Paradox and collaboration in network management

Sonia M. Ospina, Angel Saz-Carranza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Qualitative evidence from action networks is used to answer the research question, How do leaders of successful networks manage collaboration challenges to make things happen? This study of two urban immigration coalitions in the United States found that their leaders developed practices as a response to two paradoxical requirements of network collaboration: Managing unity and diversity when doing inward work and confrontation and dialogue when doing outward work. By illuminating how leaders responded to these complex demands inherent in action networks, the authors open up the black box of managing whole networks of organizations and underscore the role of leadership in interorganizational collaboration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)404-440
Number of pages37
JournalAdministration and Society
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

management
leader
coalition
immigration
dialogue
Network management
Paradox
leadership
Collaboration networks
evidence
Immigration
Black box
Inter-organizational collaboration

Keywords

  • Collaboration
  • Networks
  • Paradox
  • Qualitative research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

Paradox and collaboration in network management. / Ospina, Sonia M.; Saz-Carranza, Angel.

In: Administration and Society, Vol. 42, No. 4, 07.2010, p. 404-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ospina, Sonia M. ; Saz-Carranza, Angel. / Paradox and collaboration in network management. In: Administration and Society. 2010 ; Vol. 42, No. 4. pp. 404-440.
@article{a201fb12332349258cade14d045367a4,
title = "Paradox and collaboration in network management",
abstract = "Qualitative evidence from action networks is used to answer the research question, How do leaders of successful networks manage collaboration challenges to make things happen? This study of two urban immigration coalitions in the United States found that their leaders developed practices as a response to two paradoxical requirements of network collaboration: Managing unity and diversity when doing inward work and confrontation and dialogue when doing outward work. By illuminating how leaders responded to these complex demands inherent in action networks, the authors open up the black box of managing whole networks of organizations and underscore the role of leadership in interorganizational collaboration.",
keywords = "Collaboration, Networks, Paradox, Qualitative research",
author = "Ospina, {Sonia M.} and Angel Saz-Carranza",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1177/0095399710362723",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "404--440",
journal = "Administration and Society",
issn = "0095-3997",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paradox and collaboration in network management

AU - Ospina, Sonia M.

AU - Saz-Carranza, Angel

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - Qualitative evidence from action networks is used to answer the research question, How do leaders of successful networks manage collaboration challenges to make things happen? This study of two urban immigration coalitions in the United States found that their leaders developed practices as a response to two paradoxical requirements of network collaboration: Managing unity and diversity when doing inward work and confrontation and dialogue when doing outward work. By illuminating how leaders responded to these complex demands inherent in action networks, the authors open up the black box of managing whole networks of organizations and underscore the role of leadership in interorganizational collaboration.

AB - Qualitative evidence from action networks is used to answer the research question, How do leaders of successful networks manage collaboration challenges to make things happen? This study of two urban immigration coalitions in the United States found that their leaders developed practices as a response to two paradoxical requirements of network collaboration: Managing unity and diversity when doing inward work and confrontation and dialogue when doing outward work. By illuminating how leaders responded to these complex demands inherent in action networks, the authors open up the black box of managing whole networks of organizations and underscore the role of leadership in interorganizational collaboration.

KW - Collaboration

KW - Networks

KW - Paradox

KW - Qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954820456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954820456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0095399710362723

DO - 10.1177/0095399710362723

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 404

EP - 440

JO - Administration and Society

JF - Administration and Society

SN - 0095-3997

IS - 4

ER -