On metaphoric representation

Gregory Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The article discusses claims that conceptual structure is in some part metaphorical, as identified by verbal metaphors like LOVE IS A JOURNEY. Two main interpretations of this view are discussed. In the first, a target domain is not explicitly represented but is instead understood through reference to a different domain. For example, rather than a detailed concept of love per se, one could make reference to the concept of a journey. In the second interpretation, there is a separate representation of love, but the content of that representation is influenced by the metaphor such that the love concept takes on the same structure as the journey concept. It is argued that the first interpretation is not fully coherent. The second interpretation is a possible theory of mental representation, but the article raises a number of empirical and theoretical problems for it. It is concluded that many of the data cited as evidence for metaphoric representations can be accounted for by structural similarity between domains.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-204
Number of pages32
JournalCognition
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2 1996

Fingerprint

Love
Metaphor
love
interpretation
metaphor
Metaphoric
evidence
Journey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

On metaphoric representation. / Murphy, Gregory.

In: Cognition, Vol. 60, No. 2, 02.08.1996, p. 173-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murphy, Gregory. / On metaphoric representation. In: Cognition. 1996 ; Vol. 60, No. 2. pp. 173-204.
@article{dbe79648dd394b448796bc5c0656fc92,
title = "On metaphoric representation",
abstract = "The article discusses claims that conceptual structure is in some part metaphorical, as identified by verbal metaphors like LOVE IS A JOURNEY. Two main interpretations of this view are discussed. In the first, a target domain is not explicitly represented but is instead understood through reference to a different domain. For example, rather than a detailed concept of love per se, one could make reference to the concept of a journey. In the second interpretation, there is a separate representation of love, but the content of that representation is influenced by the metaphor such that the love concept takes on the same structure as the journey concept. It is argued that the first interpretation is not fully coherent. The second interpretation is a possible theory of mental representation, but the article raises a number of empirical and theoretical problems for it. It is concluded that many of the data cited as evidence for metaphoric representations can be accounted for by structural similarity between domains.",
author = "Gregory Murphy",
year = "1996",
month = "8",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "173--204",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On metaphoric representation

AU - Murphy, Gregory

PY - 1996/8/2

Y1 - 1996/8/2

N2 - The article discusses claims that conceptual structure is in some part metaphorical, as identified by verbal metaphors like LOVE IS A JOURNEY. Two main interpretations of this view are discussed. In the first, a target domain is not explicitly represented but is instead understood through reference to a different domain. For example, rather than a detailed concept of love per se, one could make reference to the concept of a journey. In the second interpretation, there is a separate representation of love, but the content of that representation is influenced by the metaphor such that the love concept takes on the same structure as the journey concept. It is argued that the first interpretation is not fully coherent. The second interpretation is a possible theory of mental representation, but the article raises a number of empirical and theoretical problems for it. It is concluded that many of the data cited as evidence for metaphoric representations can be accounted for by structural similarity between domains.

AB - The article discusses claims that conceptual structure is in some part metaphorical, as identified by verbal metaphors like LOVE IS A JOURNEY. Two main interpretations of this view are discussed. In the first, a target domain is not explicitly represented but is instead understood through reference to a different domain. For example, rather than a detailed concept of love per se, one could make reference to the concept of a journey. In the second interpretation, there is a separate representation of love, but the content of that representation is influenced by the metaphor such that the love concept takes on the same structure as the journey concept. It is argued that the first interpretation is not fully coherent. The second interpretation is a possible theory of mental representation, but the article raises a number of empirical and theoretical problems for it. It is concluded that many of the data cited as evidence for metaphoric representations can be accounted for by structural similarity between domains.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030208933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030208933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1

DO - 10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 8811744

AN - SCOPUS:0030208933

VL - 60

SP - 173

EP - 204

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

IS - 2

ER -