On the Malleability of Ideology: Motivated Construals of Color Blindness

Eric D. Knowles, Brian S. Lowery, Caitlin M. Hogan, Rosalind M. Chow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The authors propose that the content of certain sociopolitical ideologies can be shaped by individuals in ways that satisfy their social motivations. This notion was tested in the context of color-blind ideology. Color blindness, when construed as a principle of distributive justice, is an egalitarian stance concerned with reducing discrepancies between groups' outcomes; as a principle of procedural justice, however, color blindness can function as a legitimizing ideology that entrenches existing inequalities. In Study 1, White people high in antiegalitarian sentiment were found to shift their construal of color blindness from a distributive to a procedural principle when exposed to intergroup threat. In Studies 2, 3A, and 3B, the authors used manipulations and a measure of threat to show that antiegalitarian White people endorse color blindness to legitimize the racial status quo. In Study 3B, participants' endorsement of color-blind ideology was mediated by increases in their preference for equal treatment (i.e., procedural justice) as a response to threat. In the Discussion section, the authors examine implications of the present perspective for understanding the manner in which individuals' compete over the meaning of crucial ideologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)857-869
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume96
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

Color Vision Defects
blindness
Social Justice
ideology
threat
Ideologies
Color
justice
equal treatment
distributive justice
manipulation
present
Group

Keywords

  • color blindness
  • distributive justice
  • ideology
  • legitimization
  • procedural justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

On the Malleability of Ideology : Motivated Construals of Color Blindness. / Knowles, Eric D.; Lowery, Brian S.; Hogan, Caitlin M.; Chow, Rosalind M.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 96, No. 4, 04.2009, p. 857-869.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Knowles, Eric D. ; Lowery, Brian S. ; Hogan, Caitlin M. ; Chow, Rosalind M. / On the Malleability of Ideology : Motivated Construals of Color Blindness. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009 ; Vol. 96, No. 4. pp. 857-869.
@article{0209c868a6384787be8075b9ab741858,
title = "On the Malleability of Ideology: Motivated Construals of Color Blindness",
abstract = "The authors propose that the content of certain sociopolitical ideologies can be shaped by individuals in ways that satisfy their social motivations. This notion was tested in the context of color-blind ideology. Color blindness, when construed as a principle of distributive justice, is an egalitarian stance concerned with reducing discrepancies between groups' outcomes; as a principle of procedural justice, however, color blindness can function as a legitimizing ideology that entrenches existing inequalities. In Study 1, White people high in antiegalitarian sentiment were found to shift their construal of color blindness from a distributive to a procedural principle when exposed to intergroup threat. In Studies 2, 3A, and 3B, the authors used manipulations and a measure of threat to show that antiegalitarian White people endorse color blindness to legitimize the racial status quo. In Study 3B, participants' endorsement of color-blind ideology was mediated by increases in their preference for equal treatment (i.e., procedural justice) as a response to threat. In the Discussion section, the authors examine implications of the present perspective for understanding the manner in which individuals' compete over the meaning of crucial ideologies.",
keywords = "color blindness, distributive justice, ideology, legitimization, procedural justice",
author = "Knowles, {Eric D.} and Lowery, {Brian S.} and Hogan, {Caitlin M.} and Chow, {Rosalind M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1037/a0013595",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "857--869",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Malleability of Ideology

T2 - Motivated Construals of Color Blindness

AU - Knowles, Eric D.

AU - Lowery, Brian S.

AU - Hogan, Caitlin M.

AU - Chow, Rosalind M.

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - The authors propose that the content of certain sociopolitical ideologies can be shaped by individuals in ways that satisfy their social motivations. This notion was tested in the context of color-blind ideology. Color blindness, when construed as a principle of distributive justice, is an egalitarian stance concerned with reducing discrepancies between groups' outcomes; as a principle of procedural justice, however, color blindness can function as a legitimizing ideology that entrenches existing inequalities. In Study 1, White people high in antiegalitarian sentiment were found to shift their construal of color blindness from a distributive to a procedural principle when exposed to intergroup threat. In Studies 2, 3A, and 3B, the authors used manipulations and a measure of threat to show that antiegalitarian White people endorse color blindness to legitimize the racial status quo. In Study 3B, participants' endorsement of color-blind ideology was mediated by increases in their preference for equal treatment (i.e., procedural justice) as a response to threat. In the Discussion section, the authors examine implications of the present perspective for understanding the manner in which individuals' compete over the meaning of crucial ideologies.

AB - The authors propose that the content of certain sociopolitical ideologies can be shaped by individuals in ways that satisfy their social motivations. This notion was tested in the context of color-blind ideology. Color blindness, when construed as a principle of distributive justice, is an egalitarian stance concerned with reducing discrepancies between groups' outcomes; as a principle of procedural justice, however, color blindness can function as a legitimizing ideology that entrenches existing inequalities. In Study 1, White people high in antiegalitarian sentiment were found to shift their construal of color blindness from a distributive to a procedural principle when exposed to intergroup threat. In Studies 2, 3A, and 3B, the authors used manipulations and a measure of threat to show that antiegalitarian White people endorse color blindness to legitimize the racial status quo. In Study 3B, participants' endorsement of color-blind ideology was mediated by increases in their preference for equal treatment (i.e., procedural justice) as a response to threat. In the Discussion section, the authors examine implications of the present perspective for understanding the manner in which individuals' compete over the meaning of crucial ideologies.

KW - color blindness

KW - distributive justice

KW - ideology

KW - legitimization

KW - procedural justice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65349146994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65349146994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0013595

DO - 10.1037/a0013595

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 857

EP - 869

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 4

ER -