Oral mucosal wetness in hypo- and normosalivators

Mark Wolff, I. Kleinberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

After a person swallows, a film of residual saliva covers the oral hard- and soft-tissue surfaces. Here, the thickness of this film was measured at 11 selected mucosal surfaces on each side of the mouth (22 sites total) in two groups of dry-mouth and one group of normal individuals. Each group contained 25 individuals; one of the dry-mouth groups had resting flow rates ≤0.1 ml/min while the other and the normal had flow rates above that. Residual saliva thickness was determined by placing frying-pan-shaped filter- paper strips (Sialopaper(TM)) against the mucosa at each site for 5 s and measuring the saliva volume collected with a modified Periorton 6000(R) micromoisture meter; the thickness was then calculated by dividing the collected saliva volume by the strip area. The two groups with dry-mouth symptoms had mean resting (unstimulated) saliva flow rates of 0.04 and 0.19 ml/min and mean mucosal saliva thicknesses of 22.4 and 27.8 μm, respectively. The control group had a higher mean saliva flow rate of 0.39 ml/min and mucosal saliva thickness of 41.8 μm. As was observed in a previous study on normo salivators, the various sites had a characteristic pattern of wetness, with the hard palate and lips the least moist regions. In this study, these observations were also true in the two dry-mouth groups. Lower resting saliva flow rates were associated with lower mucosal thickness of saliva and with dryness symptoms becoming evident when hyposalivation was below about 0.1-0.2 ml/min. The characteristic pattern of mucosal wetness was not affected by saliva flow rate. As saliva readily collects in the floor of the mouth and is then spread over other mucosal surfaces upon swallowing, it was suggested that hyposalivation could also lead to the dryness symptoms because there was not enough saliva to cover the various oral surfaces, especially the palate and the lips. In this regard, a critical level of moisture was proposed as necessary to protect vulnerable mucosal surfaces from becoming dry. Lower resting saliva flow rates and correspondingly lower mucosal wetness were also associated with a more acidic salivary pH, which was shown earlier to be associated with lower dental plaque pH.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)455-462
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Oral Biology
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 1998

Fingerprint

Saliva
Mouth
Xerostomia
Lip
Swallows
Hard Palate
Mouth Floor
Dental Plaque
Palate
Deglutition
Mucous Membrane

Keywords

  • Dry mouth
  • Mucosal wetness
  • Residual saliva
  • Saliva films

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Oral mucosal wetness in hypo- and normosalivators. / Wolff, Mark; Kleinberg, I.

In: Archives of Oral Biology, Vol. 43, No. 6, 01.06.1998, p. 455-462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wolff, Mark ; Kleinberg, I. / Oral mucosal wetness in hypo- and normosalivators. In: Archives of Oral Biology. 1998 ; Vol. 43, No. 6. pp. 455-462.
@article{4e9ef7c95b13407db8e72d5519e69678,
title = "Oral mucosal wetness in hypo- and normosalivators",
abstract = "After a person swallows, a film of residual saliva covers the oral hard- and soft-tissue surfaces. Here, the thickness of this film was measured at 11 selected mucosal surfaces on each side of the mouth (22 sites total) in two groups of dry-mouth and one group of normal individuals. Each group contained 25 individuals; one of the dry-mouth groups had resting flow rates ≤0.1 ml/min while the other and the normal had flow rates above that. Residual saliva thickness was determined by placing frying-pan-shaped filter- paper strips (Sialopaper(TM)) against the mucosa at each site for 5 s and measuring the saliva volume collected with a modified Periorton 6000(R) micromoisture meter; the thickness was then calculated by dividing the collected saliva volume by the strip area. The two groups with dry-mouth symptoms had mean resting (unstimulated) saliva flow rates of 0.04 and 0.19 ml/min and mean mucosal saliva thicknesses of 22.4 and 27.8 μm, respectively. The control group had a higher mean saliva flow rate of 0.39 ml/min and mucosal saliva thickness of 41.8 μm. As was observed in a previous study on normo salivators, the various sites had a characteristic pattern of wetness, with the hard palate and lips the least moist regions. In this study, these observations were also true in the two dry-mouth groups. Lower resting saliva flow rates were associated with lower mucosal thickness of saliva and with dryness symptoms becoming evident when hyposalivation was below about 0.1-0.2 ml/min. The characteristic pattern of mucosal wetness was not affected by saliva flow rate. As saliva readily collects in the floor of the mouth and is then spread over other mucosal surfaces upon swallowing, it was suggested that hyposalivation could also lead to the dryness symptoms because there was not enough saliva to cover the various oral surfaces, especially the palate and the lips. In this regard, a critical level of moisture was proposed as necessary to protect vulnerable mucosal surfaces from becoming dry. Lower resting saliva flow rates and correspondingly lower mucosal wetness were also associated with a more acidic salivary pH, which was shown earlier to be associated with lower dental plaque pH.",
keywords = "Dry mouth, Mucosal wetness, Residual saliva, Saliva films",
author = "Mark Wolff and I. Kleinberg",
year = "1998",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0003-9969(98)00022-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "455--462",
journal = "Archives of Oral Biology",
issn = "0003-9969",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oral mucosal wetness in hypo- and normosalivators

AU - Wolff, Mark

AU - Kleinberg, I.

PY - 1998/6/1

Y1 - 1998/6/1

N2 - After a person swallows, a film of residual saliva covers the oral hard- and soft-tissue surfaces. Here, the thickness of this film was measured at 11 selected mucosal surfaces on each side of the mouth (22 sites total) in two groups of dry-mouth and one group of normal individuals. Each group contained 25 individuals; one of the dry-mouth groups had resting flow rates ≤0.1 ml/min while the other and the normal had flow rates above that. Residual saliva thickness was determined by placing frying-pan-shaped filter- paper strips (Sialopaper(TM)) against the mucosa at each site for 5 s and measuring the saliva volume collected with a modified Periorton 6000(R) micromoisture meter; the thickness was then calculated by dividing the collected saliva volume by the strip area. The two groups with dry-mouth symptoms had mean resting (unstimulated) saliva flow rates of 0.04 and 0.19 ml/min and mean mucosal saliva thicknesses of 22.4 and 27.8 μm, respectively. The control group had a higher mean saliva flow rate of 0.39 ml/min and mucosal saliva thickness of 41.8 μm. As was observed in a previous study on normo salivators, the various sites had a characteristic pattern of wetness, with the hard palate and lips the least moist regions. In this study, these observations were also true in the two dry-mouth groups. Lower resting saliva flow rates were associated with lower mucosal thickness of saliva and with dryness symptoms becoming evident when hyposalivation was below about 0.1-0.2 ml/min. The characteristic pattern of mucosal wetness was not affected by saliva flow rate. As saliva readily collects in the floor of the mouth and is then spread over other mucosal surfaces upon swallowing, it was suggested that hyposalivation could also lead to the dryness symptoms because there was not enough saliva to cover the various oral surfaces, especially the palate and the lips. In this regard, a critical level of moisture was proposed as necessary to protect vulnerable mucosal surfaces from becoming dry. Lower resting saliva flow rates and correspondingly lower mucosal wetness were also associated with a more acidic salivary pH, which was shown earlier to be associated with lower dental plaque pH.

AB - After a person swallows, a film of residual saliva covers the oral hard- and soft-tissue surfaces. Here, the thickness of this film was measured at 11 selected mucosal surfaces on each side of the mouth (22 sites total) in two groups of dry-mouth and one group of normal individuals. Each group contained 25 individuals; one of the dry-mouth groups had resting flow rates ≤0.1 ml/min while the other and the normal had flow rates above that. Residual saliva thickness was determined by placing frying-pan-shaped filter- paper strips (Sialopaper(TM)) against the mucosa at each site for 5 s and measuring the saliva volume collected with a modified Periorton 6000(R) micromoisture meter; the thickness was then calculated by dividing the collected saliva volume by the strip area. The two groups with dry-mouth symptoms had mean resting (unstimulated) saliva flow rates of 0.04 and 0.19 ml/min and mean mucosal saliva thicknesses of 22.4 and 27.8 μm, respectively. The control group had a higher mean saliva flow rate of 0.39 ml/min and mucosal saliva thickness of 41.8 μm. As was observed in a previous study on normo salivators, the various sites had a characteristic pattern of wetness, with the hard palate and lips the least moist regions. In this study, these observations were also true in the two dry-mouth groups. Lower resting saliva flow rates were associated with lower mucosal thickness of saliva and with dryness symptoms becoming evident when hyposalivation was below about 0.1-0.2 ml/min. The characteristic pattern of mucosal wetness was not affected by saliva flow rate. As saliva readily collects in the floor of the mouth and is then spread over other mucosal surfaces upon swallowing, it was suggested that hyposalivation could also lead to the dryness symptoms because there was not enough saliva to cover the various oral surfaces, especially the palate and the lips. In this regard, a critical level of moisture was proposed as necessary to protect vulnerable mucosal surfaces from becoming dry. Lower resting saliva flow rates and correspondingly lower mucosal wetness were also associated with a more acidic salivary pH, which was shown earlier to be associated with lower dental plaque pH.

KW - Dry mouth

KW - Mucosal wetness

KW - Residual saliva

KW - Saliva films

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032102814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032102814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0003-9969(98)00022-3

DO - 10.1016/S0003-9969(98)00022-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 9717583

AN - SCOPUS:0032102814

VL - 43

SP - 455

EP - 462

JO - Archives of Oral Biology

JF - Archives of Oral Biology

SN - 0003-9969

IS - 6

ER -