Panel Management to Improve Smoking and Hypertension Outcomes by VA Primary Care Teams: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

Mark D. Schwartz, Ashley Jensen, Binhuan Wang, Katelyn Bennett, Anne Dembitzer, Shiela Strauss, Antoinette Schoenthaler, Colleen Gillespie, Scott Sherman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Panel Management can expand prevention and chronic illness management beyond the office visit, but there is limited evidence for its effectiveness or guidance on how best to incorporate it into practice. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to test the effectiveness of incorporating panel management into clinical practice by incorporating Panel Management Assistants (PMAs) into primary care teams with and without panel management education. DESIGN: We conducted an 8-month cluster-randomized controlled trial of panel management for improving hypertension and smoking cessation outcomes among veterans. PATRICIPANTS: Twenty primary care teams from the Veterans Affairs New York Harbor were randomized to control, panel management support, or panel management support plus education groups. Teams included 69 clinical staff serving 8,153 hypertensive and/or smoking veterans. INTERVENTIONS: Teams assigned to the intervention groups worked with non-clinical Panel Management Assistants (PMAs) who monitored care gaps and conducted proactive patient outreach, including referrals, mail reminders and motivational interviewing by telephone. MAIN MEASURES: Measurements included mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, proportion of patients with controlled blood pressure, self-reported quit attempts, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) prescriptions, and referrals to disease management services. KEY RESULTS: Change in mean blood pressure, blood pressure control, and smoking quit rates were similar across study groups. Patients on intervention teams were more likely to receive NRT (OR = 1.4; 95 % CI 1.2–1.6) and enroll in the disease management services MOVE! (OR = 1.2; 95 % CI 1.1–1.6) and Telehealth (OR = 1.7, 95 % CI 1.4–2.1) than patients on control teams. CONCLUSIONS: Panel Management support for primary care teams improved process, but not outcome variables among veterans with hypertension and smoking. Incorporating PMAs into teams was feasible and highly valued by the clinical staff, but clinical impact may require a longer intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)916-923
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume30
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 10 2015

Fingerprint

Veterans
Primary Health Care
Randomized Controlled Trials
Smoking
Blood Pressure
Hypertension
Disease Management
Nicotine
Referral and Consultation
Motivational Interviewing
Education
Office Visits
Telemedicine
Postal Service
Smoking Cessation
Telephone
Prescriptions
Chronic Disease
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • hypertension
  • panel management
  • PCMH
  • smoking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Panel Management to Improve Smoking and Hypertension Outcomes by VA Primary Care Teams : A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. / Schwartz, Mark D.; Jensen, Ashley; Wang, Binhuan; Bennett, Katelyn; Dembitzer, Anne; Strauss, Shiela; Schoenthaler, Antoinette; Gillespie, Colleen; Sherman, Scott.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 7, 10.02.2015, p. 916-923.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schwartz, Mark D. ; Jensen, Ashley ; Wang, Binhuan ; Bennett, Katelyn ; Dembitzer, Anne ; Strauss, Shiela ; Schoenthaler, Antoinette ; Gillespie, Colleen ; Sherman, Scott. / Panel Management to Improve Smoking and Hypertension Outcomes by VA Primary Care Teams : A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 7. pp. 916-923.
@article{7ccb1706bee34d918ccc8ddf1973ff4a,
title = "Panel Management to Improve Smoking and Hypertension Outcomes by VA Primary Care Teams: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Panel Management can expand prevention and chronic illness management beyond the office visit, but there is limited evidence for its effectiveness or guidance on how best to incorporate it into practice. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to test the effectiveness of incorporating panel management into clinical practice by incorporating Panel Management Assistants (PMAs) into primary care teams with and without panel management education. DESIGN: We conducted an 8-month cluster-randomized controlled trial of panel management for improving hypertension and smoking cessation outcomes among veterans. PATRICIPANTS: Twenty primary care teams from the Veterans Affairs New York Harbor were randomized to control, panel management support, or panel management support plus education groups. Teams included 69 clinical staff serving 8,153 hypertensive and/or smoking veterans. INTERVENTIONS: Teams assigned to the intervention groups worked with non-clinical Panel Management Assistants (PMAs) who monitored care gaps and conducted proactive patient outreach, including referrals, mail reminders and motivational interviewing by telephone. MAIN MEASURES: Measurements included mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, proportion of patients with controlled blood pressure, self-reported quit attempts, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) prescriptions, and referrals to disease management services. KEY RESULTS: Change in mean blood pressure, blood pressure control, and smoking quit rates were similar across study groups. Patients on intervention teams were more likely to receive NRT (OR = 1.4; 95 {\%} CI 1.2–1.6) and enroll in the disease management services MOVE! (OR = 1.2; 95 {\%} CI 1.1–1.6) and Telehealth (OR = 1.7, 95 {\%} CI 1.4–2.1) than patients on control teams. CONCLUSIONS: Panel Management support for primary care teams improved process, but not outcome variables among veterans with hypertension and smoking. Incorporating PMAs into teams was feasible and highly valued by the clinical staff, but clinical impact may require a longer intervention.",
keywords = "hypertension, panel management, PCMH, smoking",
author = "Schwartz, {Mark D.} and Ashley Jensen and Binhuan Wang and Katelyn Bennett and Anne Dembitzer and Shiela Strauss and Antoinette Schoenthaler and Colleen Gillespie and Scott Sherman",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-015-3204-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "916--923",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Panel Management to Improve Smoking and Hypertension Outcomes by VA Primary Care Teams

T2 - A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

AU - Schwartz, Mark D.

AU - Jensen, Ashley

AU - Wang, Binhuan

AU - Bennett, Katelyn

AU - Dembitzer, Anne

AU - Strauss, Shiela

AU - Schoenthaler, Antoinette

AU - Gillespie, Colleen

AU - Sherman, Scott

PY - 2015/2/10

Y1 - 2015/2/10

N2 - BACKGROUND: Panel Management can expand prevention and chronic illness management beyond the office visit, but there is limited evidence for its effectiveness or guidance on how best to incorporate it into practice. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to test the effectiveness of incorporating panel management into clinical practice by incorporating Panel Management Assistants (PMAs) into primary care teams with and without panel management education. DESIGN: We conducted an 8-month cluster-randomized controlled trial of panel management for improving hypertension and smoking cessation outcomes among veterans. PATRICIPANTS: Twenty primary care teams from the Veterans Affairs New York Harbor were randomized to control, panel management support, or panel management support plus education groups. Teams included 69 clinical staff serving 8,153 hypertensive and/or smoking veterans. INTERVENTIONS: Teams assigned to the intervention groups worked with non-clinical Panel Management Assistants (PMAs) who monitored care gaps and conducted proactive patient outreach, including referrals, mail reminders and motivational interviewing by telephone. MAIN MEASURES: Measurements included mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, proportion of patients with controlled blood pressure, self-reported quit attempts, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) prescriptions, and referrals to disease management services. KEY RESULTS: Change in mean blood pressure, blood pressure control, and smoking quit rates were similar across study groups. Patients on intervention teams were more likely to receive NRT (OR = 1.4; 95 % CI 1.2–1.6) and enroll in the disease management services MOVE! (OR = 1.2; 95 % CI 1.1–1.6) and Telehealth (OR = 1.7, 95 % CI 1.4–2.1) than patients on control teams. CONCLUSIONS: Panel Management support for primary care teams improved process, but not outcome variables among veterans with hypertension and smoking. Incorporating PMAs into teams was feasible and highly valued by the clinical staff, but clinical impact may require a longer intervention.

AB - BACKGROUND: Panel Management can expand prevention and chronic illness management beyond the office visit, but there is limited evidence for its effectiveness or guidance on how best to incorporate it into practice. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to test the effectiveness of incorporating panel management into clinical practice by incorporating Panel Management Assistants (PMAs) into primary care teams with and without panel management education. DESIGN: We conducted an 8-month cluster-randomized controlled trial of panel management for improving hypertension and smoking cessation outcomes among veterans. PATRICIPANTS: Twenty primary care teams from the Veterans Affairs New York Harbor were randomized to control, panel management support, or panel management support plus education groups. Teams included 69 clinical staff serving 8,153 hypertensive and/or smoking veterans. INTERVENTIONS: Teams assigned to the intervention groups worked with non-clinical Panel Management Assistants (PMAs) who monitored care gaps and conducted proactive patient outreach, including referrals, mail reminders and motivational interviewing by telephone. MAIN MEASURES: Measurements included mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, proportion of patients with controlled blood pressure, self-reported quit attempts, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) prescriptions, and referrals to disease management services. KEY RESULTS: Change in mean blood pressure, blood pressure control, and smoking quit rates were similar across study groups. Patients on intervention teams were more likely to receive NRT (OR = 1.4; 95 % CI 1.2–1.6) and enroll in the disease management services MOVE! (OR = 1.2; 95 % CI 1.1–1.6) and Telehealth (OR = 1.7, 95 % CI 1.4–2.1) than patients on control teams. CONCLUSIONS: Panel Management support for primary care teams improved process, but not outcome variables among veterans with hypertension and smoking. Incorporating PMAs into teams was feasible and highly valued by the clinical staff, but clinical impact may require a longer intervention.

KW - hypertension

KW - panel management

KW - PCMH

KW - smoking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931559868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931559868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-015-3204-y

DO - 10.1007/s11606-015-3204-y

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 916

EP - 923

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 7

ER -