Not even

Christopher Collins

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This paper proposes an analysis of the semantics of even that is consistent with the assumptions about the syntax and semantics of negation in Collins and Postal (Classical NEG raising, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2014). First, I review the distribution of negation, showing how negation may modify quantificational expressions where it gives rise to scope freezing effects. Second, I discuss the fact that even-phrases can be modified by negation, as in Not even John is there. On the basis of this fact, I argue that even is a quantifier. Lastly, I show that my data provides new empirical support for the assumption that there are two kinds of even, depending on the role played by focus in the scalar presupposition.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)291-303
    Number of pages13
    JournalNatural Language Semantics
    Volume24
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    semantics
    syntax
    Negation

    Keywords

    • Even
    • Existential presupposition
    • NEG raising
    • Negation
    • Negative polarity items
    • Scalar presupposition
    • Scope freezing

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Philosophy
    • Linguistics and Language

    Cite this

    Not even. / Collins, Christopher.

    In: Natural Language Semantics, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 291-303.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Collins, C 2016, 'Not even', Natural Language Semantics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 291-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-016-9124-5
    Collins, Christopher. / Not even. In: Natural Language Semantics. 2016 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 291-303.
    @article{1c58c7cb112f4ff9a49884bb413ed1a1,
    title = "Not even",
    abstract = "This paper proposes an analysis of the semantics of even that is consistent with the assumptions about the syntax and semantics of negation in Collins and Postal (Classical NEG raising, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2014). First, I review the distribution of negation, showing how negation may modify quantificational expressions where it gives rise to scope freezing effects. Second, I discuss the fact that even-phrases can be modified by negation, as in Not even John is there. On the basis of this fact, I argue that even is a quantifier. Lastly, I show that my data provides new empirical support for the assumption that there are two kinds of even, depending on the role played by focus in the scalar presupposition.",
    keywords = "Even, Existential presupposition, NEG raising, Negation, Negative polarity items, Scalar presupposition, Scope freezing",
    author = "Christopher Collins",
    year = "2016",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/s11050-016-9124-5",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "291--303",
    journal = "Natural Language Semantics",
    issn = "0925-854X",
    publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Not even

    AU - Collins, Christopher

    PY - 2016/12/1

    Y1 - 2016/12/1

    N2 - This paper proposes an analysis of the semantics of even that is consistent with the assumptions about the syntax and semantics of negation in Collins and Postal (Classical NEG raising, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2014). First, I review the distribution of negation, showing how negation may modify quantificational expressions where it gives rise to scope freezing effects. Second, I discuss the fact that even-phrases can be modified by negation, as in Not even John is there. On the basis of this fact, I argue that even is a quantifier. Lastly, I show that my data provides new empirical support for the assumption that there are two kinds of even, depending on the role played by focus in the scalar presupposition.

    AB - This paper proposes an analysis of the semantics of even that is consistent with the assumptions about the syntax and semantics of negation in Collins and Postal (Classical NEG raising, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2014). First, I review the distribution of negation, showing how negation may modify quantificational expressions where it gives rise to scope freezing effects. Second, I discuss the fact that even-phrases can be modified by negation, as in Not even John is there. On the basis of this fact, I argue that even is a quantifier. Lastly, I show that my data provides new empirical support for the assumption that there are two kinds of even, depending on the role played by focus in the scalar presupposition.

    KW - Even

    KW - Existential presupposition

    KW - NEG raising

    KW - Negation

    KW - Negative polarity items

    KW - Scalar presupposition

    KW - Scope freezing

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978145272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978145272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s11050-016-9124-5

    DO - 10.1007/s11050-016-9124-5

    M3 - Article

    VL - 24

    SP - 291

    EP - 303

    JO - Natural Language Semantics

    JF - Natural Language Semantics

    SN - 0925-854X

    IS - 4

    ER -