One size doesn’t fit all: the influence of supervisors’ power tactics and subordinates’ need for cognitive closure on burnout and stress

Jocelyn Belanger, Antonio Pierro, Barbara Barbieri, Nicola A. De Carlo, Alessandra Falco, Arie W. Kruglanski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The present research investigated the notion of fit between supervisors’ power tactics and subordinates’ need for cognitive closure (NFCC) on subordinates’ burnout and stress. Subordinates who tend to avoid ambiguity (high NFCC) were expected to experience relatively less burnout (Study 1) and stress (Study 2) if their supervisors utilize harsh (controlling and unequivocal) power tactics and more burnout and stress if their supervisors utilize soft (autonomy-supportive and equivocal) power tactics. In contrast, it was expected that subordinates who avoid firm and binding conclusions (low NFCC) would experience relatively less burnout and stress if their supervisors use soft power tactics and more burnout and stress if they use harsh power tactics. Two studies conducted in diverse organizational settings supported these hypotheses. Collectively, these results support the conclusion that soft (vs. harsh) power tactics are not always associated with better (vs. worse) organizational outcomes. Theoretical and practical implications for organizations are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)287-300
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 3 2016

Fingerprint

Research
Burnout
Supervisors
Closure
Tactics

Keywords

  • burnout
  • need for cognitive closure
  • power
  • stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

One size doesn’t fit all : the influence of supervisors’ power tactics and subordinates’ need for cognitive closure on burnout and stress. / Belanger, Jocelyn; Pierro, Antonio; Barbieri, Barbara; De Carlo, Nicola A.; Falco, Alessandra; Kruglanski, Arie W.

In: European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 2, 03.03.2016, p. 287-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Belanger, Jocelyn ; Pierro, Antonio ; Barbieri, Barbara ; De Carlo, Nicola A. ; Falco, Alessandra ; Kruglanski, Arie W. / One size doesn’t fit all : the influence of supervisors’ power tactics and subordinates’ need for cognitive closure on burnout and stress. In: European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 287-300.
@article{eb3509cd0dce42bf97573b587e0cfc7f,
title = "One size doesn’t fit all: the influence of supervisors’ power tactics and subordinates’ need for cognitive closure on burnout and stress",
abstract = "The present research investigated the notion of fit between supervisors’ power tactics and subordinates’ need for cognitive closure (NFCC) on subordinates’ burnout and stress. Subordinates who tend to avoid ambiguity (high NFCC) were expected to experience relatively less burnout (Study 1) and stress (Study 2) if their supervisors utilize harsh (controlling and unequivocal) power tactics and more burnout and stress if their supervisors utilize soft (autonomy-supportive and equivocal) power tactics. In contrast, it was expected that subordinates who avoid firm and binding conclusions (low NFCC) would experience relatively less burnout and stress if their supervisors use soft power tactics and more burnout and stress if they use harsh power tactics. Two studies conducted in diverse organizational settings supported these hypotheses. Collectively, these results support the conclusion that soft (vs. harsh) power tactics are not always associated with better (vs. worse) organizational outcomes. Theoretical and practical implications for organizations are discussed.",
keywords = "burnout, need for cognitive closure, power, stress",
author = "Jocelyn Belanger and Antonio Pierro and Barbara Barbieri and {De Carlo}, {Nicola A.} and Alessandra Falco and Kruglanski, {Arie W.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/1359432X.2015.1061999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "287--300",
journal = "European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology",
issn = "1359-432X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - One size doesn’t fit all

T2 - the influence of supervisors’ power tactics and subordinates’ need for cognitive closure on burnout and stress

AU - Belanger, Jocelyn

AU - Pierro, Antonio

AU - Barbieri, Barbara

AU - De Carlo, Nicola A.

AU - Falco, Alessandra

AU - Kruglanski, Arie W.

PY - 2016/3/3

Y1 - 2016/3/3

N2 - The present research investigated the notion of fit between supervisors’ power tactics and subordinates’ need for cognitive closure (NFCC) on subordinates’ burnout and stress. Subordinates who tend to avoid ambiguity (high NFCC) were expected to experience relatively less burnout (Study 1) and stress (Study 2) if their supervisors utilize harsh (controlling and unequivocal) power tactics and more burnout and stress if their supervisors utilize soft (autonomy-supportive and equivocal) power tactics. In contrast, it was expected that subordinates who avoid firm and binding conclusions (low NFCC) would experience relatively less burnout and stress if their supervisors use soft power tactics and more burnout and stress if they use harsh power tactics. Two studies conducted in diverse organizational settings supported these hypotheses. Collectively, these results support the conclusion that soft (vs. harsh) power tactics are not always associated with better (vs. worse) organizational outcomes. Theoretical and practical implications for organizations are discussed.

AB - The present research investigated the notion of fit between supervisors’ power tactics and subordinates’ need for cognitive closure (NFCC) on subordinates’ burnout and stress. Subordinates who tend to avoid ambiguity (high NFCC) were expected to experience relatively less burnout (Study 1) and stress (Study 2) if their supervisors utilize harsh (controlling and unequivocal) power tactics and more burnout and stress if their supervisors utilize soft (autonomy-supportive and equivocal) power tactics. In contrast, it was expected that subordinates who avoid firm and binding conclusions (low NFCC) would experience relatively less burnout and stress if their supervisors use soft power tactics and more burnout and stress if they use harsh power tactics. Two studies conducted in diverse organizational settings supported these hypotheses. Collectively, these results support the conclusion that soft (vs. harsh) power tactics are not always associated with better (vs. worse) organizational outcomes. Theoretical and practical implications for organizations are discussed.

KW - burnout

KW - need for cognitive closure

KW - power

KW - stress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955656564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955656564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1359432X.2015.1061999

DO - 10.1080/1359432X.2015.1061999

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84955656564

VL - 25

SP - 287

EP - 300

JO - European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

JF - European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

SN - 1359-432X

IS - 2

ER -