Nurses' Perspectives on the Intersection of Safety and Informed Decision Making in Maternity Care

Carrie H. Jacobson, Marya G. Zlatnik, Holly Powell Kennedy, Audrey Lyndon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To explore maternity nurses' perceptions of women's informed decision making during labor and birth to better understand how interdisciplinary communication challenges might affect patient safety. Design: Constructivist grounded theory. Setting: Four hospitals in the western United States. Participants: Forty-six (46) nurses and physicians practicing in maternity units. Method: Data collection strategies included individual interviews and participant observation. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method, dimensional analysis, and situational analysis (Charmaz, ; Clarke, ; Schatzman, ). Results: The nurses' central action of holding off harm encompassed three communication strategies: persuading agreement, managing information, and coaching of mothers and physicians. These strategies were executed in a complex, hierarchical context characterized by varied practice patterns and relationships. Nurses' priorities and patient safety goals were sometimes misaligned with those of physicians, resulting in potentially unsafe communication. Conclusions: The communication strategies nurses employed resulted in intended and unintended consequences with safety implications for mothers and providers and had the potential to trap women in the middle of interprofessional conflicts and differences of opinion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)577-587
Number of pages11
JournalJOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Nurses
Safety
Communication
Patient Safety
Physicians
Interdisciplinary Communication
Mothers
Observation
Parturition
Interviews

Keywords

  • Childbirth
  • Communication
  • Grounded theory
  • Maternity nursing
  • Patient safety
  • United States

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics
  • Critical Care
  • Maternity and Midwifery

Cite this

Nurses' Perspectives on the Intersection of Safety and Informed Decision Making in Maternity Care. / Jacobson, Carrie H.; Zlatnik, Marya G.; Kennedy, Holly Powell; Lyndon, Audrey.

In: JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, Vol. 42, No. 5, 01.01.2013, p. 577-587.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8b44803cbf91496b855283caeb5bbecb,
title = "Nurses' Perspectives on the Intersection of Safety and Informed Decision Making in Maternity Care",
abstract = "Objective: To explore maternity nurses' perceptions of women's informed decision making during labor and birth to better understand how interdisciplinary communication challenges might affect patient safety. Design: Constructivist grounded theory. Setting: Four hospitals in the western United States. Participants: Forty-six (46) nurses and physicians practicing in maternity units. Method: Data collection strategies included individual interviews and participant observation. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method, dimensional analysis, and situational analysis (Charmaz, ; Clarke, ; Schatzman, ). Results: The nurses' central action of holding off harm encompassed three communication strategies: persuading agreement, managing information, and coaching of mothers and physicians. These strategies were executed in a complex, hierarchical context characterized by varied practice patterns and relationships. Nurses' priorities and patient safety goals were sometimes misaligned with those of physicians, resulting in potentially unsafe communication. Conclusions: The communication strategies nurses employed resulted in intended and unintended consequences with safety implications for mothers and providers and had the potential to trap women in the middle of interprofessional conflicts and differences of opinion.",
keywords = "Childbirth, Communication, Grounded theory, Maternity nursing, Patient safety, United States",
author = "Jacobson, {Carrie H.} and Zlatnik, {Marya G.} and Kennedy, {Holly Powell} and Audrey Lyndon",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1552-6909.12232",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "577--587",
journal = "JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing",
issn = "0884-2175",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nurses' Perspectives on the Intersection of Safety and Informed Decision Making in Maternity Care

AU - Jacobson, Carrie H.

AU - Zlatnik, Marya G.

AU - Kennedy, Holly Powell

AU - Lyndon, Audrey

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Objective: To explore maternity nurses' perceptions of women's informed decision making during labor and birth to better understand how interdisciplinary communication challenges might affect patient safety. Design: Constructivist grounded theory. Setting: Four hospitals in the western United States. Participants: Forty-six (46) nurses and physicians practicing in maternity units. Method: Data collection strategies included individual interviews and participant observation. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method, dimensional analysis, and situational analysis (Charmaz, ; Clarke, ; Schatzman, ). Results: The nurses' central action of holding off harm encompassed three communication strategies: persuading agreement, managing information, and coaching of mothers and physicians. These strategies were executed in a complex, hierarchical context characterized by varied practice patterns and relationships. Nurses' priorities and patient safety goals were sometimes misaligned with those of physicians, resulting in potentially unsafe communication. Conclusions: The communication strategies nurses employed resulted in intended and unintended consequences with safety implications for mothers and providers and had the potential to trap women in the middle of interprofessional conflicts and differences of opinion.

AB - Objective: To explore maternity nurses' perceptions of women's informed decision making during labor and birth to better understand how interdisciplinary communication challenges might affect patient safety. Design: Constructivist grounded theory. Setting: Four hospitals in the western United States. Participants: Forty-six (46) nurses and physicians practicing in maternity units. Method: Data collection strategies included individual interviews and participant observation. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method, dimensional analysis, and situational analysis (Charmaz, ; Clarke, ; Schatzman, ). Results: The nurses' central action of holding off harm encompassed three communication strategies: persuading agreement, managing information, and coaching of mothers and physicians. These strategies were executed in a complex, hierarchical context characterized by varied practice patterns and relationships. Nurses' priorities and patient safety goals were sometimes misaligned with those of physicians, resulting in potentially unsafe communication. Conclusions: The communication strategies nurses employed resulted in intended and unintended consequences with safety implications for mothers and providers and had the potential to trap women in the middle of interprofessional conflicts and differences of opinion.

KW - Childbirth

KW - Communication

KW - Grounded theory

KW - Maternity nursing

KW - Patient safety

KW - United States

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883810022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883810022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1552-6909.12232

DO - 10.1111/1552-6909.12232

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 577

EP - 587

JO - JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing

JF - JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing

SN - 0884-2175

IS - 5

ER -