On the relation between spontaneous trait inferences and intentional inferences: An inference monitoring hypothesis

Mário B. Ferreira, Leonel Garcia-Marques, David Hamilton, Tania Ramos, James S. Uleman, Rita Jeronimo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

More than twenty five years after the beginning of research on spontaneous trait inferences (Winter & Uleman, 1984) an intriguing paradox in the impression formation literature remains: if traits are spontaneously inferred, why aren't they used to organize behavioral information and thereby facilitate recall under memory instructions (Hamilton, Katz, & Leirer, 1980)? We hypothesized that organization by traits is more evident under impression formation goals because only in that case then are inferences sufficiently monitored to permit their use in organizing impressions. As a consequence, such monitored traits can then be used strategically as retrieval cues. Merging the main features of the Winter and Uleman and the Hamilton et al. experimental paradigms, Experiment 1 simultaneously replicated the main results of both studies. Using a new recognition paradigm, Experiments 2 and 3 further tested this inference monitoring hypothesis by showing that monitoring of trait inferences only occurs under particular processing goals, and is dependent on the availability of cognitive resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

attitude formation
monitoring
paradigm
experiment
Cues
instruction
organization
Research
resources
literature
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Automatic
  • Cognitive load
  • Impression formation inference monitoring
  • Intentional
  • PDP
  • Spontaneous trait inference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

On the relation between spontaneous trait inferences and intentional inferences : An inference monitoring hypothesis. / Ferreira, Mário B.; Garcia-Marques, Leonel; Hamilton, David; Ramos, Tania; Uleman, James S.; Jeronimo, Rita.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 48, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ferreira, Mário B. ; Garcia-Marques, Leonel ; Hamilton, David ; Ramos, Tania ; Uleman, James S. ; Jeronimo, Rita. / On the relation between spontaneous trait inferences and intentional inferences : An inference monitoring hypothesis. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2012 ; Vol. 48, No. 1. pp. 1-12.
@article{2eef59c8c50b4abaab732825acc3b86f,
title = "On the relation between spontaneous trait inferences and intentional inferences: An inference monitoring hypothesis",
abstract = "More than twenty five years after the beginning of research on spontaneous trait inferences (Winter & Uleman, 1984) an intriguing paradox in the impression formation literature remains: if traits are spontaneously inferred, why aren't they used to organize behavioral information and thereby facilitate recall under memory instructions (Hamilton, Katz, & Leirer, 1980)? We hypothesized that organization by traits is more evident under impression formation goals because only in that case then are inferences sufficiently monitored to permit their use in organizing impressions. As a consequence, such monitored traits can then be used strategically as retrieval cues. Merging the main features of the Winter and Uleman and the Hamilton et al. experimental paradigms, Experiment 1 simultaneously replicated the main results of both studies. Using a new recognition paradigm, Experiments 2 and 3 further tested this inference monitoring hypothesis by showing that monitoring of trait inferences only occurs under particular processing goals, and is dependent on the availability of cognitive resources.",
keywords = "Automatic, Cognitive load, Impression formation inference monitoring, Intentional, PDP, Spontaneous trait inference",
author = "Ferreira, {M{\'a}rio B.} and Leonel Garcia-Marques and David Hamilton and Tania Ramos and Uleman, {James S.} and Rita Jeronimo",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the relation between spontaneous trait inferences and intentional inferences

T2 - An inference monitoring hypothesis

AU - Ferreira, Mário B.

AU - Garcia-Marques, Leonel

AU - Hamilton, David

AU - Ramos, Tania

AU - Uleman, James S.

AU - Jeronimo, Rita

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - More than twenty five years after the beginning of research on spontaneous trait inferences (Winter & Uleman, 1984) an intriguing paradox in the impression formation literature remains: if traits are spontaneously inferred, why aren't they used to organize behavioral information and thereby facilitate recall under memory instructions (Hamilton, Katz, & Leirer, 1980)? We hypothesized that organization by traits is more evident under impression formation goals because only in that case then are inferences sufficiently monitored to permit their use in organizing impressions. As a consequence, such monitored traits can then be used strategically as retrieval cues. Merging the main features of the Winter and Uleman and the Hamilton et al. experimental paradigms, Experiment 1 simultaneously replicated the main results of both studies. Using a new recognition paradigm, Experiments 2 and 3 further tested this inference monitoring hypothesis by showing that monitoring of trait inferences only occurs under particular processing goals, and is dependent on the availability of cognitive resources.

AB - More than twenty five years after the beginning of research on spontaneous trait inferences (Winter & Uleman, 1984) an intriguing paradox in the impression formation literature remains: if traits are spontaneously inferred, why aren't they used to organize behavioral information and thereby facilitate recall under memory instructions (Hamilton, Katz, & Leirer, 1980)? We hypothesized that organization by traits is more evident under impression formation goals because only in that case then are inferences sufficiently monitored to permit their use in organizing impressions. As a consequence, such monitored traits can then be used strategically as retrieval cues. Merging the main features of the Winter and Uleman and the Hamilton et al. experimental paradigms, Experiment 1 simultaneously replicated the main results of both studies. Using a new recognition paradigm, Experiments 2 and 3 further tested this inference monitoring hypothesis by showing that monitoring of trait inferences only occurs under particular processing goals, and is dependent on the availability of cognitive resources.

KW - Automatic

KW - Cognitive load

KW - Impression formation inference monitoring

KW - Intentional

KW - PDP

KW - Spontaneous trait inference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82655162198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82655162198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.013

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:82655162198

VL - 48

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

IS - 1

ER -