Not Noisy, Just Wrong: The Role of Suboptimal Inference in Behavioral Variability

Jeffrey M. Beck, Wei Ji Ma, Xaq Pitkow, Peter E. Latham, Alexandre Pouget

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Behavior varies from trial to trial even when the stimulus is maintained as constant as possible. In many models, this variability is attributed to noise in the brain. Here, we propose that there is another major source of variability: suboptimal inference. Importantly, we argue that in most tasks of interest, and particularly complex ones, suboptimal inference is likely to be the dominant component of behavioral variability. This perspective explains a variety of intriguing observations, including why variability appears to be larger on the sensory than on the motor side, and why our sensors are sometimes surprisingly unreliable. Behavioral variability has often been attributed to noise in the brain. In this Perspective, Pouget and colleagues propose that there is another major source of variability, suboptimal inference, which is the dominant component of behavioral variability in complex tasks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-39
Number of pages10
JournalNeuron
Volume74
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 12 2012

Fingerprint

Noise
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Not Noisy, Just Wrong : The Role of Suboptimal Inference in Behavioral Variability. / Beck, Jeffrey M.; Ma, Wei Ji; Pitkow, Xaq; Latham, Peter E.; Pouget, Alexandre.

In: Neuron, Vol. 74, No. 1, 12.04.2012, p. 30-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beck, Jeffrey M. ; Ma, Wei Ji ; Pitkow, Xaq ; Latham, Peter E. ; Pouget, Alexandre. / Not Noisy, Just Wrong : The Role of Suboptimal Inference in Behavioral Variability. In: Neuron. 2012 ; Vol. 74, No. 1. pp. 30-39.
@article{2f76e0004c1d41eeab548513f2bf052c,
title = "Not Noisy, Just Wrong: The Role of Suboptimal Inference in Behavioral Variability",
abstract = "Behavior varies from trial to trial even when the stimulus is maintained as constant as possible. In many models, this variability is attributed to noise in the brain. Here, we propose that there is another major source of variability: suboptimal inference. Importantly, we argue that in most tasks of interest, and particularly complex ones, suboptimal inference is likely to be the dominant component of behavioral variability. This perspective explains a variety of intriguing observations, including why variability appears to be larger on the sensory than on the motor side, and why our sensors are sometimes surprisingly unreliable. Behavioral variability has often been attributed to noise in the brain. In this Perspective, Pouget and colleagues propose that there is another major source of variability, suboptimal inference, which is the dominant component of behavioral variability in complex tasks.",
author = "Beck, {Jeffrey M.} and Ma, {Wei Ji} and Xaq Pitkow and Latham, {Peter E.} and Alexandre Pouget",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "30--39",
journal = "Neuron",
issn = "0896-6273",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not Noisy, Just Wrong

T2 - The Role of Suboptimal Inference in Behavioral Variability

AU - Beck, Jeffrey M.

AU - Ma, Wei Ji

AU - Pitkow, Xaq

AU - Latham, Peter E.

AU - Pouget, Alexandre

PY - 2012/4/12

Y1 - 2012/4/12

N2 - Behavior varies from trial to trial even when the stimulus is maintained as constant as possible. In many models, this variability is attributed to noise in the brain. Here, we propose that there is another major source of variability: suboptimal inference. Importantly, we argue that in most tasks of interest, and particularly complex ones, suboptimal inference is likely to be the dominant component of behavioral variability. This perspective explains a variety of intriguing observations, including why variability appears to be larger on the sensory than on the motor side, and why our sensors are sometimes surprisingly unreliable. Behavioral variability has often been attributed to noise in the brain. In this Perspective, Pouget and colleagues propose that there is another major source of variability, suboptimal inference, which is the dominant component of behavioral variability in complex tasks.

AB - Behavior varies from trial to trial even when the stimulus is maintained as constant as possible. In many models, this variability is attributed to noise in the brain. Here, we propose that there is another major source of variability: suboptimal inference. Importantly, we argue that in most tasks of interest, and particularly complex ones, suboptimal inference is likely to be the dominant component of behavioral variability. This perspective explains a variety of intriguing observations, including why variability appears to be larger on the sensory than on the motor side, and why our sensors are sometimes surprisingly unreliable. Behavioral variability has often been attributed to noise in the brain. In this Perspective, Pouget and colleagues propose that there is another major source of variability, suboptimal inference, which is the dominant component of behavioral variability in complex tasks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859638124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859638124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.016

DO - 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 22500627

AN - SCOPUS:84859638124

VL - 74

SP - 30

EP - 39

JO - Neuron

JF - Neuron

SN - 0896-6273

IS - 1

ER -