On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention

A speed-accuracy trade-off analysis

Anna Marie Giordano, Brian McElree, Marisa Carrasco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Exogenous covert attention improves discriminability and accelerates the rate of visual information processing (M. Carrasco & B. McElree, 2001). Here we investigated and compared the effects of both endogenous (sustained) and exogenous (transient) covert attention. Specifically, we directed attention via spatial cues and evaluated the automaticity and flexibility of exogenous and endogenous attention by manipulating cue validity in conjunction with a response-signal speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) procedure, which provides conjoint measures of discriminability and information accrual. To investigate whether discriminability and rate of information processing differ as a function of cue validity (chance to 100%), we compared how both types of attention affect performance while keeping experimental conditions constant. With endogenous attention, both the observed benefits (valid-cue) and the costs (invalid-cue) increased with cue validity. However, with exogenous attention, the benefits and costs in both discriminability and processing speed were similar across cue validity conditions. These results provide compelling time-course evidence that whereas endogenous attention can be flexibly allocated according to cue validity, exogenous attention is automatic and unaffected by cue validity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number30
JournalJournal of vision
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 31 2009

Fingerprint

Cues
Automatic Data Processing
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Automaticity
  • Covert attention
  • Endogenous
  • Exogenous
  • Flexibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention : A speed-accuracy trade-off analysis. / Giordano, Anna Marie; McElree, Brian; Carrasco, Marisa.

In: Journal of vision, Vol. 9, No. 3, 30, 31.03.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Giordano, Anna Marie ; McElree, Brian ; Carrasco, Marisa. / On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention : A speed-accuracy trade-off analysis. In: Journal of vision. 2009 ; Vol. 9, No. 3.
@article{9f84ecf86ed9439a80d6f2962633f1c1,
title = "On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention: A speed-accuracy trade-off analysis",
abstract = "Exogenous covert attention improves discriminability and accelerates the rate of visual information processing (M. Carrasco & B. McElree, 2001). Here we investigated and compared the effects of both endogenous (sustained) and exogenous (transient) covert attention. Specifically, we directed attention via spatial cues and evaluated the automaticity and flexibility of exogenous and endogenous attention by manipulating cue validity in conjunction with a response-signal speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) procedure, which provides conjoint measures of discriminability and information accrual. To investigate whether discriminability and rate of information processing differ as a function of cue validity (chance to 100{\%}), we compared how both types of attention affect performance while keeping experimental conditions constant. With endogenous attention, both the observed benefits (valid-cue) and the costs (invalid-cue) increased with cue validity. However, with exogenous attention, the benefits and costs in both discriminability and processing speed were similar across cue validity conditions. These results provide compelling time-course evidence that whereas endogenous attention can be flexibly allocated according to cue validity, exogenous attention is automatic and unaffected by cue validity.",
keywords = "Automaticity, Covert attention, Endogenous, Exogenous, Flexibility",
author = "Giordano, {Anna Marie} and Brian McElree and Marisa Carrasco",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1167/9.3.30",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Journal of vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention

T2 - A speed-accuracy trade-off analysis

AU - Giordano, Anna Marie

AU - McElree, Brian

AU - Carrasco, Marisa

PY - 2009/3/31

Y1 - 2009/3/31

N2 - Exogenous covert attention improves discriminability and accelerates the rate of visual information processing (M. Carrasco & B. McElree, 2001). Here we investigated and compared the effects of both endogenous (sustained) and exogenous (transient) covert attention. Specifically, we directed attention via spatial cues and evaluated the automaticity and flexibility of exogenous and endogenous attention by manipulating cue validity in conjunction with a response-signal speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) procedure, which provides conjoint measures of discriminability and information accrual. To investigate whether discriminability and rate of information processing differ as a function of cue validity (chance to 100%), we compared how both types of attention affect performance while keeping experimental conditions constant. With endogenous attention, both the observed benefits (valid-cue) and the costs (invalid-cue) increased with cue validity. However, with exogenous attention, the benefits and costs in both discriminability and processing speed were similar across cue validity conditions. These results provide compelling time-course evidence that whereas endogenous attention can be flexibly allocated according to cue validity, exogenous attention is automatic and unaffected by cue validity.

AB - Exogenous covert attention improves discriminability and accelerates the rate of visual information processing (M. Carrasco & B. McElree, 2001). Here we investigated and compared the effects of both endogenous (sustained) and exogenous (transient) covert attention. Specifically, we directed attention via spatial cues and evaluated the automaticity and flexibility of exogenous and endogenous attention by manipulating cue validity in conjunction with a response-signal speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) procedure, which provides conjoint measures of discriminability and information accrual. To investigate whether discriminability and rate of information processing differ as a function of cue validity (chance to 100%), we compared how both types of attention affect performance while keeping experimental conditions constant. With endogenous attention, both the observed benefits (valid-cue) and the costs (invalid-cue) increased with cue validity. However, with exogenous attention, the benefits and costs in both discriminability and processing speed were similar across cue validity conditions. These results provide compelling time-course evidence that whereas endogenous attention can be flexibly allocated according to cue validity, exogenous attention is automatic and unaffected by cue validity.

KW - Automaticity

KW - Covert attention

KW - Endogenous

KW - Exogenous

KW - Flexibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64549083649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64549083649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/9.3.30

DO - 10.1167/9.3.30

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Journal of vision

JF - Journal of vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 3

M1 - 30

ER -