Part I: A Quantitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers

Emilia H. De Marchis, Danielle Hessler, Caroline Fichtenberg, Nancy Adler, Elena Byhoff, Alicia J. Cohen, Kelly M. Doran, Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba, Eric W. Fleegler, Cara C. Lewis, Stacy Tessler Lindau, Elizabeth L. Tung, Amy G. Huebschmann, Aric A. Prather, Maria Raven, Nicholas Gavin, Susan Jepson, Wendy Johnson, Eduardo Ochoa, Ardis L. OlsonMegan Sandel, Richard S. Sheward, Laura M. Gottlieb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Despite recent growth in healthcare delivery-based social risk screening, little is known about patient perspectives on these activities. This study evaluates patient and caregiver acceptability of social risk screening. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey of 969 adult patients and adult caregivers of pediatric patients recruited from 6 primary care clinics and 4 emergency departments across 9 states. Survey items included the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Accountable Health Communities’ social risk screening tool and questions about appropriateness of screening and comfort with including social risk data in electronic health records. Logistic regressions evaluated covariate associations with acceptability measures. Data collection occurred from July 2018 to February 2019; data analyses were conducted in February‒March 2019. Results: Screening was reported as appropriate by 79% of participants; 65% reported comfort including social risks in electronic health records. In adjusted models, higher perceived screening appropriateness was associated with previous exposure to healthcare-based social risk screening (AOR=1.82, 95% CI=1.16, 2.88), trust in clinicians (AOR=1.55, 95% CI=1.00, 2.40), and recruitment from a primary care setting (AOR=1.70, 95% CI=1.23, 2.38). Lower appropriateness was associated with previous experience of healthcare discrimination (AOR=0.66, 95% CI=0.45, 0.95). Higher comfort with electronic health record documentation was associated with previously receiving assistance with social risks in a healthcare setting (AOR=1.47, 95% CI=1.04, 2.07). Conclusions: A strong majority of adult patients and caregivers of pediatric patients reported that social risk screening was appropriate. Most also felt comfortable including social risk data in electronic health records. Although multiple factors influenced acceptability, the effects were moderate to small. These findings suggest that lack of patient acceptability is unlikely to be a major implementation barrier. Supplement information: This article is part of a supplement entitled Identifying and Intervening on Social Needs in Clinical Settings: Evidence and Evidence Gaps, which is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Kaiser Permanente, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S25-S37
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume57
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Electronic Health Records
Delivery of Health Care
Primary Health Care
United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Pediatrics
United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
Medicaid
Medicare
Documentation
Hospital Emergency Service
Cross-Sectional Studies
Logistic Models
Health
Growth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

De Marchis, E. H., Hessler, D., Fichtenberg, C., Adler, N., Byhoff, E., Cohen, A. J., ... Gottlieb, L. M. (2019). Part I: A Quantitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57(6), S25-S37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.010

Part I : A Quantitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers. / De Marchis, Emilia H.; Hessler, Danielle; Fichtenberg, Caroline; Adler, Nancy; Byhoff, Elena; Cohen, Alicia J.; Doran, Kelly M.; Ettinger de Cuba, Stephanie; Fleegler, Eric W.; Lewis, Cara C.; Lindau, Stacy Tessler; Tung, Elizabeth L.; Huebschmann, Amy G.; Prather, Aric A.; Raven, Maria; Gavin, Nicholas; Jepson, Susan; Johnson, Wendy; Ochoa, Eduardo; Olson, Ardis L.; Sandel, Megan; Sheward, Richard S.; Gottlieb, Laura M.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 57, No. 6, 12.2019, p. S25-S37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

De Marchis, EH, Hessler, D, Fichtenberg, C, Adler, N, Byhoff, E, Cohen, AJ, Doran, KM, Ettinger de Cuba, S, Fleegler, EW, Lewis, CC, Lindau, ST, Tung, EL, Huebschmann, AG, Prather, AA, Raven, M, Gavin, N, Jepson, S, Johnson, W, Ochoa, E, Olson, AL, Sandel, M, Sheward, RS & Gottlieb, LM 2019, 'Part I: A Quantitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers', American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. S25-S37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.010
De Marchis, Emilia H. ; Hessler, Danielle ; Fichtenberg, Caroline ; Adler, Nancy ; Byhoff, Elena ; Cohen, Alicia J. ; Doran, Kelly M. ; Ettinger de Cuba, Stephanie ; Fleegler, Eric W. ; Lewis, Cara C. ; Lindau, Stacy Tessler ; Tung, Elizabeth L. ; Huebschmann, Amy G. ; Prather, Aric A. ; Raven, Maria ; Gavin, Nicholas ; Jepson, Susan ; Johnson, Wendy ; Ochoa, Eduardo ; Olson, Ardis L. ; Sandel, Megan ; Sheward, Richard S. ; Gottlieb, Laura M. / Part I : A Quantitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 57, No. 6. pp. S25-S37.
@article{d54e9b5dc73f49b8b7a35a68a9a5be9d,
title = "Part I: A Quantitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers",
abstract = "Introduction: Despite recent growth in healthcare delivery-based social risk screening, little is known about patient perspectives on these activities. This study evaluates patient and caregiver acceptability of social risk screening. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey of 969 adult patients and adult caregivers of pediatric patients recruited from 6 primary care clinics and 4 emergency departments across 9 states. Survey items included the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Accountable Health Communities’ social risk screening tool and questions about appropriateness of screening and comfort with including social risk data in electronic health records. Logistic regressions evaluated covariate associations with acceptability measures. Data collection occurred from July 2018 to February 2019; data analyses were conducted in February‒March 2019. Results: Screening was reported as appropriate by 79{\%} of participants; 65{\%} reported comfort including social risks in electronic health records. In adjusted models, higher perceived screening appropriateness was associated with previous exposure to healthcare-based social risk screening (AOR=1.82, 95{\%} CI=1.16, 2.88), trust in clinicians (AOR=1.55, 95{\%} CI=1.00, 2.40), and recruitment from a primary care setting (AOR=1.70, 95{\%} CI=1.23, 2.38). Lower appropriateness was associated with previous experience of healthcare discrimination (AOR=0.66, 95{\%} CI=0.45, 0.95). Higher comfort with electronic health record documentation was associated with previously receiving assistance with social risks in a healthcare setting (AOR=1.47, 95{\%} CI=1.04, 2.07). Conclusions: A strong majority of adult patients and caregivers of pediatric patients reported that social risk screening was appropriate. Most also felt comfortable including social risk data in electronic health records. Although multiple factors influenced acceptability, the effects were moderate to small. These findings suggest that lack of patient acceptability is unlikely to be a major implementation barrier. Supplement information: This article is part of a supplement entitled Identifying and Intervening on Social Needs in Clinical Settings: Evidence and Evidence Gaps, which is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Kaiser Permanente, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.",
author = "{De Marchis}, {Emilia H.} and Danielle Hessler and Caroline Fichtenberg and Nancy Adler and Elena Byhoff and Cohen, {Alicia J.} and Doran, {Kelly M.} and {Ettinger de Cuba}, Stephanie and Fleegler, {Eric W.} and Lewis, {Cara C.} and Lindau, {Stacy Tessler} and Tung, {Elizabeth L.} and Huebschmann, {Amy G.} and Prather, {Aric A.} and Maria Raven and Nicholas Gavin and Susan Jepson and Wendy Johnson and Eduardo Ochoa and Olson, {Ardis L.} and Megan Sandel and Sheward, {Richard S.} and Gottlieb, {Laura M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "S25--S37",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Part I

T2 - A Quantitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers

AU - De Marchis, Emilia H.

AU - Hessler, Danielle

AU - Fichtenberg, Caroline

AU - Adler, Nancy

AU - Byhoff, Elena

AU - Cohen, Alicia J.

AU - Doran, Kelly M.

AU - Ettinger de Cuba, Stephanie

AU - Fleegler, Eric W.

AU - Lewis, Cara C.

AU - Lindau, Stacy Tessler

AU - Tung, Elizabeth L.

AU - Huebschmann, Amy G.

AU - Prather, Aric A.

AU - Raven, Maria

AU - Gavin, Nicholas

AU - Jepson, Susan

AU - Johnson, Wendy

AU - Ochoa, Eduardo

AU - Olson, Ardis L.

AU - Sandel, Megan

AU - Sheward, Richard S.

AU - Gottlieb, Laura M.

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - Introduction: Despite recent growth in healthcare delivery-based social risk screening, little is known about patient perspectives on these activities. This study evaluates patient and caregiver acceptability of social risk screening. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey of 969 adult patients and adult caregivers of pediatric patients recruited from 6 primary care clinics and 4 emergency departments across 9 states. Survey items included the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Accountable Health Communities’ social risk screening tool and questions about appropriateness of screening and comfort with including social risk data in electronic health records. Logistic regressions evaluated covariate associations with acceptability measures. Data collection occurred from July 2018 to February 2019; data analyses were conducted in February‒March 2019. Results: Screening was reported as appropriate by 79% of participants; 65% reported comfort including social risks in electronic health records. In adjusted models, higher perceived screening appropriateness was associated with previous exposure to healthcare-based social risk screening (AOR=1.82, 95% CI=1.16, 2.88), trust in clinicians (AOR=1.55, 95% CI=1.00, 2.40), and recruitment from a primary care setting (AOR=1.70, 95% CI=1.23, 2.38). Lower appropriateness was associated with previous experience of healthcare discrimination (AOR=0.66, 95% CI=0.45, 0.95). Higher comfort with electronic health record documentation was associated with previously receiving assistance with social risks in a healthcare setting (AOR=1.47, 95% CI=1.04, 2.07). Conclusions: A strong majority of adult patients and caregivers of pediatric patients reported that social risk screening was appropriate. Most also felt comfortable including social risk data in electronic health records. Although multiple factors influenced acceptability, the effects were moderate to small. These findings suggest that lack of patient acceptability is unlikely to be a major implementation barrier. Supplement information: This article is part of a supplement entitled Identifying and Intervening on Social Needs in Clinical Settings: Evidence and Evidence Gaps, which is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Kaiser Permanente, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

AB - Introduction: Despite recent growth in healthcare delivery-based social risk screening, little is known about patient perspectives on these activities. This study evaluates patient and caregiver acceptability of social risk screening. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey of 969 adult patients and adult caregivers of pediatric patients recruited from 6 primary care clinics and 4 emergency departments across 9 states. Survey items included the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Accountable Health Communities’ social risk screening tool and questions about appropriateness of screening and comfort with including social risk data in electronic health records. Logistic regressions evaluated covariate associations with acceptability measures. Data collection occurred from July 2018 to February 2019; data analyses were conducted in February‒March 2019. Results: Screening was reported as appropriate by 79% of participants; 65% reported comfort including social risks in electronic health records. In adjusted models, higher perceived screening appropriateness was associated with previous exposure to healthcare-based social risk screening (AOR=1.82, 95% CI=1.16, 2.88), trust in clinicians (AOR=1.55, 95% CI=1.00, 2.40), and recruitment from a primary care setting (AOR=1.70, 95% CI=1.23, 2.38). Lower appropriateness was associated with previous experience of healthcare discrimination (AOR=0.66, 95% CI=0.45, 0.95). Higher comfort with electronic health record documentation was associated with previously receiving assistance with social risks in a healthcare setting (AOR=1.47, 95% CI=1.04, 2.07). Conclusions: A strong majority of adult patients and caregivers of pediatric patients reported that social risk screening was appropriate. Most also felt comfortable including social risk data in electronic health records. Although multiple factors influenced acceptability, the effects were moderate to small. These findings suggest that lack of patient acceptability is unlikely to be a major implementation barrier. Supplement information: This article is part of a supplement entitled Identifying and Intervening on Social Needs in Clinical Settings: Evidence and Evidence Gaps, which is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Kaiser Permanente, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075019167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075019167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.010

DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 31753277

AN - SCOPUS:85075019167

VL - 57

SP - S25-S37

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 6

ER -