Null's the word: A comparison of memory quality for intensely negative and positive events

Theo Waters, Jennifer G. Bohanek, Kelly Marin, Robyn Fivush

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Research comparing memories of traumatic and positive events has produced inconsistent results. Complicating the issue, researchers employ a variety of measures (e.g., narrative or questionnaire) that make comparison across studies difficult. Further, this research has been criticised for lacking adequate statistical controls (Sotgiu & Mormont, 2008). Our study employed both narrative and questionnaire methodologies and compared memories for highly negative and positive events while controlling for retention interval, intensity of the event, and word count in the narrative measures. A total of 108 racially diverse college undergraduates wrote narratives and completed the Memory Characteristics Questionnaire about the most negative and the most positive event they had experienced, and memories were assessed for narrative coherence, language indicative of cognition, insight and sensory experience, subjective ratings of clarity, sensory detail, contextual detail, temporal detail, and the inclusion of thoughts and feelings. Results indicate no differences between memories for highly negative and positive events when retention interval and emotional intensity are controlled.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)633-645
Number of pages13
JournalMemory
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2013

Fingerprint

Research
Cognition
Emotions
Language
Research Personnel
Surveys and Questionnaires
Questionnaire
Retention (Psychology)
Methodology
Rating
Contextual
Sensory Experience
Clarity
Controlled
Inclusion
Undergraduate
Emotion
Indicative

Keywords

  • Autobiographical memory
  • Emotion
  • Memory quality
  • Trauma
  • Valence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Null's the word : A comparison of memory quality for intensely negative and positive events. / Waters, Theo; Bohanek, Jennifer G.; Marin, Kelly; Fivush, Robyn.

In: Memory, Vol. 21, No. 6, 01.08.2013, p. 633-645.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Waters, Theo ; Bohanek, Jennifer G. ; Marin, Kelly ; Fivush, Robyn. / Null's the word : A comparison of memory quality for intensely negative and positive events. In: Memory. 2013 ; Vol. 21, No. 6. pp. 633-645.
@article{e750d842645747ef90aadb806d62ec46,
title = "Null's the word: A comparison of memory quality for intensely negative and positive events",
abstract = "Research comparing memories of traumatic and positive events has produced inconsistent results. Complicating the issue, researchers employ a variety of measures (e.g., narrative or questionnaire) that make comparison across studies difficult. Further, this research has been criticised for lacking adequate statistical controls (Sotgiu & Mormont, 2008). Our study employed both narrative and questionnaire methodologies and compared memories for highly negative and positive events while controlling for retention interval, intensity of the event, and word count in the narrative measures. A total of 108 racially diverse college undergraduates wrote narratives and completed the Memory Characteristics Questionnaire about the most negative and the most positive event they had experienced, and memories were assessed for narrative coherence, language indicative of cognition, insight and sensory experience, subjective ratings of clarity, sensory detail, contextual detail, temporal detail, and the inclusion of thoughts and feelings. Results indicate no differences between memories for highly negative and positive events when retention interval and emotional intensity are controlled.",
keywords = "Autobiographical memory, Emotion, Memory quality, Trauma, Valence",
author = "Theo Waters and Bohanek, {Jennifer G.} and Kelly Marin and Robyn Fivush",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09658211.2012.745877",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "633--645",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "0965-8211",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Null's the word

T2 - A comparison of memory quality for intensely negative and positive events

AU - Waters, Theo

AU - Bohanek, Jennifer G.

AU - Marin, Kelly

AU - Fivush, Robyn

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - Research comparing memories of traumatic and positive events has produced inconsistent results. Complicating the issue, researchers employ a variety of measures (e.g., narrative or questionnaire) that make comparison across studies difficult. Further, this research has been criticised for lacking adequate statistical controls (Sotgiu & Mormont, 2008). Our study employed both narrative and questionnaire methodologies and compared memories for highly negative and positive events while controlling for retention interval, intensity of the event, and word count in the narrative measures. A total of 108 racially diverse college undergraduates wrote narratives and completed the Memory Characteristics Questionnaire about the most negative and the most positive event they had experienced, and memories were assessed for narrative coherence, language indicative of cognition, insight and sensory experience, subjective ratings of clarity, sensory detail, contextual detail, temporal detail, and the inclusion of thoughts and feelings. Results indicate no differences between memories for highly negative and positive events when retention interval and emotional intensity are controlled.

AB - Research comparing memories of traumatic and positive events has produced inconsistent results. Complicating the issue, researchers employ a variety of measures (e.g., narrative or questionnaire) that make comparison across studies difficult. Further, this research has been criticised for lacking adequate statistical controls (Sotgiu & Mormont, 2008). Our study employed both narrative and questionnaire methodologies and compared memories for highly negative and positive events while controlling for retention interval, intensity of the event, and word count in the narrative measures. A total of 108 racially diverse college undergraduates wrote narratives and completed the Memory Characteristics Questionnaire about the most negative and the most positive event they had experienced, and memories were assessed for narrative coherence, language indicative of cognition, insight and sensory experience, subjective ratings of clarity, sensory detail, contextual detail, temporal detail, and the inclusion of thoughts and feelings. Results indicate no differences between memories for highly negative and positive events when retention interval and emotional intensity are controlled.

KW - Autobiographical memory

KW - Emotion

KW - Memory quality

KW - Trauma

KW - Valence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880932920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880932920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09658211.2012.745877

DO - 10.1080/09658211.2012.745877

M3 - Article

C2 - 23215945

AN - SCOPUS:84880932920

VL - 21

SP - 633

EP - 645

JO - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 0965-8211

IS - 6

ER -