levels of constraint vary across population subgroups: strong partisans and wealthier and politically sophisticated voters have grown more coherent in their beliefs. The authors discuss the consequences of partisan realignment and group sorting on the political process and potential deviations from the classic pluralistic account of American politics.",
    author = "Delia Baldassarri and Andrew Gelman",
    year = "2008",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1086/590649",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "114",
    pages = "408--446",
    journal = "American Journal of Sociology",
    issn = "0002-9602",
    publisher = "University of Chicago",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Partisans without constraint

    T2 - Political polarization and trends in American public opinion

    AU - Baldassarri, Delia

    AU - Gelman, Andrew

    PY - 2008/9

    Y1 - 2008/9

    N2 - Public opinion polarization is here conceived as a process of alignment along multiple lines of potential disagreement and measured as growing constraint in individuals' preferences. Using NES data from 1972 to 2004, the authors model trends in issue partisanship - the correlation of issue attitudes with party identification - and issue alignment - the correlation between pairs of issues - and find a substantive increase in issue partisanship, but little evidence of issue alignment. The findings suggest that opinion changes correspond more to a resorting of party labels among voters than to greater constraint on issue attitudes: since parties are more polarized, they are now better at sorting individuals along ideological lines. Levels of constraint vary across population subgroups: strong partisans and wealthier and politically sophisticated voters have grown more coherent in their beliefs. The authors discuss the consequences of partisan realignment and group sorting on the political process and potential deviations from the classic pluralistic account of American politics.

    AB - Public opinion polarization is here conceived as a process of alignment along multiple lines of potential disagreement and measured as growing constraint in individuals' preferences. Using NES data from 1972 to 2004, the authors model trends in issue partisanship - the correlation of issue attitudes with party identification - and issue alignment - the correlation between pairs of issues - and find a substantive increase in issue partisanship, but little evidence of issue alignment. The findings suggest that opinion changes correspond more to a resorting of party labels among voters than to greater constraint on issue attitudes: since parties are more polarized, they are now better at sorting individuals along ideological lines. Levels of constraint vary across population subgroups: strong partisans and wealthier and politically sophisticated voters have grown more coherent in their beliefs. The authors discuss the consequences of partisan realignment and group sorting on the political process and potential deviations from the classic pluralistic account of American politics.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54349098759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54349098759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1086/590649

    DO - 10.1086/590649

    M3 - Review article

    AN - SCOPUS:54349098759

    VL - 114

    SP - 408

    EP - 446

    JO - American Journal of Sociology

    JF - American Journal of Sociology

    SN - 0002-9602

    IS - 2

    ER -