Abstract
Criteria that aim to dichotomize cognition into rules and similarity are destined to fail because rules and similarity are not in genuine conflict. It is possible for a given cognitive domain to exploit rules without similarity, similarity without rules, or both (rules and similarity) at the same time.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 28-29 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - Feb 2005 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Neuroscience(all)
- Psychology(all)
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Cite this
Opposites detract : Why rules and similarity should not be viewed as opposite ends of a continuum. / Marcus, Gary.
In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 28, No. 1, 02.2005, p. 28-29.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Opposites detract
T2 - Why rules and similarity should not be viewed as opposite ends of a continuum
AU - Marcus, Gary
PY - 2005/2
Y1 - 2005/2
N2 - Criteria that aim to dichotomize cognition into rules and similarity are destined to fail because rules and similarity are not in genuine conflict. It is possible for a given cognitive domain to exploit rules without similarity, similarity without rules, or both (rules and similarity) at the same time.
AB - Criteria that aim to dichotomize cognition into rules and similarity are destined to fail because rules and similarity are not in genuine conflict. It is possible for a given cognitive domain to exploit rules without similarity, similarity without rules, or both (rules and similarity) at the same time.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21644449438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21644449438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:21644449438
VL - 28
SP - 28
EP - 29
JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
SN - 0140-525X
IS - 1
ER -