On the decline of class analysis in South Asian studies

Vivek Chibber

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The decline of class analysis has been pervasive across the intellectual landscape in recent years. But South Asian studies stands out in the severity with which it has been hit by this phenomenon. It also is the field where the influence of post-structuralism has been most pronounced in the wake of Marxism's decline. This essay offers an explanation for both the decline of class analysis and the ascendance of post-structuralism in South Asian studies as practiced in the United States. I suggest that the decline of class theorizing was a predictable and natural result of the decline of working-class politics in the United States. But the severity of its decline in South Asian studies in particular was a symptom of its never having made much of a dent on the field in the first place. This left unchallenged the traditional, Indological approach, which was heavily oriented toward culturalism. This in turn made the field a hospitable ground for the entrance of post-structuralism, which, like mainstream Indology, not only eschews materialist analysis, but is largely hostile to class. South Asian studies is thus one of the few fields in which traditional scholars and younger ones are both able to agree on their hostility to class analysis. Finally, I argue that the decline of class is now visible in Indian universities too, and this is largely caused by the overwhelming influence that U.S. universities have come to exercise over Indian elite academic culture.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)357-387
    Number of pages31
    JournalCritical Asian Studies
    Volume38
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 2006

    Fingerprint

    post-structuralism
    Marxism
    university
    working class
    politics
    elite
    analysis

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Geography, Planning and Development
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    On the decline of class analysis in South Asian studies. / Chibber, Vivek.

    In: Critical Asian Studies, Vol. 38, No. 4, 12.2006, p. 357-387.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Chibber, Vivek. / On the decline of class analysis in South Asian studies. In: Critical Asian Studies. 2006 ; Vol. 38, No. 4. pp. 357-387.
    @article{379f99bbdb8541eabf92bffded4edb5b,
    title = "On the decline of class analysis in South Asian studies",
    abstract = "The decline of class analysis has been pervasive across the intellectual landscape in recent years. But South Asian studies stands out in the severity with which it has been hit by this phenomenon. It also is the field where the influence of post-structuralism has been most pronounced in the wake of Marxism's decline. This essay offers an explanation for both the decline of class analysis and the ascendance of post-structuralism in South Asian studies as practiced in the United States. I suggest that the decline of class theorizing was a predictable and natural result of the decline of working-class politics in the United States. But the severity of its decline in South Asian studies in particular was a symptom of its never having made much of a dent on the field in the first place. This left unchallenged the traditional, Indological approach, which was heavily oriented toward culturalism. This in turn made the field a hospitable ground for the entrance of post-structuralism, which, like mainstream Indology, not only eschews materialist analysis, but is largely hostile to class. South Asian studies is thus one of the few fields in which traditional scholars and younger ones are both able to agree on their hostility to class analysis. Finally, I argue that the decline of class is now visible in Indian universities too, and this is largely caused by the overwhelming influence that U.S. universities have come to exercise over Indian elite academic culture.",
    author = "Vivek Chibber",
    year = "2006",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1080/14672710601072970",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "38",
    pages = "357--387",
    journal = "Critical Asian Studies",
    issn = "1467-2715",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - On the decline of class analysis in South Asian studies

    AU - Chibber, Vivek

    PY - 2006/12

    Y1 - 2006/12

    N2 - The decline of class analysis has been pervasive across the intellectual landscape in recent years. But South Asian studies stands out in the severity with which it has been hit by this phenomenon. It also is the field where the influence of post-structuralism has been most pronounced in the wake of Marxism's decline. This essay offers an explanation for both the decline of class analysis and the ascendance of post-structuralism in South Asian studies as practiced in the United States. I suggest that the decline of class theorizing was a predictable and natural result of the decline of working-class politics in the United States. But the severity of its decline in South Asian studies in particular was a symptom of its never having made much of a dent on the field in the first place. This left unchallenged the traditional, Indological approach, which was heavily oriented toward culturalism. This in turn made the field a hospitable ground for the entrance of post-structuralism, which, like mainstream Indology, not only eschews materialist analysis, but is largely hostile to class. South Asian studies is thus one of the few fields in which traditional scholars and younger ones are both able to agree on their hostility to class analysis. Finally, I argue that the decline of class is now visible in Indian universities too, and this is largely caused by the overwhelming influence that U.S. universities have come to exercise over Indian elite academic culture.

    AB - The decline of class analysis has been pervasive across the intellectual landscape in recent years. But South Asian studies stands out in the severity with which it has been hit by this phenomenon. It also is the field where the influence of post-structuralism has been most pronounced in the wake of Marxism's decline. This essay offers an explanation for both the decline of class analysis and the ascendance of post-structuralism in South Asian studies as practiced in the United States. I suggest that the decline of class theorizing was a predictable and natural result of the decline of working-class politics in the United States. But the severity of its decline in South Asian studies in particular was a symptom of its never having made much of a dent on the field in the first place. This left unchallenged the traditional, Indological approach, which was heavily oriented toward culturalism. This in turn made the field a hospitable ground for the entrance of post-structuralism, which, like mainstream Indology, not only eschews materialist analysis, but is largely hostile to class. South Asian studies is thus one of the few fields in which traditional scholars and younger ones are both able to agree on their hostility to class analysis. Finally, I argue that the decline of class is now visible in Indian universities too, and this is largely caused by the overwhelming influence that U.S. universities have come to exercise over Indian elite academic culture.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34347255720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34347255720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/14672710601072970

    DO - 10.1080/14672710601072970

    M3 - Article

    VL - 38

    SP - 357

    EP - 387

    JO - Critical Asian Studies

    JF - Critical Asian Studies

    SN - 1467-2715

    IS - 4

    ER -