Office prenatal formula advertising and its effect on breast-feeding patterns

Cynthia Howard, Fred Howard, Ruth Lawrence, Elena Andresen, Elisabeth DeBlieck, Michael Weitzman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Objective: To compare the effect of formula company-produced materials about infant feeding to breast-feeding promotion materials without formula advertising on breast-feeding initiation and duration. Methods: Five hundred forty-seven pregnant women were randomized to receive either formula company (commercial; n = 277) or specially designed (research; n = 270) educational packs about infant feeding at their first prenatal visit. Feeding method was determined at delivery. Breast-feeding duration of the 294 women who chose to breast-feed was ascertained at 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Survival analyses were used to evaluate continuous outcomes, and χ2 and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate discrete outcomes. Results: Breast-feeding initiation (relative risk [RR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61, 1.43) and duration after 2 weeks (hazard ratio 1.19, 95% CI 0.86, 1.64) were not affected. Women in the commercial group were more likely to cease breast-feeding before hospital discharge (RR 5.80, 95% CI 1.25, 54.01) and before 2 weeks (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% CI 1.02, 3.55). In subgroup analyses, women with uncertain goals for breast-feeding or goals of 12 weeks or less experienced shortened exclusive (hazard ratio 1.53, 95% CI 1.06, 2.21), full (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% CI 1.18, 2.48), and overall (hazard ratio 1.75, 95% CI 1.16, 2.64) breast-feeding duration when exposed to the commercial intervention. Conclusion: Although breast-feeding initiation and long-term duration were not affected, exposure to formula promotion materials increased significantly breast-feeding cessation in the first 2 weeks. Additionally, among women with uncertain goals or breast-feeding goals of 12 weeks or less, exclusive, full, and overall breast-feeding duration were shortened. Educational materials about infant feeding should support unequivocally breast-feeding as optimal nutrition for infants; formula promotion products should be eliminated from prenatal settings. Copyright (C) 2000 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)296-303
    Number of pages8
    JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
    Volume95
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Feb 1 2000

    Fingerprint

    Feeding Behavior
    Breast Feeding
    Confidence Intervals
    Feeding Methods
    Survival Analysis
    Pregnant Women
    Breast
    Logistic Models
    Odds Ratio
    Regression Analysis

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology

    Cite this

    Howard, C., Howard, F., Lawrence, R., Andresen, E., DeBlieck, E., & Weitzman, M. (2000). Office prenatal formula advertising and its effect on breast-feeding patterns. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 95(2), 296-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00555-4

    Office prenatal formula advertising and its effect on breast-feeding patterns. / Howard, Cynthia; Howard, Fred; Lawrence, Ruth; Andresen, Elena; DeBlieck, Elisabeth; Weitzman, Michael.

    In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 95, No. 2, 01.02.2000, p. 296-303.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Howard, C, Howard, F, Lawrence, R, Andresen, E, DeBlieck, E & Weitzman, M 2000, 'Office prenatal formula advertising and its effect on breast-feeding patterns', Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 296-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00555-4
    Howard C, Howard F, Lawrence R, Andresen E, DeBlieck E, Weitzman M. Office prenatal formula advertising and its effect on breast-feeding patterns. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000 Feb 1;95(2):296-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00555-4
    Howard, Cynthia ; Howard, Fred ; Lawrence, Ruth ; Andresen, Elena ; DeBlieck, Elisabeth ; Weitzman, Michael. / Office prenatal formula advertising and its effect on breast-feeding patterns. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000 ; Vol. 95, No. 2. pp. 296-303.
    @article{537b41bf2e2142eca405287d47964afc,
    title = "Office prenatal formula advertising and its effect on breast-feeding patterns",
    abstract = "Objective: To compare the effect of formula company-produced materials about infant feeding to breast-feeding promotion materials without formula advertising on breast-feeding initiation and duration. Methods: Five hundred forty-seven pregnant women were randomized to receive either formula company (commercial; n = 277) or specially designed (research; n = 270) educational packs about infant feeding at their first prenatal visit. Feeding method was determined at delivery. Breast-feeding duration of the 294 women who chose to breast-feed was ascertained at 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Survival analyses were used to evaluate continuous outcomes, and χ2 and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate discrete outcomes. Results: Breast-feeding initiation (relative risk [RR] 0.93, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 0.61, 1.43) and duration after 2 weeks (hazard ratio 1.19, 95{\%} CI 0.86, 1.64) were not affected. Women in the commercial group were more likely to cease breast-feeding before hospital discharge (RR 5.80, 95{\%} CI 1.25, 54.01) and before 2 weeks (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95{\%} CI 1.02, 3.55). In subgroup analyses, women with uncertain goals for breast-feeding or goals of 12 weeks or less experienced shortened exclusive (hazard ratio 1.53, 95{\%} CI 1.06, 2.21), full (hazard ratio 1.70, 95{\%} CI 1.18, 2.48), and overall (hazard ratio 1.75, 95{\%} CI 1.16, 2.64) breast-feeding duration when exposed to the commercial intervention. Conclusion: Although breast-feeding initiation and long-term duration were not affected, exposure to formula promotion materials increased significantly breast-feeding cessation in the first 2 weeks. Additionally, among women with uncertain goals or breast-feeding goals of 12 weeks or less, exclusive, full, and overall breast-feeding duration were shortened. Educational materials about infant feeding should support unequivocally breast-feeding as optimal nutrition for infants; formula promotion products should be eliminated from prenatal settings. Copyright (C) 2000 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.",
    author = "Cynthia Howard and Fred Howard and Ruth Lawrence and Elena Andresen and Elisabeth DeBlieck and Michael Weitzman",
    year = "2000",
    month = "2",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00555-4",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "95",
    pages = "296--303",
    journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
    issn = "0029-7844",
    publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Office prenatal formula advertising and its effect on breast-feeding patterns

    AU - Howard, Cynthia

    AU - Howard, Fred

    AU - Lawrence, Ruth

    AU - Andresen, Elena

    AU - DeBlieck, Elisabeth

    AU - Weitzman, Michael

    PY - 2000/2/1

    Y1 - 2000/2/1

    N2 - Objective: To compare the effect of formula company-produced materials about infant feeding to breast-feeding promotion materials without formula advertising on breast-feeding initiation and duration. Methods: Five hundred forty-seven pregnant women were randomized to receive either formula company (commercial; n = 277) or specially designed (research; n = 270) educational packs about infant feeding at their first prenatal visit. Feeding method was determined at delivery. Breast-feeding duration of the 294 women who chose to breast-feed was ascertained at 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Survival analyses were used to evaluate continuous outcomes, and χ2 and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate discrete outcomes. Results: Breast-feeding initiation (relative risk [RR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61, 1.43) and duration after 2 weeks (hazard ratio 1.19, 95% CI 0.86, 1.64) were not affected. Women in the commercial group were more likely to cease breast-feeding before hospital discharge (RR 5.80, 95% CI 1.25, 54.01) and before 2 weeks (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% CI 1.02, 3.55). In subgroup analyses, women with uncertain goals for breast-feeding or goals of 12 weeks or less experienced shortened exclusive (hazard ratio 1.53, 95% CI 1.06, 2.21), full (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% CI 1.18, 2.48), and overall (hazard ratio 1.75, 95% CI 1.16, 2.64) breast-feeding duration when exposed to the commercial intervention. Conclusion: Although breast-feeding initiation and long-term duration were not affected, exposure to formula promotion materials increased significantly breast-feeding cessation in the first 2 weeks. Additionally, among women with uncertain goals or breast-feeding goals of 12 weeks or less, exclusive, full, and overall breast-feeding duration were shortened. Educational materials about infant feeding should support unequivocally breast-feeding as optimal nutrition for infants; formula promotion products should be eliminated from prenatal settings. Copyright (C) 2000 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

    AB - Objective: To compare the effect of formula company-produced materials about infant feeding to breast-feeding promotion materials without formula advertising on breast-feeding initiation and duration. Methods: Five hundred forty-seven pregnant women were randomized to receive either formula company (commercial; n = 277) or specially designed (research; n = 270) educational packs about infant feeding at their first prenatal visit. Feeding method was determined at delivery. Breast-feeding duration of the 294 women who chose to breast-feed was ascertained at 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Survival analyses were used to evaluate continuous outcomes, and χ2 and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate discrete outcomes. Results: Breast-feeding initiation (relative risk [RR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61, 1.43) and duration after 2 weeks (hazard ratio 1.19, 95% CI 0.86, 1.64) were not affected. Women in the commercial group were more likely to cease breast-feeding before hospital discharge (RR 5.80, 95% CI 1.25, 54.01) and before 2 weeks (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% CI 1.02, 3.55). In subgroup analyses, women with uncertain goals for breast-feeding or goals of 12 weeks or less experienced shortened exclusive (hazard ratio 1.53, 95% CI 1.06, 2.21), full (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% CI 1.18, 2.48), and overall (hazard ratio 1.75, 95% CI 1.16, 2.64) breast-feeding duration when exposed to the commercial intervention. Conclusion: Although breast-feeding initiation and long-term duration were not affected, exposure to formula promotion materials increased significantly breast-feeding cessation in the first 2 weeks. Additionally, among women with uncertain goals or breast-feeding goals of 12 weeks or less, exclusive, full, and overall breast-feeding duration were shortened. Educational materials about infant feeding should support unequivocally breast-feeding as optimal nutrition for infants; formula promotion products should be eliminated from prenatal settings. Copyright (C) 2000 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033984041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033984041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00555-4

    DO - 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00555-4

    M3 - Article

    VL - 95

    SP - 296

    EP - 303

    JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

    JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

    SN - 0029-7844

    IS - 2

    ER -