Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs PREDICT system-justifying attitudes

Erin P. Hennes, H. Hannah Nam, Chadly Stern, John T. Jost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Whereas most social psychological perspectives assume that needs to manage uncertainty, existential anxiety, and social cohesion should motivate any form of ideological zeal, System Justification Theory predicts that these needs are positively associated with the endorsement of system-justifying beliefs, opinions, and values but negatively associated with the endorsement of system-challenging ideological outcomes. For the first time we test a full theoretical model in which system justification mediates the effects of individual differences in epistemic, existential, and relational needs on attitudes toward public policy issues and social movements. Specifically, we conducted a national survey of 182 Americans and found that, as hypothesized, lower need for cognition, greater death anxiety, and a stronger desire to share reality each contributed significantly and independently to economic system justification, which, in turn, contributed to support for the Tea Party (a movement aimed at restoring America's "traditional values") and opposition to Occupy Wall Street (a movement seeking to reduce social and economic inequality and minimize corporate influence on government). Economic system justification also mediated the effects of these needs on the endorsement of status quo positions with respect to health care, immigration, global climate change, and the "Ground Zero mosque." These findings suggest that epistemic, existential, and relational needs lead disproportionately to support for system-justifying, rather than system-challenging, policies and movements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)669-688
Number of pages20
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume30
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Economics
Anxiety
Climate Change
Emigration and Immigration
Tea
Public Policy
Individuality
Cognition
Uncertainty
Theoretical Models
Psychology
Delivery of Health Care
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Not all ideologies are created equal : Epistemic, existential, and relational needs PREDICT system-justifying attitudes. / Hennes, Erin P.; Nam, H. Hannah; Stern, Chadly; Jost, John T.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 30, No. 6, 2012, p. 669-688.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a40d4b4c9f044285bdb297e227e71785,
title = "Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs PREDICT system-justifying attitudes",
abstract = "Whereas most social psychological perspectives assume that needs to manage uncertainty, existential anxiety, and social cohesion should motivate any form of ideological zeal, System Justification Theory predicts that these needs are positively associated with the endorsement of system-justifying beliefs, opinions, and values but negatively associated with the endorsement of system-challenging ideological outcomes. For the first time we test a full theoretical model in which system justification mediates the effects of individual differences in epistemic, existential, and relational needs on attitudes toward public policy issues and social movements. Specifically, we conducted a national survey of 182 Americans and found that, as hypothesized, lower need for cognition, greater death anxiety, and a stronger desire to share reality each contributed significantly and independently to economic system justification, which, in turn, contributed to support for the Tea Party (a movement aimed at restoring America's {"}traditional values{"}) and opposition to Occupy Wall Street (a movement seeking to reduce social and economic inequality and minimize corporate influence on government). Economic system justification also mediated the effects of these needs on the endorsement of status quo positions with respect to health care, immigration, global climate change, and the {"}Ground Zero mosque.{"} These findings suggest that epistemic, existential, and relational needs lead disproportionately to support for system-justifying, rather than system-challenging, policies and movements.",
author = "Hennes, {Erin P.} and Nam, {H. Hannah} and Chadly Stern and Jost, {John T.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "669--688",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not all ideologies are created equal

T2 - Epistemic, existential, and relational needs PREDICT system-justifying attitudes

AU - Hennes, Erin P.

AU - Nam, H. Hannah

AU - Stern, Chadly

AU - Jost, John T.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Whereas most social psychological perspectives assume that needs to manage uncertainty, existential anxiety, and social cohesion should motivate any form of ideological zeal, System Justification Theory predicts that these needs are positively associated with the endorsement of system-justifying beliefs, opinions, and values but negatively associated with the endorsement of system-challenging ideological outcomes. For the first time we test a full theoretical model in which system justification mediates the effects of individual differences in epistemic, existential, and relational needs on attitudes toward public policy issues and social movements. Specifically, we conducted a national survey of 182 Americans and found that, as hypothesized, lower need for cognition, greater death anxiety, and a stronger desire to share reality each contributed significantly and independently to economic system justification, which, in turn, contributed to support for the Tea Party (a movement aimed at restoring America's "traditional values") and opposition to Occupy Wall Street (a movement seeking to reduce social and economic inequality and minimize corporate influence on government). Economic system justification also mediated the effects of these needs on the endorsement of status quo positions with respect to health care, immigration, global climate change, and the "Ground Zero mosque." These findings suggest that epistemic, existential, and relational needs lead disproportionately to support for system-justifying, rather than system-challenging, policies and movements.

AB - Whereas most social psychological perspectives assume that needs to manage uncertainty, existential anxiety, and social cohesion should motivate any form of ideological zeal, System Justification Theory predicts that these needs are positively associated with the endorsement of system-justifying beliefs, opinions, and values but negatively associated with the endorsement of system-challenging ideological outcomes. For the first time we test a full theoretical model in which system justification mediates the effects of individual differences in epistemic, existential, and relational needs on attitudes toward public policy issues and social movements. Specifically, we conducted a national survey of 182 Americans and found that, as hypothesized, lower need for cognition, greater death anxiety, and a stronger desire to share reality each contributed significantly and independently to economic system justification, which, in turn, contributed to support for the Tea Party (a movement aimed at restoring America's "traditional values") and opposition to Occupy Wall Street (a movement seeking to reduce social and economic inequality and minimize corporate influence on government). Economic system justification also mediated the effects of these needs on the endorsement of status quo positions with respect to health care, immigration, global climate change, and the "Ground Zero mosque." These findings suggest that epistemic, existential, and relational needs lead disproportionately to support for system-justifying, rather than system-challenging, policies and movements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872558267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872558267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669

DO - 10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84872558267

VL - 30

SP - 669

EP - 688

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016X

IS - 6

ER -