Panel: A debate on data and algorithmic ethics

Julia Stoyanovich, Bill Howe, H. V. Jagadish, Gerome Miklau

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

    Abstract

    Recently, there has begun a movement towards Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT) in algorithmic decision making, and in data science more broadly. The database community has not been significantly involved in this movement, despite “owning“ the models, languages, and systems that produce the (potentially biased) input to the machine learning applications. What role should the database community play in this movement? Do the objectives of fairness, accountability and transparency give rise to core data management issues that can drive new research questions and new systems, or are these “soft topics“ that are best left to be managed with policy? Will emphasis on these topics dilute our core competency in techniques and technologies for data, or can it reinforce our central role in technology stacks ranging from startups to the enterprise, and from local non-profits to the federal government? The goal of this panel is to debate these questions, and to whet the appetite of the data management community for research in this important emerging area.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)2165-2167
    Number of pages3
    JournalProceedings of the VLDB Endowment
    Volume11
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
    Event44th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB 2018 - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Duration: Aug 27 2017Aug 31 2017

    Fingerprint

    Transparency
    Information management
    Learning systems
    Decision making
    Industry

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Computer Science (miscellaneous)
    • Computer Science(all)

    Cite this

    Stoyanovich, J., Howe, B., Jagadish, H. V., & Miklau, G. (2017). Panel: A debate on data and algorithmic ethics. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 11(12), 2165-2167. https://doi.org/10.14778/3229863.3240494

    Panel : A debate on data and algorithmic ethics. / Stoyanovich, Julia; Howe, Bill; Jagadish, H. V.; Miklau, Gerome.

    In: Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, Vol. 11, No. 12, 01.01.2017, p. 2165-2167.

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

    Stoyanovich, J, Howe, B, Jagadish, HV & Miklau, G 2017, 'Panel: A debate on data and algorithmic ethics', Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 2165-2167. https://doi.org/10.14778/3229863.3240494
    Stoyanovich, Julia ; Howe, Bill ; Jagadish, H. V. ; Miklau, Gerome. / Panel : A debate on data and algorithmic ethics. In: Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment. 2017 ; Vol. 11, No. 12. pp. 2165-2167.
    @article{0c5cc9ae658341efa4012c49f2f7edf1,
    title = "Panel: A debate on data and algorithmic ethics",
    abstract = "Recently, there has begun a movement towards Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT) in algorithmic decision making, and in data science more broadly. The database community has not been significantly involved in this movement, despite “owning“ the models, languages, and systems that produce the (potentially biased) input to the machine learning applications. What role should the database community play in this movement? Do the objectives of fairness, accountability and transparency give rise to core data management issues that can drive new research questions and new systems, or are these “soft topics“ that are best left to be managed with policy? Will emphasis on these topics dilute our core competency in techniques and technologies for data, or can it reinforce our central role in technology stacks ranging from startups to the enterprise, and from local non-profits to the federal government? The goal of this panel is to debate these questions, and to whet the appetite of the data management community for research in this important emerging area.",
    author = "Julia Stoyanovich and Bill Howe and Jagadish, {H. V.} and Gerome Miklau",
    year = "2017",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.14778/3229863.3240494",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "11",
    pages = "2165--2167",
    journal = "Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment",
    issn = "2150-8097",
    publisher = "Very Large Data Base Endowment Inc.",
    number = "12",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Panel

    T2 - A debate on data and algorithmic ethics

    AU - Stoyanovich, Julia

    AU - Howe, Bill

    AU - Jagadish, H. V.

    AU - Miklau, Gerome

    PY - 2017/1/1

    Y1 - 2017/1/1

    N2 - Recently, there has begun a movement towards Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT) in algorithmic decision making, and in data science more broadly. The database community has not been significantly involved in this movement, despite “owning“ the models, languages, and systems that produce the (potentially biased) input to the machine learning applications. What role should the database community play in this movement? Do the objectives of fairness, accountability and transparency give rise to core data management issues that can drive new research questions and new systems, or are these “soft topics“ that are best left to be managed with policy? Will emphasis on these topics dilute our core competency in techniques and technologies for data, or can it reinforce our central role in technology stacks ranging from startups to the enterprise, and from local non-profits to the federal government? The goal of this panel is to debate these questions, and to whet the appetite of the data management community for research in this important emerging area.

    AB - Recently, there has begun a movement towards Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT) in algorithmic decision making, and in data science more broadly. The database community has not been significantly involved in this movement, despite “owning“ the models, languages, and systems that produce the (potentially biased) input to the machine learning applications. What role should the database community play in this movement? Do the objectives of fairness, accountability and transparency give rise to core data management issues that can drive new research questions and new systems, or are these “soft topics“ that are best left to be managed with policy? Will emphasis on these topics dilute our core competency in techniques and technologies for data, or can it reinforce our central role in technology stacks ranging from startups to the enterprise, and from local non-profits to the federal government? The goal of this panel is to debate these questions, and to whet the appetite of the data management community for research in this important emerging area.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058884554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058884554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.14778/3229863.3240494

    DO - 10.14778/3229863.3240494

    M3 - Conference article

    AN - SCOPUS:85058884554

    VL - 11

    SP - 2165

    EP - 2167

    JO - Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

    JF - Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

    SN - 2150-8097

    IS - 12

    ER -