Organizational climate, staffing, and safety equipment as predictors of needlestick injuries and near-misses in hospital nurses

Sean Clarke, Joan L. Rockett, Douglas M. Sloane, Linda H. Aiken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Recently passed federal legislation requires institutions to adopt safety equipment to prevent needlesticks, but there is little empirical evidence of the effectiveness of specific types of safety devices or the contribution of safety devices to reducing needlesticks relative to the contributions of staffing, organizational climate, and clinicians’ experience. Method: In 1998, 2287 medical-surgical unit nurses in 22 US hospitals were surveyed in regard to staffing and organizational climate in their hospitals and about patient and nurse outcomes, including needlestick injuries. Hospitals provided information about available protective devices at the time of the survey. Relationships between nurse and hospital characteristics and protective equipment and the likelihood of needlestick injuries and near-miss incidents were examined. Results: Poor organizational climate and high workloads were associated with 50% to 2-fold increases in the likelihood of needlestick injuries and near-misses to hospital nurses. Capless-valve secondary intravenous set systems and use of any type of protective equipment for IV starts or blood draws were associated with 20% to 30% lowered risks of both event types. Conclusions: Nurse staffing and organizational climate are key determinants of needlestick risk and must be considered with the adoption of safety equipment to effectively reduce sharps injuries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-216
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Infection Control
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Equipment Safety
Needlestick Injuries
Nurses
Protective Devices
Equipment and Supplies
Workload
Legislation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Organizational climate, staffing, and safety equipment as predictors of needlestick injuries and near-misses in hospital nurses. / Clarke, Sean; Rockett, Joan L.; Sloane, Douglas M.; Aiken, Linda H.

In: American Journal of Infection Control, Vol. 30, No. 4, 01.01.2002, p. 207-216.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{968a128854a144369ea66141ded6854d,
title = "Organizational climate, staffing, and safety equipment as predictors of needlestick injuries and near-misses in hospital nurses",
abstract = "Background: Recently passed federal legislation requires institutions to adopt safety equipment to prevent needlesticks, but there is little empirical evidence of the effectiveness of specific types of safety devices or the contribution of safety devices to reducing needlesticks relative to the contributions of staffing, organizational climate, and clinicians’ experience. Method: In 1998, 2287 medical-surgical unit nurses in 22 US hospitals were surveyed in regard to staffing and organizational climate in their hospitals and about patient and nurse outcomes, including needlestick injuries. Hospitals provided information about available protective devices at the time of the survey. Relationships between nurse and hospital characteristics and protective equipment and the likelihood of needlestick injuries and near-miss incidents were examined. Results: Poor organizational climate and high workloads were associated with 50{\%} to 2-fold increases in the likelihood of needlestick injuries and near-misses to hospital nurses. Capless-valve secondary intravenous set systems and use of any type of protective equipment for IV starts or blood draws were associated with 20{\%} to 30{\%} lowered risks of both event types. Conclusions: Nurse staffing and organizational climate are key determinants of needlestick risk and must be considered with the adoption of safety equipment to effectively reduce sharps injuries.",
author = "Sean Clarke and Rockett, {Joan L.} and Sloane, {Douglas M.} and Aiken, {Linda H.}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1067/mic.2002.123392",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "207--216",
journal = "American Journal of Infection Control",
issn = "0196-6553",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizational climate, staffing, and safety equipment as predictors of needlestick injuries and near-misses in hospital nurses

AU - Clarke, Sean

AU - Rockett, Joan L.

AU - Sloane, Douglas M.

AU - Aiken, Linda H.

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Background: Recently passed federal legislation requires institutions to adopt safety equipment to prevent needlesticks, but there is little empirical evidence of the effectiveness of specific types of safety devices or the contribution of safety devices to reducing needlesticks relative to the contributions of staffing, organizational climate, and clinicians’ experience. Method: In 1998, 2287 medical-surgical unit nurses in 22 US hospitals were surveyed in regard to staffing and organizational climate in their hospitals and about patient and nurse outcomes, including needlestick injuries. Hospitals provided information about available protective devices at the time of the survey. Relationships between nurse and hospital characteristics and protective equipment and the likelihood of needlestick injuries and near-miss incidents were examined. Results: Poor organizational climate and high workloads were associated with 50% to 2-fold increases in the likelihood of needlestick injuries and near-misses to hospital nurses. Capless-valve secondary intravenous set systems and use of any type of protective equipment for IV starts or blood draws were associated with 20% to 30% lowered risks of both event types. Conclusions: Nurse staffing and organizational climate are key determinants of needlestick risk and must be considered with the adoption of safety equipment to effectively reduce sharps injuries.

AB - Background: Recently passed federal legislation requires institutions to adopt safety equipment to prevent needlesticks, but there is little empirical evidence of the effectiveness of specific types of safety devices or the contribution of safety devices to reducing needlesticks relative to the contributions of staffing, organizational climate, and clinicians’ experience. Method: In 1998, 2287 medical-surgical unit nurses in 22 US hospitals were surveyed in regard to staffing and organizational climate in their hospitals and about patient and nurse outcomes, including needlestick injuries. Hospitals provided information about available protective devices at the time of the survey. Relationships between nurse and hospital characteristics and protective equipment and the likelihood of needlestick injuries and near-miss incidents were examined. Results: Poor organizational climate and high workloads were associated with 50% to 2-fold increases in the likelihood of needlestick injuries and near-misses to hospital nurses. Capless-valve secondary intravenous set systems and use of any type of protective equipment for IV starts or blood draws were associated with 20% to 30% lowered risks of both event types. Conclusions: Nurse staffing and organizational climate are key determinants of needlestick risk and must be considered with the adoption of safety equipment to effectively reduce sharps injuries.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036264290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036264290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/mic.2002.123392

DO - 10.1067/mic.2002.123392

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 207

EP - 216

JO - American Journal of Infection Control

JF - American Journal of Infection Control

SN - 0196-6553

IS - 4

ER -