Occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation has an activity-dependent suppressive effect

Francesca Perini, Luigi Cattaneo, Marisa Carrasco-Queijeiro, Jens V. Schwarzbach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) vary depending on the brain state at the stimulation moment. Four mechanisms have been proposed to underlie these effects: (1) virtual lesion-TMS suppresses neural signals; (2) preferential activation of less active neurons- TMS drives up activity in the stimulated area, but active neurons are saturating; (3) noise generation-TMS adds random neuronal activity, and its effect interacts with stimulus intensity; and (4) noise generation-TMS adds random neuronal activity, and its effect depends on TMS intensity. Here we explore these hypotheses by investigating the effects of TMS on early visual cortex by assessing the contrast response function while varying the adaptation state of the observers. We tested human participants in an orientation discrimination task, in which performance is contingent upon contrast sensitivity. Before each trial, neuronal activation of visual cortex was altered through contrast adaptation to two flickering gratings. In a factorial design, with or without adaptation, a single TMS pulse was delivered simultaneously with targets of varying contrast. Adaptation decreased contrast sensitivity. The effect of TMS on performance was state dependent: TMS decreased contrast sensitivity in the absence of adaptation but increased it after adaptation. None of the proposed mechanisms can account for the results in their entirety, in particular, for the facilitatory effect at intermediate to high contrasts after adaptation. We propose an alternative hypothesis: TMS effects are activity dependent, so that TMS suppresses the most active neurons and thereby changes the balance between excitation and inhibition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12361-12365
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume32
Issue number36
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 5 2012

Fingerprint

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Contrast Sensitivity
Visual Cortex
Neurons
Noise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation has an activity-dependent suppressive effect. / Perini, Francesca; Cattaneo, Luigi; Carrasco-Queijeiro, Marisa; Schwarzbach, Jens V.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 32, No. 36, 05.09.2012, p. 12361-12365.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Perini, F, Cattaneo, L, Carrasco-Queijeiro, M & Schwarzbach, JV 2012, 'Occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation has an activity-dependent suppressive effect', Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 36, pp. 12361-12365. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5864-11.2012
Perini, Francesca ; Cattaneo, Luigi ; Carrasco-Queijeiro, Marisa ; Schwarzbach, Jens V. / Occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation has an activity-dependent suppressive effect. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 2012 ; Vol. 32, No. 36. pp. 12361-12365.
@article{52c2363fc5414c75aceecdbbb4d9b2e2,
title = "Occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation has an activity-dependent suppressive effect",
abstract = "The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) vary depending on the brain state at the stimulation moment. Four mechanisms have been proposed to underlie these effects: (1) virtual lesion-TMS suppresses neural signals; (2) preferential activation of less active neurons- TMS drives up activity in the stimulated area, but active neurons are saturating; (3) noise generation-TMS adds random neuronal activity, and its effect interacts with stimulus intensity; and (4) noise generation-TMS adds random neuronal activity, and its effect depends on TMS intensity. Here we explore these hypotheses by investigating the effects of TMS on early visual cortex by assessing the contrast response function while varying the adaptation state of the observers. We tested human participants in an orientation discrimination task, in which performance is contingent upon contrast sensitivity. Before each trial, neuronal activation of visual cortex was altered through contrast adaptation to two flickering gratings. In a factorial design, with or without adaptation, a single TMS pulse was delivered simultaneously with targets of varying contrast. Adaptation decreased contrast sensitivity. The effect of TMS on performance was state dependent: TMS decreased contrast sensitivity in the absence of adaptation but increased it after adaptation. None of the proposed mechanisms can account for the results in their entirety, in particular, for the facilitatory effect at intermediate to high contrasts after adaptation. We propose an alternative hypothesis: TMS effects are activity dependent, so that TMS suppresses the most active neurons and thereby changes the balance between excitation and inhibition.",
author = "Francesca Perini and Luigi Cattaneo and Marisa Carrasco-Queijeiro and Schwarzbach, {Jens V.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5864-11.2012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "12361--12365",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "36",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation has an activity-dependent suppressive effect

AU - Perini, Francesca

AU - Cattaneo, Luigi

AU - Carrasco-Queijeiro, Marisa

AU - Schwarzbach, Jens V.

PY - 2012/9/5

Y1 - 2012/9/5

N2 - The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) vary depending on the brain state at the stimulation moment. Four mechanisms have been proposed to underlie these effects: (1) virtual lesion-TMS suppresses neural signals; (2) preferential activation of less active neurons- TMS drives up activity in the stimulated area, but active neurons are saturating; (3) noise generation-TMS adds random neuronal activity, and its effect interacts with stimulus intensity; and (4) noise generation-TMS adds random neuronal activity, and its effect depends on TMS intensity. Here we explore these hypotheses by investigating the effects of TMS on early visual cortex by assessing the contrast response function while varying the adaptation state of the observers. We tested human participants in an orientation discrimination task, in which performance is contingent upon contrast sensitivity. Before each trial, neuronal activation of visual cortex was altered through contrast adaptation to two flickering gratings. In a factorial design, with or without adaptation, a single TMS pulse was delivered simultaneously with targets of varying contrast. Adaptation decreased contrast sensitivity. The effect of TMS on performance was state dependent: TMS decreased contrast sensitivity in the absence of adaptation but increased it after adaptation. None of the proposed mechanisms can account for the results in their entirety, in particular, for the facilitatory effect at intermediate to high contrasts after adaptation. We propose an alternative hypothesis: TMS effects are activity dependent, so that TMS suppresses the most active neurons and thereby changes the balance between excitation and inhibition.

AB - The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) vary depending on the brain state at the stimulation moment. Four mechanisms have been proposed to underlie these effects: (1) virtual lesion-TMS suppresses neural signals; (2) preferential activation of less active neurons- TMS drives up activity in the stimulated area, but active neurons are saturating; (3) noise generation-TMS adds random neuronal activity, and its effect interacts with stimulus intensity; and (4) noise generation-TMS adds random neuronal activity, and its effect depends on TMS intensity. Here we explore these hypotheses by investigating the effects of TMS on early visual cortex by assessing the contrast response function while varying the adaptation state of the observers. We tested human participants in an orientation discrimination task, in which performance is contingent upon contrast sensitivity. Before each trial, neuronal activation of visual cortex was altered through contrast adaptation to two flickering gratings. In a factorial design, with or without adaptation, a single TMS pulse was delivered simultaneously with targets of varying contrast. Adaptation decreased contrast sensitivity. The effect of TMS on performance was state dependent: TMS decreased contrast sensitivity in the absence of adaptation but increased it after adaptation. None of the proposed mechanisms can account for the results in their entirety, in particular, for the facilitatory effect at intermediate to high contrasts after adaptation. We propose an alternative hypothesis: TMS effects are activity dependent, so that TMS suppresses the most active neurons and thereby changes the balance between excitation and inhibition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865767566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865767566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5864-11.2012

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5864-11.2012

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 12361

EP - 12365

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 36

ER -