Of Echo Chambers and Contrarian Clubs

Exposure to Political Disagreement Among German and Italian Users of Twitter

Cristian Vaccari, Augusto Valeriani, Pablo Barberá, John Jost, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua Tucker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Scholars have debated whether social media platforms, by allowing users to select the information to which they are exposed, may lead people to isolate themselves from viewpoints with which they disagree, thereby serving as political “echo chambers.” We investigate hypotheses concerning the circumstances under which Twitter users who communicate about elections would engage with (a) supportive, (b) oppositional, and (c) mixed political networks. Based on online surveys of representative samples of Italian and German individuals who posted at least one Twitter message about elections in 2013, we find substantial differences in the extent to which social media facilitates exposure to similar versus dissimilar political views. Our results suggest that exposure to supportive, oppositional, or mixed political networks on social media can be explained by broader patterns of political conversation (i.e., structure of offline networks) and specific habits in the political use of social media (i.e., the intensity of political discussion). These findings suggest that disagreement persists on social media even when ideological homophily is the modal outcome, and that scholars should pay more attention to specific situational and dispositional factors when evaluating the implications of social media for political communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSocial Media and Society
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

twitter
clubs
social media
chamber
Communication
election
political communication
online survey
habits
conversation

Keywords

  • political disagreement
  • political discussion
  • political homophily
  • political networks
  • social media

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Communication
  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

Of Echo Chambers and Contrarian Clubs : Exposure to Political Disagreement Among German and Italian Users of Twitter. / Vaccari, Cristian; Valeriani, Augusto; Barberá, Pablo; Jost, John; Nagler, Jonathan; Tucker, Joshua.

In: Social Media and Society, Vol. 2, No. 3, 01.08.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5d74f573f19a47aeaa8aa9bee646bcfb,
title = "Of Echo Chambers and Contrarian Clubs: Exposure to Political Disagreement Among German and Italian Users of Twitter",
abstract = "Scholars have debated whether social media platforms, by allowing users to select the information to which they are exposed, may lead people to isolate themselves from viewpoints with which they disagree, thereby serving as political “echo chambers.” We investigate hypotheses concerning the circumstances under which Twitter users who communicate about elections would engage with (a) supportive, (b) oppositional, and (c) mixed political networks. Based on online surveys of representative samples of Italian and German individuals who posted at least one Twitter message about elections in 2013, we find substantial differences in the extent to which social media facilitates exposure to similar versus dissimilar political views. Our results suggest that exposure to supportive, oppositional, or mixed political networks on social media can be explained by broader patterns of political conversation (i.e., structure of offline networks) and specific habits in the political use of social media (i.e., the intensity of political discussion). These findings suggest that disagreement persists on social media even when ideological homophily is the modal outcome, and that scholars should pay more attention to specific situational and dispositional factors when evaluating the implications of social media for political communication.",
keywords = "political disagreement, political discussion, political homophily, political networks, social media",
author = "Cristian Vaccari and Augusto Valeriani and Pablo Barber{\'a} and John Jost and Jonathan Nagler and Joshua Tucker",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2056305116664221",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
journal = "Social Media and Society",
issn = "2056-3051",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Of Echo Chambers and Contrarian Clubs

T2 - Exposure to Political Disagreement Among German and Italian Users of Twitter

AU - Vaccari, Cristian

AU - Valeriani, Augusto

AU - Barberá, Pablo

AU - Jost, John

AU - Nagler, Jonathan

AU - Tucker, Joshua

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Scholars have debated whether social media platforms, by allowing users to select the information to which they are exposed, may lead people to isolate themselves from viewpoints with which they disagree, thereby serving as political “echo chambers.” We investigate hypotheses concerning the circumstances under which Twitter users who communicate about elections would engage with (a) supportive, (b) oppositional, and (c) mixed political networks. Based on online surveys of representative samples of Italian and German individuals who posted at least one Twitter message about elections in 2013, we find substantial differences in the extent to which social media facilitates exposure to similar versus dissimilar political views. Our results suggest that exposure to supportive, oppositional, or mixed political networks on social media can be explained by broader patterns of political conversation (i.e., structure of offline networks) and specific habits in the political use of social media (i.e., the intensity of political discussion). These findings suggest that disagreement persists on social media even when ideological homophily is the modal outcome, and that scholars should pay more attention to specific situational and dispositional factors when evaluating the implications of social media for political communication.

AB - Scholars have debated whether social media platforms, by allowing users to select the information to which they are exposed, may lead people to isolate themselves from viewpoints with which they disagree, thereby serving as political “echo chambers.” We investigate hypotheses concerning the circumstances under which Twitter users who communicate about elections would engage with (a) supportive, (b) oppositional, and (c) mixed political networks. Based on online surveys of representative samples of Italian and German individuals who posted at least one Twitter message about elections in 2013, we find substantial differences in the extent to which social media facilitates exposure to similar versus dissimilar political views. Our results suggest that exposure to supportive, oppositional, or mixed political networks on social media can be explained by broader patterns of political conversation (i.e., structure of offline networks) and specific habits in the political use of social media (i.e., the intensity of political discussion). These findings suggest that disagreement persists on social media even when ideological homophily is the modal outcome, and that scholars should pay more attention to specific situational and dispositional factors when evaluating the implications of social media for political communication.

KW - political disagreement

KW - political discussion

KW - political homophily

KW - political networks

KW - social media

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029428654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029428654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2056305116664221

DO - 10.1177/2056305116664221

M3 - Article

VL - 2

JO - Social Media and Society

JF - Social Media and Society

SN - 2056-3051

IS - 3

ER -