Optimal combination of the binocular cues to 3D motion

Brian Allen, Andrew M. Haun, Taylor Hanley, C. Shawn Green, Bas Rokers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE. Perception necessarily entails combining separate sensory estimates into a single coherent whole. The perception of three-dimensional (3D) motion, for instance, can rely on two binocular cues: one related to the change in binocular disparity over time (CD) and the other related to interocular velocity differences (IOVD). Although previous work has shown that neither cue is strictly necessary for the perception of 3D motion, observers are able to judge 3D motion in displays in which one or the other cue has been eliminated, it is unclear whether or how the two cues are combined in situations in which both are present. METHODS. We tested the visual performance of a sample of 81 individuals (Mage = 20.34, 49 females) in four main conditions that measured, respectively, static stereoacuity, CD, IOVD, and combined CD+IOVD sensitivity. RESULTS. We show that the sensitivity to the two binocular cues to 3D motion varies substantially across observers (CD: Md’ = 1.01, SDd’ = 1.1; IOVD: Md’ = 1.16, SDd’ = 1.03). Furthermore, sensitivity to the two cues was independent across observers (r[48] = 0.12, P = 0.42). Importantly, however, observed CD+IOVD performance was well-predicted based on the assumption that each observer combines the two cues in a statistically optimal fashion (r[79] = 0.75, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS. Our findings provide an explanation for the previously puzzling variability found in 3D perception across observers and laboratories, with some results suggesting that motionin- depth percepts are largely determined by changes in binocular disparity, whereas others indicate that interocular velocity differences are key. Our results underline the existence of two complementary binocular mechanisms underlying 3D motion perception, with observers relying on these two mechanisms to different extents depending on their individual sensitivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7589-7596
Number of pages8
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume56
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Cues
Vision Disparity
Motion Perception

Keywords

  • 3D motion
  • Changing disparity
  • Cue combination
  • Interocular velocity differences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Allen, B., Haun, A. M., Hanley, T., Green, C. S., & Rokers, B. (2015). Optimal combination of the binocular cues to 3D motion. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 56(12), 7589-7596. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-17696

Optimal combination of the binocular cues to 3D motion. / Allen, Brian; Haun, Andrew M.; Hanley, Taylor; Green, C. Shawn; Rokers, Bas.

In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 56, No. 12, 01.11.2015, p. 7589-7596.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Allen, B, Haun, AM, Hanley, T, Green, CS & Rokers, B 2015, 'Optimal combination of the binocular cues to 3D motion', Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 7589-7596. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-17696
Allen, Brian ; Haun, Andrew M. ; Hanley, Taylor ; Green, C. Shawn ; Rokers, Bas. / Optimal combination of the binocular cues to 3D motion. In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2015 ; Vol. 56, No. 12. pp. 7589-7596.
@article{aadac563e6eb43529a5bba2497b2245b,
title = "Optimal combination of the binocular cues to 3D motion",
abstract = "PURPOSE. Perception necessarily entails combining separate sensory estimates into a single coherent whole. The perception of three-dimensional (3D) motion, for instance, can rely on two binocular cues: one related to the change in binocular disparity over time (CD) and the other related to interocular velocity differences (IOVD). Although previous work has shown that neither cue is strictly necessary for the perception of 3D motion, observers are able to judge 3D motion in displays in which one or the other cue has been eliminated, it is unclear whether or how the two cues are combined in situations in which both are present. METHODS. We tested the visual performance of a sample of 81 individuals (Mage = 20.34, 49 females) in four main conditions that measured, respectively, static stereoacuity, CD, IOVD, and combined CD+IOVD sensitivity. RESULTS. We show that the sensitivity to the two binocular cues to 3D motion varies substantially across observers (CD: Md’ = 1.01, SDd’ = 1.1; IOVD: Md’ = 1.16, SDd’ = 1.03). Furthermore, sensitivity to the two cues was independent across observers (r[48] = 0.12, P = 0.42). Importantly, however, observed CD+IOVD performance was well-predicted based on the assumption that each observer combines the two cues in a statistically optimal fashion (r[79] = 0.75, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS. Our findings provide an explanation for the previously puzzling variability found in 3D perception across observers and laboratories, with some results suggesting that motionin- depth percepts are largely determined by changes in binocular disparity, whereas others indicate that interocular velocity differences are key. Our results underline the existence of two complementary binocular mechanisms underlying 3D motion perception, with observers relying on these two mechanisms to different extents depending on their individual sensitivity.",
keywords = "3D motion, Changing disparity, Cue combination, Interocular velocity differences",
author = "Brian Allen and Haun, {Andrew M.} and Taylor Hanley and Green, {C. Shawn} and Bas Rokers",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1167/iovs.15-17696",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "7589--7596",
journal = "Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science",
issn = "0146-0404",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal combination of the binocular cues to 3D motion

AU - Allen, Brian

AU - Haun, Andrew M.

AU - Hanley, Taylor

AU - Green, C. Shawn

AU - Rokers, Bas

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - PURPOSE. Perception necessarily entails combining separate sensory estimates into a single coherent whole. The perception of three-dimensional (3D) motion, for instance, can rely on two binocular cues: one related to the change in binocular disparity over time (CD) and the other related to interocular velocity differences (IOVD). Although previous work has shown that neither cue is strictly necessary for the perception of 3D motion, observers are able to judge 3D motion in displays in which one or the other cue has been eliminated, it is unclear whether or how the two cues are combined in situations in which both are present. METHODS. We tested the visual performance of a sample of 81 individuals (Mage = 20.34, 49 females) in four main conditions that measured, respectively, static stereoacuity, CD, IOVD, and combined CD+IOVD sensitivity. RESULTS. We show that the sensitivity to the two binocular cues to 3D motion varies substantially across observers (CD: Md’ = 1.01, SDd’ = 1.1; IOVD: Md’ = 1.16, SDd’ = 1.03). Furthermore, sensitivity to the two cues was independent across observers (r[48] = 0.12, P = 0.42). Importantly, however, observed CD+IOVD performance was well-predicted based on the assumption that each observer combines the two cues in a statistically optimal fashion (r[79] = 0.75, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS. Our findings provide an explanation for the previously puzzling variability found in 3D perception across observers and laboratories, with some results suggesting that motionin- depth percepts are largely determined by changes in binocular disparity, whereas others indicate that interocular velocity differences are key. Our results underline the existence of two complementary binocular mechanisms underlying 3D motion perception, with observers relying on these two mechanisms to different extents depending on their individual sensitivity.

AB - PURPOSE. Perception necessarily entails combining separate sensory estimates into a single coherent whole. The perception of three-dimensional (3D) motion, for instance, can rely on two binocular cues: one related to the change in binocular disparity over time (CD) and the other related to interocular velocity differences (IOVD). Although previous work has shown that neither cue is strictly necessary for the perception of 3D motion, observers are able to judge 3D motion in displays in which one or the other cue has been eliminated, it is unclear whether or how the two cues are combined in situations in which both are present. METHODS. We tested the visual performance of a sample of 81 individuals (Mage = 20.34, 49 females) in four main conditions that measured, respectively, static stereoacuity, CD, IOVD, and combined CD+IOVD sensitivity. RESULTS. We show that the sensitivity to the two binocular cues to 3D motion varies substantially across observers (CD: Md’ = 1.01, SDd’ = 1.1; IOVD: Md’ = 1.16, SDd’ = 1.03). Furthermore, sensitivity to the two cues was independent across observers (r[48] = 0.12, P = 0.42). Importantly, however, observed CD+IOVD performance was well-predicted based on the assumption that each observer combines the two cues in a statistically optimal fashion (r[79] = 0.75, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS. Our findings provide an explanation for the previously puzzling variability found in 3D perception across observers and laboratories, with some results suggesting that motionin- depth percepts are largely determined by changes in binocular disparity, whereas others indicate that interocular velocity differences are key. Our results underline the existence of two complementary binocular mechanisms underlying 3D motion perception, with observers relying on these two mechanisms to different extents depending on their individual sensitivity.

KW - 3D motion

KW - Changing disparity

KW - Cue combination

KW - Interocular velocity differences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982720632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982720632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/iovs.15-17696

DO - 10.1167/iovs.15-17696

M3 - Article

C2 - 26618651

AN - SCOPUS:84982720632

VL - 56

SP - 7589

EP - 7596

JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

SN - 0146-0404

IS - 12

ER -