Options for dialing down from single payer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There are formidable institutional obstacles to passing a single-payer health program in the United States. Advocates should consider incremental improvements that may better match legislative realities. There are three potential directions for incremental coverage policy. One possibility is to build on the successes of the Affordable Care Act; this might include rolling back regulatory changes, further incentivizing Medicaid expansion, enhancing coverage in the Affordable Care Act marketplaces, and imposing regulations on private employer-based insurance to ensure that all Americans have access to affordable coverage that provides adequate financial security. A second direction is to offer more publicly sponsored insurance options, which might involve offering a public option to those eligible for marketplace coverage, creating a Medicare or Medicaid buy-in program, lowering the eligibility age for Medicare, or developing a public plan that serves as adefault for those who do not choose to buy alternative private coverage. A third direction is to build on federalism, offering states incentives to expand coverage. Federal and state legislators could also consider incremental cost-containment steps, such as rate setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1517-1520
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican journal of public health
Volume109
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Medicaid
Medicare
Insurance
Cost Control
Motivation
Health
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Options for dialing down from single payer. / Glied, Sharon.

In: American journal of public health, Vol. 109, No. 11, 01.01.2019, p. 1517-1520.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{843a02dd6cf840ca988bc07a13e16db4,
title = "Options for dialing down from single payer",
abstract = "There are formidable institutional obstacles to passing a single-payer health program in the United States. Advocates should consider incremental improvements that may better match legislative realities. There are three potential directions for incremental coverage policy. One possibility is to build on the successes of the Affordable Care Act; this might include rolling back regulatory changes, further incentivizing Medicaid expansion, enhancing coverage in the Affordable Care Act marketplaces, and imposing regulations on private employer-based insurance to ensure that all Americans have access to affordable coverage that provides adequate financial security. A second direction is to offer more publicly sponsored insurance options, which might involve offering a public option to those eligible for marketplace coverage, creating a Medicare or Medicaid buy-in program, lowering the eligibility age for Medicare, or developing a public plan that serves as adefault for those who do not choose to buy alternative private coverage. A third direction is to build on federalism, offering states incentives to expand coverage. Federal and state legislators could also consider incremental cost-containment steps, such as rate setting.",
author = "Sharon Glied",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2019.305299",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "109",
pages = "1517--1520",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Options for dialing down from single payer

AU - Glied, Sharon

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - There are formidable institutional obstacles to passing a single-payer health program in the United States. Advocates should consider incremental improvements that may better match legislative realities. There are three potential directions for incremental coverage policy. One possibility is to build on the successes of the Affordable Care Act; this might include rolling back regulatory changes, further incentivizing Medicaid expansion, enhancing coverage in the Affordable Care Act marketplaces, and imposing regulations on private employer-based insurance to ensure that all Americans have access to affordable coverage that provides adequate financial security. A second direction is to offer more publicly sponsored insurance options, which might involve offering a public option to those eligible for marketplace coverage, creating a Medicare or Medicaid buy-in program, lowering the eligibility age for Medicare, or developing a public plan that serves as adefault for those who do not choose to buy alternative private coverage. A third direction is to build on federalism, offering states incentives to expand coverage. Federal and state legislators could also consider incremental cost-containment steps, such as rate setting.

AB - There are formidable institutional obstacles to passing a single-payer health program in the United States. Advocates should consider incremental improvements that may better match legislative realities. There are three potential directions for incremental coverage policy. One possibility is to build on the successes of the Affordable Care Act; this might include rolling back regulatory changes, further incentivizing Medicaid expansion, enhancing coverage in the Affordable Care Act marketplaces, and imposing regulations on private employer-based insurance to ensure that all Americans have access to affordable coverage that provides adequate financial security. A second direction is to offer more publicly sponsored insurance options, which might involve offering a public option to those eligible for marketplace coverage, creating a Medicare or Medicaid buy-in program, lowering the eligibility age for Medicare, or developing a public plan that serves as adefault for those who do not choose to buy alternative private coverage. A third direction is to build on federalism, offering states incentives to expand coverage. Federal and state legislators could also consider incremental cost-containment steps, such as rate setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072903488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072903488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305299

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305299

M3 - Article

C2 - 31536411

AN - SCOPUS:85072903488

VL - 109

SP - 1517

EP - 1520

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 11

ER -