Outline of a sociology of decisionism

Gabriel Abend

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    I propose an agenda for empirical research on decision, choice, decision-makers, and decision-making qua social facts. Given society S, group G, or field F, I make a twofold sociological proposal. First, empirically investigate the conditions under which something—call it X—is taken to be a decision or choice, or the outcome of a decision-making process. What must X be like? What doesn't count (besides, presumably, myotatic reflexes and blushing)? Whom or what must X be done by? What can't be a decision-maker (besides, presumably, rocks and apples)? Second, empirically investigate how decision/choice concepts are used in everyday life, politics, business, education, law, technology, and science. What are they used for? To what extent do people understand and represent themselves and others as decision-makers? Where do decision-centric or “decisionist” understandings succeed? These aren't armchair, theoretical, philosophical questions, but empirical ones. Decision/choice concepts’ apparent ubiquity in contemporary societies calls for a well-thought-out research program on their social life and uses.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)237-264
    Number of pages28
    JournalBritish Journal of Sociology
    Volume69
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

    Fingerprint

    decisionism
    sociology
    decision maker
    business education
    decision-making process
    everyday life
    empirical research
    decision making
    Law
    politics
    science
    society

    Keywords

    • choice
    • culture
    • Decision
    • decision-maker
    • decision-making
    • Keith Jarrett
    • Luis Suárez
    • morality

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Outline of a sociology of decisionism. / Abend, Gabriel.

    In: British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 69, No. 2, 01.06.2018, p. 237-264.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abend, Gabriel. / Outline of a sociology of decisionism. In: British Journal of Sociology. 2018 ; Vol. 69, No. 2. pp. 237-264.
    @article{69b614266eb148a38b5908b97a8a1bcd,
    title = "Outline of a sociology of decisionism",
    abstract = "I propose an agenda for empirical research on decision, choice, decision-makers, and decision-making qua social facts. Given society S, group G, or field F, I make a twofold sociological proposal. First, empirically investigate the conditions under which something—call it X—is taken to be a decision or choice, or the outcome of a decision-making process. What must X be like? What doesn't count (besides, presumably, myotatic reflexes and blushing)? Whom or what must X be done by? What can't be a decision-maker (besides, presumably, rocks and apples)? Second, empirically investigate how decision/choice concepts are used in everyday life, politics, business, education, law, technology, and science. What are they used for? To what extent do people understand and represent themselves and others as decision-makers? Where do decision-centric or “decisionist” understandings succeed? These aren't armchair, theoretical, philosophical questions, but empirical ones. Decision/choice concepts’ apparent ubiquity in contemporary societies calls for a well-thought-out research program on their social life and uses.",
    keywords = "choice, culture, Decision, decision-maker, decision-making, Keith Jarrett, Luis Su{\'a}rez, morality",
    author = "Gabriel Abend",
    year = "2018",
    month = "6",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/1468-4446.12320",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "69",
    pages = "237--264",
    journal = "British Journal of Sociology",
    issn = "0007-1315",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Outline of a sociology of decisionism

    AU - Abend, Gabriel

    PY - 2018/6/1

    Y1 - 2018/6/1

    N2 - I propose an agenda for empirical research on decision, choice, decision-makers, and decision-making qua social facts. Given society S, group G, or field F, I make a twofold sociological proposal. First, empirically investigate the conditions under which something—call it X—is taken to be a decision or choice, or the outcome of a decision-making process. What must X be like? What doesn't count (besides, presumably, myotatic reflexes and blushing)? Whom or what must X be done by? What can't be a decision-maker (besides, presumably, rocks and apples)? Second, empirically investigate how decision/choice concepts are used in everyday life, politics, business, education, law, technology, and science. What are they used for? To what extent do people understand and represent themselves and others as decision-makers? Where do decision-centric or “decisionist” understandings succeed? These aren't armchair, theoretical, philosophical questions, but empirical ones. Decision/choice concepts’ apparent ubiquity in contemporary societies calls for a well-thought-out research program on their social life and uses.

    AB - I propose an agenda for empirical research on decision, choice, decision-makers, and decision-making qua social facts. Given society S, group G, or field F, I make a twofold sociological proposal. First, empirically investigate the conditions under which something—call it X—is taken to be a decision or choice, or the outcome of a decision-making process. What must X be like? What doesn't count (besides, presumably, myotatic reflexes and blushing)? Whom or what must X be done by? What can't be a decision-maker (besides, presumably, rocks and apples)? Second, empirically investigate how decision/choice concepts are used in everyday life, politics, business, education, law, technology, and science. What are they used for? To what extent do people understand and represent themselves and others as decision-makers? Where do decision-centric or “decisionist” understandings succeed? These aren't armchair, theoretical, philosophical questions, but empirical ones. Decision/choice concepts’ apparent ubiquity in contemporary societies calls for a well-thought-out research program on their social life and uses.

    KW - choice

    KW - culture

    KW - Decision

    KW - decision-maker

    KW - decision-making

    KW - Keith Jarrett

    KW - Luis Suárez

    KW - morality

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048373949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048373949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/1468-4446.12320

    DO - 10.1111/1468-4446.12320

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 29068536

    AN - SCOPUS:85048373949

    VL - 69

    SP - 237

    EP - 264

    JO - British Journal of Sociology

    JF - British Journal of Sociology

    SN - 0007-1315

    IS - 2

    ER -