Older adults' evaluation of a nutrition newsletter

Kristie Lancaster, H. Smiciklas-Wright, F. Ahern, C. Achterberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Newsletters (NL) are increasingly common vehicles for conveying health and nutrition information, but there is sparse information on their acceptance by readers. This study was conducted to assess older adults' opinions about an age-targeted NL and characteristics associated with their opinions A nationwide sample (n=210) of men and women ages > 55 y was recruited through random digit dialing. Following a telephone call to obtain demographic, health and nutrition-related data, subjects were sent the NL A follow-up call asked their opinion of the evaluation variables: appearance, content, and interest in receiving future issues. One hundred and seventytwo subjects received the NL and completed both interviews. Mean ratings for the 3 NL evaluation variables were 36.57±2.72 and 33.98±4.46 out of a possible 45 for appearance and future interest, and 48.72±7.12 out of 65 for the content variable. Little of the variation in opinions about either appearance or content was explained by study variables (R2=.125 and R2=071, respectively), but 23% of the variation in future interest was explained. More likely to be interested were: women, those interested in nutrition, those who read a lot and those less likely to believe their health is due to chance. The data suggest that response of older adults to a nutrition NL can be positive; future work must address its effectiveness as a medium for health education. Funded in part by the Howard Heinz Endowment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalFASEB Journal
Volume10
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Nutrition
Health
nutrition
health information
health education
nutrition information
Conveying
Telephone
interviews
demographic statistics
Education
Financial Management
Health Education
Demography
Interviews
sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Biochemistry
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Lancaster, K., Smiciklas-Wright, H., Ahern, F., & Achterberg, C. (1996). Older adults' evaluation of a nutrition newsletter. FASEB Journal, 10(3).

Older adults' evaluation of a nutrition newsletter. / Lancaster, Kristie; Smiciklas-Wright, H.; Ahern, F.; Achterberg, C.

In: FASEB Journal, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lancaster, K, Smiciklas-Wright, H, Ahern, F & Achterberg, C 1996, 'Older adults' evaluation of a nutrition newsletter', FASEB Journal, vol. 10, no. 3.
Lancaster K, Smiciklas-Wright H, Ahern F, Achterberg C. Older adults' evaluation of a nutrition newsletter. FASEB Journal. 1996;10(3).
Lancaster, Kristie ; Smiciklas-Wright, H. ; Ahern, F. ; Achterberg, C. / Older adults' evaluation of a nutrition newsletter. In: FASEB Journal. 1996 ; Vol. 10, No. 3.
@article{b79e03a3c43e4405aecf824d94a98c86,
title = "Older adults' evaluation of a nutrition newsletter",
abstract = "Newsletters (NL) are increasingly common vehicles for conveying health and nutrition information, but there is sparse information on their acceptance by readers. This study was conducted to assess older adults' opinions about an age-targeted NL and characteristics associated with their opinions A nationwide sample (n=210) of men and women ages > 55 y was recruited through random digit dialing. Following a telephone call to obtain demographic, health and nutrition-related data, subjects were sent the NL A follow-up call asked their opinion of the evaluation variables: appearance, content, and interest in receiving future issues. One hundred and seventytwo subjects received the NL and completed both interviews. Mean ratings for the 3 NL evaluation variables were 36.57±2.72 and 33.98±4.46 out of a possible 45 for appearance and future interest, and 48.72±7.12 out of 65 for the content variable. Little of the variation in opinions about either appearance or content was explained by study variables (R2=.125 and R2=071, respectively), but 23{\%} of the variation in future interest was explained. More likely to be interested were: women, those interested in nutrition, those who read a lot and those less likely to believe their health is due to chance. The data suggest that response of older adults to a nutrition NL can be positive; future work must address its effectiveness as a medium for health education. Funded in part by the Howard Heinz Endowment.",
author = "Kristie Lancaster and H. Smiciklas-Wright and F. Ahern and C. Achterberg",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "FASEB Journal",
issn = "0892-6638",
publisher = "FASEB",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Older adults' evaluation of a nutrition newsletter

AU - Lancaster, Kristie

AU - Smiciklas-Wright, H.

AU - Ahern, F.

AU - Achterberg, C.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Newsletters (NL) are increasingly common vehicles for conveying health and nutrition information, but there is sparse information on their acceptance by readers. This study was conducted to assess older adults' opinions about an age-targeted NL and characteristics associated with their opinions A nationwide sample (n=210) of men and women ages > 55 y was recruited through random digit dialing. Following a telephone call to obtain demographic, health and nutrition-related data, subjects were sent the NL A follow-up call asked their opinion of the evaluation variables: appearance, content, and interest in receiving future issues. One hundred and seventytwo subjects received the NL and completed both interviews. Mean ratings for the 3 NL evaluation variables were 36.57±2.72 and 33.98±4.46 out of a possible 45 for appearance and future interest, and 48.72±7.12 out of 65 for the content variable. Little of the variation in opinions about either appearance or content was explained by study variables (R2=.125 and R2=071, respectively), but 23% of the variation in future interest was explained. More likely to be interested were: women, those interested in nutrition, those who read a lot and those less likely to believe their health is due to chance. The data suggest that response of older adults to a nutrition NL can be positive; future work must address its effectiveness as a medium for health education. Funded in part by the Howard Heinz Endowment.

AB - Newsletters (NL) are increasingly common vehicles for conveying health and nutrition information, but there is sparse information on their acceptance by readers. This study was conducted to assess older adults' opinions about an age-targeted NL and characteristics associated with their opinions A nationwide sample (n=210) of men and women ages > 55 y was recruited through random digit dialing. Following a telephone call to obtain demographic, health and nutrition-related data, subjects were sent the NL A follow-up call asked their opinion of the evaluation variables: appearance, content, and interest in receiving future issues. One hundred and seventytwo subjects received the NL and completed both interviews. Mean ratings for the 3 NL evaluation variables were 36.57±2.72 and 33.98±4.46 out of a possible 45 for appearance and future interest, and 48.72±7.12 out of 65 for the content variable. Little of the variation in opinions about either appearance or content was explained by study variables (R2=.125 and R2=071, respectively), but 23% of the variation in future interest was explained. More likely to be interested were: women, those interested in nutrition, those who read a lot and those less likely to believe their health is due to chance. The data suggest that response of older adults to a nutrition NL can be positive; future work must address its effectiveness as a medium for health education. Funded in part by the Howard Heinz Endowment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749112641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749112641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - FASEB Journal

JF - FASEB Journal

SN - 0892-6638

IS - 3

ER -