Paradigm shifts and site-based management in the United States toward a paradigm of social empowerment

Gary Anderson, Alexandra Dixon

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The current popularity of participatory, site-based management seems to be driven by its close association in the minds of many with democracy, empowerment and decentralized, local decision-making. Ironically, less than a decade ago the effective schools literature was touting school principals as the heroes of school reform. Effective schools had principals that were strong leaders who were responsible for everything from an orderly school climate to a school’s high achievement scores. Principals who achieved positive change in their school, we were told, were those who were able effectively to promoteeven through supportive coercion if necessary-innovation and change (Huberman and Miles, 1984). Now the image of the strong leader who makes the difference between an effective or ineffective school has given way to the facilitator who empowers by sharing decision-making power with a variety of stakeholders, or, in its strongest manifestation, the notion of schools without principals at all. This apparently dramatic shift in management theory exists in the context of an equally dramatic saga of school reform in the US.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationA Socially Critical View of the Self-Managing School
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages43-54
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9781135721169
ISBN (Print)9780750702126
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

empowerment
paradigm
principal
school reform
management
school
leader
decision making
school climate
popularity
stakeholder
democracy
innovation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Anderson, G., & Dixon, A. (2005). Paradigm shifts and site-based management in the United States toward a paradigm of social empowerment. In A Socially Critical View of the Self-Managing School (pp. 43-54). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203973882

Paradigm shifts and site-based management in the United States toward a paradigm of social empowerment. / Anderson, Gary; Dixon, Alexandra.

A Socially Critical View of the Self-Managing School. Taylor and Francis, 2005. p. 43-54.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Anderson, G & Dixon, A 2005, Paradigm shifts and site-based management in the United States toward a paradigm of social empowerment. in A Socially Critical View of the Self-Managing School. Taylor and Francis, pp. 43-54. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203973882
Anderson G, Dixon A. Paradigm shifts and site-based management in the United States toward a paradigm of social empowerment. In A Socially Critical View of the Self-Managing School. Taylor and Francis. 2005. p. 43-54 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203973882
Anderson, Gary ; Dixon, Alexandra. / Paradigm shifts and site-based management in the United States toward a paradigm of social empowerment. A Socially Critical View of the Self-Managing School. Taylor and Francis, 2005. pp. 43-54
@inbook{9e991fd84d9445029575e2647f9e8906,
title = "Paradigm shifts and site-based management in the United States toward a paradigm of social empowerment",
abstract = "The current popularity of participatory, site-based management seems to be driven by its close association in the minds of many with democracy, empowerment and decentralized, local decision-making. Ironically, less than a decade ago the effective schools literature was touting school principals as the heroes of school reform. Effective schools had principals that were strong leaders who were responsible for everything from an orderly school climate to a school’s high achievement scores. Principals who achieved positive change in their school, we were told, were those who were able effectively to promoteeven through supportive coercion if necessary-innovation and change (Huberman and Miles, 1984). Now the image of the strong leader who makes the difference between an effective or ineffective school has given way to the facilitator who empowers by sharing decision-making power with a variety of stakeholders, or, in its strongest manifestation, the notion of schools without principals at all. This apparently dramatic shift in management theory exists in the context of an equally dramatic saga of school reform in the US.",
author = "Gary Anderson and Alexandra Dixon",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9780203973882",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780750702126",
pages = "43--54",
booktitle = "A Socially Critical View of the Self-Managing School",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Paradigm shifts and site-based management in the United States toward a paradigm of social empowerment

AU - Anderson, Gary

AU - Dixon, Alexandra

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - The current popularity of participatory, site-based management seems to be driven by its close association in the minds of many with democracy, empowerment and decentralized, local decision-making. Ironically, less than a decade ago the effective schools literature was touting school principals as the heroes of school reform. Effective schools had principals that were strong leaders who were responsible for everything from an orderly school climate to a school’s high achievement scores. Principals who achieved positive change in their school, we were told, were those who were able effectively to promoteeven through supportive coercion if necessary-innovation and change (Huberman and Miles, 1984). Now the image of the strong leader who makes the difference between an effective or ineffective school has given way to the facilitator who empowers by sharing decision-making power with a variety of stakeholders, or, in its strongest manifestation, the notion of schools without principals at all. This apparently dramatic shift in management theory exists in the context of an equally dramatic saga of school reform in the US.

AB - The current popularity of participatory, site-based management seems to be driven by its close association in the minds of many with democracy, empowerment and decentralized, local decision-making. Ironically, less than a decade ago the effective schools literature was touting school principals as the heroes of school reform. Effective schools had principals that were strong leaders who were responsible for everything from an orderly school climate to a school’s high achievement scores. Principals who achieved positive change in their school, we were told, were those who were able effectively to promoteeven through supportive coercion if necessary-innovation and change (Huberman and Miles, 1984). Now the image of the strong leader who makes the difference between an effective or ineffective school has given way to the facilitator who empowers by sharing decision-making power with a variety of stakeholders, or, in its strongest manifestation, the notion of schools without principals at all. This apparently dramatic shift in management theory exists in the context of an equally dramatic saga of school reform in the US.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050775504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050775504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9780203973882

DO - 10.4324/9780203973882

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780750702126

SP - 43

EP - 54

BT - A Socially Critical View of the Self-Managing School

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -