Object-based benefits without object-based representations

Daryl Fougnie, Sarah M. Cormiea, George A. Alvarez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Influential theories of visual working memory have proposed that the basic units of memory are integrated object representations. Key support for this proposal is provided by the same object benefit: It is easier to remember multiple features of a single object than the same set of features distributed across multiple objects. Here, we replicate the object benefit but demonstrate that features are not stored as single, integrated representations. Specifically, participants could remember 10 features better when arranged in 5 objects compared to 10 objects, yet memory for one object feature was largely independent of memory for the other object feature. These results rule out the possibility that integrated representations drive the object benefit and require a revision of the concept of object-based memory representations. We propose that working memory is object-based in regard to the factors that enhance performance but feature based in regard to the level of representational failure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)621-626
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume142
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Drive

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Features
  • Objects
  • Short-term memory
  • Working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

Object-based benefits without object-based representations. / Fougnie, Daryl; Cormiea, Sarah M.; Alvarez, George A.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 142, No. 3, 01.01.2013, p. 621-626.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fougnie, Daryl ; Cormiea, Sarah M. ; Alvarez, George A. / Object-based benefits without object-based representations. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2013 ; Vol. 142, No. 3. pp. 621-626.
@article{dd2d364c06d14f82809aa202e8d6a180,
title = "Object-based benefits without object-based representations",
abstract = "Influential theories of visual working memory have proposed that the basic units of memory are integrated object representations. Key support for this proposal is provided by the same object benefit: It is easier to remember multiple features of a single object than the same set of features distributed across multiple objects. Here, we replicate the object benefit but demonstrate that features are not stored as single, integrated representations. Specifically, participants could remember 10 features better when arranged in 5 objects compared to 10 objects, yet memory for one object feature was largely independent of memory for the other object feature. These results rule out the possibility that integrated representations drive the object benefit and require a revision of the concept of object-based memory representations. We propose that working memory is object-based in regard to the factors that enhance performance but feature based in regard to the level of representational failure.",
keywords = "Attention, Features, Objects, Short-term memory, Working memory",
author = "Daryl Fougnie and Cormiea, {Sarah M.} and Alvarez, {George A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0030300",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "621--626",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Object-based benefits without object-based representations

AU - Fougnie, Daryl

AU - Cormiea, Sarah M.

AU - Alvarez, George A.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Influential theories of visual working memory have proposed that the basic units of memory are integrated object representations. Key support for this proposal is provided by the same object benefit: It is easier to remember multiple features of a single object than the same set of features distributed across multiple objects. Here, we replicate the object benefit but demonstrate that features are not stored as single, integrated representations. Specifically, participants could remember 10 features better when arranged in 5 objects compared to 10 objects, yet memory for one object feature was largely independent of memory for the other object feature. These results rule out the possibility that integrated representations drive the object benefit and require a revision of the concept of object-based memory representations. We propose that working memory is object-based in regard to the factors that enhance performance but feature based in regard to the level of representational failure.

AB - Influential theories of visual working memory have proposed that the basic units of memory are integrated object representations. Key support for this proposal is provided by the same object benefit: It is easier to remember multiple features of a single object than the same set of features distributed across multiple objects. Here, we replicate the object benefit but demonstrate that features are not stored as single, integrated representations. Specifically, participants could remember 10 features better when arranged in 5 objects compared to 10 objects, yet memory for one object feature was largely independent of memory for the other object feature. These results rule out the possibility that integrated representations drive the object benefit and require a revision of the concept of object-based memory representations. We propose that working memory is object-based in regard to the factors that enhance performance but feature based in regard to the level of representational failure.

KW - Attention

KW - Features

KW - Objects

KW - Short-term memory

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888053904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888053904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0030300

DO - 10.1037/a0030300

M3 - Article

C2 - 23067063

AN - SCOPUS:84888053904

VL - 142

SP - 621

EP - 626

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 3

ER -