Outstanding questions in first amendment law related to food labeling disclosure requirements for health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The federal and state governments are increasingly focusing on food labeling as a method to support good health. Many such laws are opposed by the food industry and may be challenged in court, raising the question of what is legally feasible. This article analyzes outstanding questions in First Amendment law related to commercial disclosure requirements and conducts legal analysis and policy evaluation for three current policies. These include the Food and Drug Administration's draft regulation requiring an added sugar disclosure on the Nutrition Facts panel, California's proposed sugar-sweetened beverage safety warning label bill, and Vermont's law requiring labels of genetically engineered food to disclose this information. I recommend several methods for policy makers to enact food labeling laws within First Amendment parameters, including imposing factual commercial disclosure requirements, disclosing the government entity issuing a warning, collecting evidence, and identifying legitimate governmental interests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1986-1992
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume34
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Food Labeling
Disclosure
Health
Food Legislation
State Government
Federal Government
Policy Making
Food Industry
Beverages
United States Food and Drug Administration
Administrative Personnel
Safety
Food

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Outstanding questions in first amendment law related to food labeling disclosure requirements for health. / Pomeranz, Jennifer L.

In: Health Affairs, Vol. 34, No. 11, 2015, p. 1986-1992.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c5a52d567b8d4f488fd96364305a11cb,
title = "Outstanding questions in first amendment law related to food labeling disclosure requirements for health",
abstract = "The federal and state governments are increasingly focusing on food labeling as a method to support good health. Many such laws are opposed by the food industry and may be challenged in court, raising the question of what is legally feasible. This article analyzes outstanding questions in First Amendment law related to commercial disclosure requirements and conducts legal analysis and policy evaluation for three current policies. These include the Food and Drug Administration's draft regulation requiring an added sugar disclosure on the Nutrition Facts panel, California's proposed sugar-sweetened beverage safety warning label bill, and Vermont's law requiring labels of genetically engineered food to disclose this information. I recommend several methods for policy makers to enact food labeling laws within First Amendment parameters, including imposing factual commercial disclosure requirements, disclosing the government entity issuing a warning, collecting evidence, and identifying legitimate governmental interests.",
author = "Pomeranz, {Jennifer L.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0616",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "1986--1992",
journal = "Health Affairs",
issn = "0278-2715",
publisher = "Project Hope",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outstanding questions in first amendment law related to food labeling disclosure requirements for health

AU - Pomeranz, Jennifer L.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The federal and state governments are increasingly focusing on food labeling as a method to support good health. Many such laws are opposed by the food industry and may be challenged in court, raising the question of what is legally feasible. This article analyzes outstanding questions in First Amendment law related to commercial disclosure requirements and conducts legal analysis and policy evaluation for three current policies. These include the Food and Drug Administration's draft regulation requiring an added sugar disclosure on the Nutrition Facts panel, California's proposed sugar-sweetened beverage safety warning label bill, and Vermont's law requiring labels of genetically engineered food to disclose this information. I recommend several methods for policy makers to enact food labeling laws within First Amendment parameters, including imposing factual commercial disclosure requirements, disclosing the government entity issuing a warning, collecting evidence, and identifying legitimate governmental interests.

AB - The federal and state governments are increasingly focusing on food labeling as a method to support good health. Many such laws are opposed by the food industry and may be challenged in court, raising the question of what is legally feasible. This article analyzes outstanding questions in First Amendment law related to commercial disclosure requirements and conducts legal analysis and policy evaluation for three current policies. These include the Food and Drug Administration's draft regulation requiring an added sugar disclosure on the Nutrition Facts panel, California's proposed sugar-sweetened beverage safety warning label bill, and Vermont's law requiring labels of genetically engineered food to disclose this information. I recommend several methods for policy makers to enact food labeling laws within First Amendment parameters, including imposing factual commercial disclosure requirements, disclosing the government entity issuing a warning, collecting evidence, and identifying legitimate governmental interests.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949213269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949213269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0616

DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0616

M3 - Article

C2 - 26526259

AN - SCOPUS:84949213269

VL - 34

SP - 1986

EP - 1992

JO - Health Affairs

JF - Health Affairs

SN - 0278-2715

IS - 11

ER -