Optimal compensation for changes in task-relevant movement variability

Julia Trommershäuser, Sergei Gepshtein, Laurence T. Maloney, Michael S. Landy, Martin S. Banks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Effective movement planning should take into account the consequences of possible errors in executing a planned movement. These errors can result from either sensory uncertainty or variability in movement planning and production. We examined the ability of humans to compensate for variability in sensory estimation and movement production under conditions in which variability is increased artificially by the experimenter. Subjects rapidly pointed at a target region that had an adjacent penalty region. Target and penalty hits yielded monetary rewards and losses. We manipulated the task-relevant variability by perturbing visual feedback of finger position during the movement. The feedback was shifted in a random direction with a random amplitude in each trial, causing an increase in the task-relevant variability. Subjects were unable to counteract this form of perturbation. Rewards and penalties were based on the perturbed, visually specified finger position. Subjects rapidly acquired an estimate of their new variability in <120 trials and adjusted their aim points accordingly. We compared subjects' performance to the performance of an optimal movement planner maximizing expected gain. Their performance was consistent with that expected from an optimal movement planner that perfectly compensated for externally imposed changes in task-relevant variability. When exposed to novel stimulus configurations, aim points shifted in the first trial without showing any detectable trend across trials. These results indicate that subjects are capable of changing their pointing strategy in the presence of externally imposed noise. Furthermore, they manage to update their estimate of task-relevant variability and to transfer this estimate to novel stimulus configurations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7169-7178
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume25
Issue number31
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 3 2005

Fingerprint

Reward
Fingers
Sensory Feedback
Aptitude
Uncertainty
Noise
Direction compound
Transfer (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Movement planning
  • Movement under risk
  • Optimality
  • Statistical decision theory
  • Visuomotor control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Optimal compensation for changes in task-relevant movement variability. / Trommershäuser, Julia; Gepshtein, Sergei; Maloney, Laurence T.; Landy, Michael S.; Banks, Martin S.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 25, No. 31, 03.08.2005, p. 7169-7178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trommershäuser, Julia ; Gepshtein, Sergei ; Maloney, Laurence T. ; Landy, Michael S. ; Banks, Martin S. / Optimal compensation for changes in task-relevant movement variability. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 2005 ; Vol. 25, No. 31. pp. 7169-7178.
@article{dcde2c3a6a354eb3b2550c2ed52d3cc1,
title = "Optimal compensation for changes in task-relevant movement variability",
abstract = "Effective movement planning should take into account the consequences of possible errors in executing a planned movement. These errors can result from either sensory uncertainty or variability in movement planning and production. We examined the ability of humans to compensate for variability in sensory estimation and movement production under conditions in which variability is increased artificially by the experimenter. Subjects rapidly pointed at a target region that had an adjacent penalty region. Target and penalty hits yielded monetary rewards and losses. We manipulated the task-relevant variability by perturbing visual feedback of finger position during the movement. The feedback was shifted in a random direction with a random amplitude in each trial, causing an increase in the task-relevant variability. Subjects were unable to counteract this form of perturbation. Rewards and penalties were based on the perturbed, visually specified finger position. Subjects rapidly acquired an estimate of their new variability in <120 trials and adjusted their aim points accordingly. We compared subjects' performance to the performance of an optimal movement planner maximizing expected gain. Their performance was consistent with that expected from an optimal movement planner that perfectly compensated for externally imposed changes in task-relevant variability. When exposed to novel stimulus configurations, aim points shifted in the first trial without showing any detectable trend across trials. These results indicate that subjects are capable of changing their pointing strategy in the presence of externally imposed noise. Furthermore, they manage to update their estimate of task-relevant variability and to transfer this estimate to novel stimulus configurations.",
keywords = "Decision making, Movement planning, Movement under risk, Optimality, Statistical decision theory, Visuomotor control",
author = "Julia Trommersh{\"a}user and Sergei Gepshtein and Maloney, {Laurence T.} and Landy, {Michael S.} and Banks, {Martin S.}",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1906-05.2005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "7169--7178",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "31",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal compensation for changes in task-relevant movement variability

AU - Trommershäuser, Julia

AU - Gepshtein, Sergei

AU - Maloney, Laurence T.

AU - Landy, Michael S.

AU - Banks, Martin S.

PY - 2005/8/3

Y1 - 2005/8/3

N2 - Effective movement planning should take into account the consequences of possible errors in executing a planned movement. These errors can result from either sensory uncertainty or variability in movement planning and production. We examined the ability of humans to compensate for variability in sensory estimation and movement production under conditions in which variability is increased artificially by the experimenter. Subjects rapidly pointed at a target region that had an adjacent penalty region. Target and penalty hits yielded monetary rewards and losses. We manipulated the task-relevant variability by perturbing visual feedback of finger position during the movement. The feedback was shifted in a random direction with a random amplitude in each trial, causing an increase in the task-relevant variability. Subjects were unable to counteract this form of perturbation. Rewards and penalties were based on the perturbed, visually specified finger position. Subjects rapidly acquired an estimate of their new variability in <120 trials and adjusted their aim points accordingly. We compared subjects' performance to the performance of an optimal movement planner maximizing expected gain. Their performance was consistent with that expected from an optimal movement planner that perfectly compensated for externally imposed changes in task-relevant variability. When exposed to novel stimulus configurations, aim points shifted in the first trial without showing any detectable trend across trials. These results indicate that subjects are capable of changing their pointing strategy in the presence of externally imposed noise. Furthermore, they manage to update their estimate of task-relevant variability and to transfer this estimate to novel stimulus configurations.

AB - Effective movement planning should take into account the consequences of possible errors in executing a planned movement. These errors can result from either sensory uncertainty or variability in movement planning and production. We examined the ability of humans to compensate for variability in sensory estimation and movement production under conditions in which variability is increased artificially by the experimenter. Subjects rapidly pointed at a target region that had an adjacent penalty region. Target and penalty hits yielded monetary rewards and losses. We manipulated the task-relevant variability by perturbing visual feedback of finger position during the movement. The feedback was shifted in a random direction with a random amplitude in each trial, causing an increase in the task-relevant variability. Subjects were unable to counteract this form of perturbation. Rewards and penalties were based on the perturbed, visually specified finger position. Subjects rapidly acquired an estimate of their new variability in <120 trials and adjusted their aim points accordingly. We compared subjects' performance to the performance of an optimal movement planner maximizing expected gain. Their performance was consistent with that expected from an optimal movement planner that perfectly compensated for externally imposed changes in task-relevant variability. When exposed to novel stimulus configurations, aim points shifted in the first trial without showing any detectable trend across trials. These results indicate that subjects are capable of changing their pointing strategy in the presence of externally imposed noise. Furthermore, they manage to update their estimate of task-relevant variability and to transfer this estimate to novel stimulus configurations.

KW - Decision making

KW - Movement planning

KW - Movement under risk

KW - Optimality

KW - Statistical decision theory

KW - Visuomotor control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23444433090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23444433090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1906-05.2005

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1906-05.2005

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 7169

EP - 7178

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 31

ER -