Osseodensification for enhancement of spinal surgical hardware fixation

Christopher D. Lopez, Adham M. Alifarag, Andrea Torroni, Nick Tovar, J. Rodrigo Diaz-Siso, Lukasz Witek, Eduardo D. Rodriguez, Paulo Coelho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Integration between implant and bone is an essential concept for osseous healing requiring hardware placement. A novel approach to hardware implantation, termed osseodensification, is described here as an effective alternative. 12 sheep averaging 65 kg had fixation devices installed in their C2, C3, and C4 vertebral bodies; each device measured 4 mm diameter×10 mm length. The left-sided vertebral body devices were implanted using regular surgical drilling (R) while the right-sided devices were implanted using osseodensification drilling (OD). The C2 and C4 vertebra provided the t=0 in vivo time point, while the C3 vertebra provided the t=3 and t=6 week time points, in vivo. Structural competence of hardware was measured using biomechanical testing of pullout strength, while the quality and degree of new bone formation and remodeling was assessed via histomorphometry. Pullout strength demonstrated osseodensification drilling to provide superior anchoring when compared to the control group collapsed over time with statistical significance (p<0.01). On Wilcoxon rank signed test, C2 and C4 specimens demonstrated significance when comparing device pullout (p=0.031) for both, and C3 pullout tests at 3 and 6 weeks collapsed over time had significance as well (p=0.027). Percent bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) analysis as a function of drilling technique demonstrated an OD group with significantly higher values relative to the R group (p<0.01). Similarly, percent bone-area-fraction-occupancy (BAFO) analysis presented with significantly higher values for the OD group compared to the R group (p=0.024). As a function of time, between 0 and 3 weeks, a decrease in BAFO was observed, a trend that reversed between 3 and 6 weeks, resulting in a BAFO value roughly equivalent to the t=0 percentage, which was attributed to an initial loss of bone fraction due to remodeling, followed by regaining of bone fraction via production of woven bone. Histomorphological data demonstrated autologous bone chips in the OD group with greater frequency relative to the control, which acted as nucleating surfaces promoting new bone formation around the implants, providing superior stability and greater bone density. This alternative approach to a critical component of hardware implantation encourages assessment of current surgical approaches to hardware implantation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275-281
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Volume69
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

Bone
Hardware
Drilling
Testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomaterials
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials

Cite this

Osseodensification for enhancement of spinal surgical hardware fixation. / Lopez, Christopher D.; Alifarag, Adham M.; Torroni, Andrea; Tovar, Nick; Diaz-Siso, J. Rodrigo; Witek, Lukasz; Rodriguez, Eduardo D.; Coelho, Paulo.

In: Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, Vol. 69, 01.05.2017, p. 275-281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lopez, Christopher D. ; Alifarag, Adham M. ; Torroni, Andrea ; Tovar, Nick ; Diaz-Siso, J. Rodrigo ; Witek, Lukasz ; Rodriguez, Eduardo D. ; Coelho, Paulo. / Osseodensification for enhancement of spinal surgical hardware fixation. In: Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2017 ; Vol. 69. pp. 275-281.
@article{8229979982fc45b3938123880923275c,
title = "Osseodensification for enhancement of spinal surgical hardware fixation",
abstract = "Integration between implant and bone is an essential concept for osseous healing requiring hardware placement. A novel approach to hardware implantation, termed osseodensification, is described here as an effective alternative. 12 sheep averaging 65 kg had fixation devices installed in their C2, C3, and C4 vertebral bodies; each device measured 4 mm diameter×10 mm length. The left-sided vertebral body devices were implanted using regular surgical drilling (R) while the right-sided devices were implanted using osseodensification drilling (OD). The C2 and C4 vertebra provided the t=0 in vivo time point, while the C3 vertebra provided the t=3 and t=6 week time points, in vivo. Structural competence of hardware was measured using biomechanical testing of pullout strength, while the quality and degree of new bone formation and remodeling was assessed via histomorphometry. Pullout strength demonstrated osseodensification drilling to provide superior anchoring when compared to the control group collapsed over time with statistical significance (p<0.01). On Wilcoxon rank signed test, C2 and C4 specimens demonstrated significance when comparing device pullout (p=0.031) for both, and C3 pullout tests at 3 and 6 weeks collapsed over time had significance as well (p=0.027). Percent bone-to-implant contact ({\%}BIC) analysis as a function of drilling technique demonstrated an OD group with significantly higher values relative to the R group (p<0.01). Similarly, percent bone-area-fraction-occupancy (BAFO) analysis presented with significantly higher values for the OD group compared to the R group (p=0.024). As a function of time, between 0 and 3 weeks, a decrease in BAFO was observed, a trend that reversed between 3 and 6 weeks, resulting in a BAFO value roughly equivalent to the t=0 percentage, which was attributed to an initial loss of bone fraction due to remodeling, followed by regaining of bone fraction via production of woven bone. Histomorphological data demonstrated autologous bone chips in the OD group with greater frequency relative to the control, which acted as nucleating surfaces promoting new bone formation around the implants, providing superior stability and greater bone density. This alternative approach to a critical component of hardware implantation encourages assessment of current surgical approaches to hardware implantation.",
author = "Lopez, {Christopher D.} and Alifarag, {Adham M.} and Andrea Torroni and Nick Tovar and Diaz-Siso, {J. Rodrigo} and Lukasz Witek and Rodriguez, {Eduardo D.} and Paulo Coelho",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "275--281",
journal = "Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials",
issn = "1751-6161",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Osseodensification for enhancement of spinal surgical hardware fixation

AU - Lopez, Christopher D.

AU - Alifarag, Adham M.

AU - Torroni, Andrea

AU - Tovar, Nick

AU - Diaz-Siso, J. Rodrigo

AU - Witek, Lukasz

AU - Rodriguez, Eduardo D.

AU - Coelho, Paulo

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Integration between implant and bone is an essential concept for osseous healing requiring hardware placement. A novel approach to hardware implantation, termed osseodensification, is described here as an effective alternative. 12 sheep averaging 65 kg had fixation devices installed in their C2, C3, and C4 vertebral bodies; each device measured 4 mm diameter×10 mm length. The left-sided vertebral body devices were implanted using regular surgical drilling (R) while the right-sided devices were implanted using osseodensification drilling (OD). The C2 and C4 vertebra provided the t=0 in vivo time point, while the C3 vertebra provided the t=3 and t=6 week time points, in vivo. Structural competence of hardware was measured using biomechanical testing of pullout strength, while the quality and degree of new bone formation and remodeling was assessed via histomorphometry. Pullout strength demonstrated osseodensification drilling to provide superior anchoring when compared to the control group collapsed over time with statistical significance (p<0.01). On Wilcoxon rank signed test, C2 and C4 specimens demonstrated significance when comparing device pullout (p=0.031) for both, and C3 pullout tests at 3 and 6 weeks collapsed over time had significance as well (p=0.027). Percent bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) analysis as a function of drilling technique demonstrated an OD group with significantly higher values relative to the R group (p<0.01). Similarly, percent bone-area-fraction-occupancy (BAFO) analysis presented with significantly higher values for the OD group compared to the R group (p=0.024). As a function of time, between 0 and 3 weeks, a decrease in BAFO was observed, a trend that reversed between 3 and 6 weeks, resulting in a BAFO value roughly equivalent to the t=0 percentage, which was attributed to an initial loss of bone fraction due to remodeling, followed by regaining of bone fraction via production of woven bone. Histomorphological data demonstrated autologous bone chips in the OD group with greater frequency relative to the control, which acted as nucleating surfaces promoting new bone formation around the implants, providing superior stability and greater bone density. This alternative approach to a critical component of hardware implantation encourages assessment of current surgical approaches to hardware implantation.

AB - Integration between implant and bone is an essential concept for osseous healing requiring hardware placement. A novel approach to hardware implantation, termed osseodensification, is described here as an effective alternative. 12 sheep averaging 65 kg had fixation devices installed in their C2, C3, and C4 vertebral bodies; each device measured 4 mm diameter×10 mm length. The left-sided vertebral body devices were implanted using regular surgical drilling (R) while the right-sided devices were implanted using osseodensification drilling (OD). The C2 and C4 vertebra provided the t=0 in vivo time point, while the C3 vertebra provided the t=3 and t=6 week time points, in vivo. Structural competence of hardware was measured using biomechanical testing of pullout strength, while the quality and degree of new bone formation and remodeling was assessed via histomorphometry. Pullout strength demonstrated osseodensification drilling to provide superior anchoring when compared to the control group collapsed over time with statistical significance (p<0.01). On Wilcoxon rank signed test, C2 and C4 specimens demonstrated significance when comparing device pullout (p=0.031) for both, and C3 pullout tests at 3 and 6 weeks collapsed over time had significance as well (p=0.027). Percent bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) analysis as a function of drilling technique demonstrated an OD group with significantly higher values relative to the R group (p<0.01). Similarly, percent bone-area-fraction-occupancy (BAFO) analysis presented with significantly higher values for the OD group compared to the R group (p=0.024). As a function of time, between 0 and 3 weeks, a decrease in BAFO was observed, a trend that reversed between 3 and 6 weeks, resulting in a BAFO value roughly equivalent to the t=0 percentage, which was attributed to an initial loss of bone fraction due to remodeling, followed by regaining of bone fraction via production of woven bone. Histomorphological data demonstrated autologous bone chips in the OD group with greater frequency relative to the control, which acted as nucleating surfaces promoting new bone formation around the implants, providing superior stability and greater bone density. This alternative approach to a critical component of hardware implantation encourages assessment of current surgical approaches to hardware implantation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009851659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009851659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.020

DO - 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 28113132

AN - SCOPUS:85009851659

VL - 69

SP - 275

EP - 281

JO - Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

JF - Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

SN - 1751-6161

ER -