Ontogenetic scaling and lithic systematics

method and application

Radu Iovita

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Stone tools tend to be classified according to a mix of functional, morphological, and technological attributes. This practice results in confusions when large-scale assemblage comparisons are made with the aim of investigating phylogenetic relationships, as functional and cultural information is aggregated. It is argued here that functional criteria must be assessed separately, and that resharpening, as a uniform, repeated, conscious behavioral process of tool maintenance that indexes use and function, can provide a solution to this problem. The subject of this article is a quantitative method for extracting and comparing resharpening trajectories. The method is an adaptation of ontogenetic scaling methods from biology, and is based on obtaining a mathematical representation of shape and size, and finding a relationship between the two. Elliptical Fourier analysis is applied to stone tool contours in order to extract shape information, and then a series of regressions of shape on size provide trajectory vectors. The angles between these are then calculated and subjected to a variety of multivariate statistical tests. A case study involving several European Middle Paleolithic bifacial and unifacial tool assemblages is presented. The results show that resharpening and maintenance can be independent of morphology and technology, suggesting that there are strong grounds for focusing on functional systematics separately.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1447-1457
    Number of pages11
    JournalJournal of Archaeological Science
    Volume36
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 2009

    Fingerprint

    scaling
    statistical test
    quantitative method
    biology
    regression
    Scaling
    Resharpening
    Lithics
    Assemblages
    Trajectory
    Stone Tools

    Keywords

    • Classification
    • Elliptical Fourier analysis
    • Lithics
    • Ontogenetic scaling
    • Resharpening
    • Trajectories

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • History
    • Archaeology

    Cite this

    Ontogenetic scaling and lithic systematics : method and application. / Iovita, Radu.

    In: Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 36, No. 7, 07.2009, p. 1447-1457.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{839f481922404b689355f0a0b5507b2e,
    title = "Ontogenetic scaling and lithic systematics: method and application",
    abstract = "Stone tools tend to be classified according to a mix of functional, morphological, and technological attributes. This practice results in confusions when large-scale assemblage comparisons are made with the aim of investigating phylogenetic relationships, as functional and cultural information is aggregated. It is argued here that functional criteria must be assessed separately, and that resharpening, as a uniform, repeated, conscious behavioral process of tool maintenance that indexes use and function, can provide a solution to this problem. The subject of this article is a quantitative method for extracting and comparing resharpening trajectories. The method is an adaptation of ontogenetic scaling methods from biology, and is based on obtaining a mathematical representation of shape and size, and finding a relationship between the two. Elliptical Fourier analysis is applied to stone tool contours in order to extract shape information, and then a series of regressions of shape on size provide trajectory vectors. The angles between these are then calculated and subjected to a variety of multivariate statistical tests. A case study involving several European Middle Paleolithic bifacial and unifacial tool assemblages is presented. The results show that resharpening and maintenance can be independent of morphology and technology, suggesting that there are strong grounds for focusing on functional systematics separately.",
    keywords = "Classification, Elliptical Fourier analysis, Lithics, Ontogenetic scaling, Resharpening, Trajectories",
    author = "Radu Iovita",
    year = "2009",
    month = "7",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jas.2009.02.008",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "1447--1457",
    journal = "Journal of Archaeological Science",
    issn = "0305-4403",
    publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
    number = "7",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Ontogenetic scaling and lithic systematics

    T2 - method and application

    AU - Iovita, Radu

    PY - 2009/7

    Y1 - 2009/7

    N2 - Stone tools tend to be classified according to a mix of functional, morphological, and technological attributes. This practice results in confusions when large-scale assemblage comparisons are made with the aim of investigating phylogenetic relationships, as functional and cultural information is aggregated. It is argued here that functional criteria must be assessed separately, and that resharpening, as a uniform, repeated, conscious behavioral process of tool maintenance that indexes use and function, can provide a solution to this problem. The subject of this article is a quantitative method for extracting and comparing resharpening trajectories. The method is an adaptation of ontogenetic scaling methods from biology, and is based on obtaining a mathematical representation of shape and size, and finding a relationship between the two. Elliptical Fourier analysis is applied to stone tool contours in order to extract shape information, and then a series of regressions of shape on size provide trajectory vectors. The angles between these are then calculated and subjected to a variety of multivariate statistical tests. A case study involving several European Middle Paleolithic bifacial and unifacial tool assemblages is presented. The results show that resharpening and maintenance can be independent of morphology and technology, suggesting that there are strong grounds for focusing on functional systematics separately.

    AB - Stone tools tend to be classified according to a mix of functional, morphological, and technological attributes. This practice results in confusions when large-scale assemblage comparisons are made with the aim of investigating phylogenetic relationships, as functional and cultural information is aggregated. It is argued here that functional criteria must be assessed separately, and that resharpening, as a uniform, repeated, conscious behavioral process of tool maintenance that indexes use and function, can provide a solution to this problem. The subject of this article is a quantitative method for extracting and comparing resharpening trajectories. The method is an adaptation of ontogenetic scaling methods from biology, and is based on obtaining a mathematical representation of shape and size, and finding a relationship between the two. Elliptical Fourier analysis is applied to stone tool contours in order to extract shape information, and then a series of regressions of shape on size provide trajectory vectors. The angles between these are then calculated and subjected to a variety of multivariate statistical tests. A case study involving several European Middle Paleolithic bifacial and unifacial tool assemblages is presented. The results show that resharpening and maintenance can be independent of morphology and technology, suggesting that there are strong grounds for focusing on functional systematics separately.

    KW - Classification

    KW - Elliptical Fourier analysis

    KW - Lithics

    KW - Ontogenetic scaling

    KW - Resharpening

    KW - Trajectories

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349226101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349226101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jas.2009.02.008

    DO - 10.1016/j.jas.2009.02.008

    M3 - Article

    VL - 36

    SP - 1447

    EP - 1457

    JO - Journal of Archaeological Science

    JF - Journal of Archaeological Science

    SN - 0305-4403

    IS - 7

    ER -