Noonday demons and midnight sorrows: Biology and meaning in disordered and normal sadness

Jerome C. Wakefield, Allan V. Horwitz

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Andrew Solomon's The Noonday Demon and his article in this issue (on which we focus our commentary) present an eloquent, wide-ranging, and non-reductionist portrayal of depression as a disorder of both biology and meaning. Solomon illustrates the contributions that psychodynamic and pharmacological therapies alike can make to the treatment of depression, emphasizing the interplay between exploration of meaning and biological manipulation of the brain. We argue that the link between biology and meaning may help to explain the notion that depression yields distinctive truths; depression can yield truths or suggest meanings that otherwise are hidden from us by the normal biology of our meaning systems. We also identify several limitations of Solomon's discussion. First, in light of recent evidence, Solomon is occasionally overenthusiastic about the benefits of medication. Second, he overemphasizes the role of depression in creating negative social circumstances when most evidence indicates that the condition is more a consequence than a cause of social environments. Finally, in light of our recent exploration of how psychiatry has confused intense normal sadness with depressive disorder (Horwitz and Wakefield, 2007), we examine Solomon's views on the distinction between sadness and depressive disorder. We argue that, although Solomon recognizes the importance of distinguishing normal sadness from depressive disorder, and even astutely characterizes the difference as anchored in evolutionary psychology, at times he mischaracterizes likely cases of normal sadness as depressive disorder. Overall, however, Solomon provides an exceptionally well-drawn portrayal of the nature, causes, and treatments of depression.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)551-570
    Number of pages20
    JournalContemporary Psychoanalysis
    Volume44
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 1 2008

    Fingerprint

    Depression
    Depressive Disorder
    Social Environment
    Psychiatry
    Pharmacology
    Psychology
    Brain
    Therapeutics

    Keywords

    • Antidepressant medication
    • Depression
    • Evolutionary psychology
    • Harmful dysfunction
    • Psychiatric diagnosis
    • Sadness

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Clinical Psychology
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Cite this

    Noonday demons and midnight sorrows : Biology and meaning in disordered and normal sadness. / Wakefield, Jerome C.; Horwitz, Allan V.

    In: Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 44, No. 4, 01.10.2008, p. 551-570.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Wakefield, Jerome C. ; Horwitz, Allan V. / Noonday demons and midnight sorrows : Biology and meaning in disordered and normal sadness. In: Contemporary Psychoanalysis. 2008 ; Vol. 44, No. 4. pp. 551-570.
    @article{0ad30b39a62844bbad1d94f00e8c97e4,
    title = "Noonday demons and midnight sorrows: Biology and meaning in disordered and normal sadness",
    abstract = "Andrew Solomon's The Noonday Demon and his article in this issue (on which we focus our commentary) present an eloquent, wide-ranging, and non-reductionist portrayal of depression as a disorder of both biology and meaning. Solomon illustrates the contributions that psychodynamic and pharmacological therapies alike can make to the treatment of depression, emphasizing the interplay between exploration of meaning and biological manipulation of the brain. We argue that the link between biology and meaning may help to explain the notion that depression yields distinctive truths; depression can yield truths or suggest meanings that otherwise are hidden from us by the normal biology of our meaning systems. We also identify several limitations of Solomon's discussion. First, in light of recent evidence, Solomon is occasionally overenthusiastic about the benefits of medication. Second, he overemphasizes the role of depression in creating negative social circumstances when most evidence indicates that the condition is more a consequence than a cause of social environments. Finally, in light of our recent exploration of how psychiatry has confused intense normal sadness with depressive disorder (Horwitz and Wakefield, 2007), we examine Solomon's views on the distinction between sadness and depressive disorder. We argue that, although Solomon recognizes the importance of distinguishing normal sadness from depressive disorder, and even astutely characterizes the difference as anchored in evolutionary psychology, at times he mischaracterizes likely cases of normal sadness as depressive disorder. Overall, however, Solomon provides an exceptionally well-drawn portrayal of the nature, causes, and treatments of depression.",
    keywords = "Antidepressant medication, Depression, Evolutionary psychology, Harmful dysfunction, Psychiatric diagnosis, Sadness",
    author = "Wakefield, {Jerome C.} and Horwitz, {Allan V.}",
    year = "2008",
    month = "10",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1080/00107530.2008.10745975",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "44",
    pages = "551--570",
    journal = "Contemporary Psychoanalysis",
    issn = "0010-7530",
    publisher = "The William Alanson White Institute",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Noonday demons and midnight sorrows

    T2 - Biology and meaning in disordered and normal sadness

    AU - Wakefield, Jerome C.

    AU - Horwitz, Allan V.

    PY - 2008/10/1

    Y1 - 2008/10/1

    N2 - Andrew Solomon's The Noonday Demon and his article in this issue (on which we focus our commentary) present an eloquent, wide-ranging, and non-reductionist portrayal of depression as a disorder of both biology and meaning. Solomon illustrates the contributions that psychodynamic and pharmacological therapies alike can make to the treatment of depression, emphasizing the interplay between exploration of meaning and biological manipulation of the brain. We argue that the link between biology and meaning may help to explain the notion that depression yields distinctive truths; depression can yield truths or suggest meanings that otherwise are hidden from us by the normal biology of our meaning systems. We also identify several limitations of Solomon's discussion. First, in light of recent evidence, Solomon is occasionally overenthusiastic about the benefits of medication. Second, he overemphasizes the role of depression in creating negative social circumstances when most evidence indicates that the condition is more a consequence than a cause of social environments. Finally, in light of our recent exploration of how psychiatry has confused intense normal sadness with depressive disorder (Horwitz and Wakefield, 2007), we examine Solomon's views on the distinction between sadness and depressive disorder. We argue that, although Solomon recognizes the importance of distinguishing normal sadness from depressive disorder, and even astutely characterizes the difference as anchored in evolutionary psychology, at times he mischaracterizes likely cases of normal sadness as depressive disorder. Overall, however, Solomon provides an exceptionally well-drawn portrayal of the nature, causes, and treatments of depression.

    AB - Andrew Solomon's The Noonday Demon and his article in this issue (on which we focus our commentary) present an eloquent, wide-ranging, and non-reductionist portrayal of depression as a disorder of both biology and meaning. Solomon illustrates the contributions that psychodynamic and pharmacological therapies alike can make to the treatment of depression, emphasizing the interplay between exploration of meaning and biological manipulation of the brain. We argue that the link between biology and meaning may help to explain the notion that depression yields distinctive truths; depression can yield truths or suggest meanings that otherwise are hidden from us by the normal biology of our meaning systems. We also identify several limitations of Solomon's discussion. First, in light of recent evidence, Solomon is occasionally overenthusiastic about the benefits of medication. Second, he overemphasizes the role of depression in creating negative social circumstances when most evidence indicates that the condition is more a consequence than a cause of social environments. Finally, in light of our recent exploration of how psychiatry has confused intense normal sadness with depressive disorder (Horwitz and Wakefield, 2007), we examine Solomon's views on the distinction between sadness and depressive disorder. We argue that, although Solomon recognizes the importance of distinguishing normal sadness from depressive disorder, and even astutely characterizes the difference as anchored in evolutionary psychology, at times he mischaracterizes likely cases of normal sadness as depressive disorder. Overall, however, Solomon provides an exceptionally well-drawn portrayal of the nature, causes, and treatments of depression.

    KW - Antidepressant medication

    KW - Depression

    KW - Evolutionary psychology

    KW - Harmful dysfunction

    KW - Psychiatric diagnosis

    KW - Sadness

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54049097160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54049097160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/00107530.2008.10745975

    DO - 10.1080/00107530.2008.10745975

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:54049097160

    VL - 44

    SP - 551

    EP - 570

    JO - Contemporary Psychoanalysis

    JF - Contemporary Psychoanalysis

    SN - 0010-7530

    IS - 4

    ER -