Nonverbal and verbal content behaviors in the prediction of interviewer effectiveness

Donna K. Nagata, W. Robert Nay, Edward Seidman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Assessed the ecological validity of previous research (e.g., M. B. LaCrosse, 1975; J. R. Graves and J. D. Robinson, 1976) that has suggested that an interviewer's nonverbal behaviors predominate over verbal content in the prediction of interviewer effectiveness ratings. In contrast to earlier investigations, the current study assessed naturally occurring rather than manipulated interviewer behavior and used "client" ratings of effectiveness rather than observer ratings. Data were collected from analog interviews conducted by 40 counseling students with 80 undergraduates. Results indicate that nonverbal interviewer behaviors do not clearly predominate over verbal content behaviors in the prediction of effectiveness ratings. It is suggested that earlier findings of nonverbal superiority are not generalizable to more ecologically valid interview settings. (9 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)83-86
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Counseling Psychology
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1983

Fingerprint

Verbal Behavior
Interviews
Racquet Sports
Counseling
Students
Research

Keywords

  • nonverbal behavior vs verbal content of interviews, prediction of ratings of interviewer effectiveness, college students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Nonverbal and verbal content behaviors in the prediction of interviewer effectiveness. / Nagata, Donna K.; Nay, W. Robert; Seidman, Edward.

In: Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.1983, p. 83-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ee4ffc6333644637b6baa236e270d848,
title = "Nonverbal and verbal content behaviors in the prediction of interviewer effectiveness",
abstract = "Assessed the ecological validity of previous research (e.g., M. B. LaCrosse, 1975; J. R. Graves and J. D. Robinson, 1976) that has suggested that an interviewer's nonverbal behaviors predominate over verbal content in the prediction of interviewer effectiveness ratings. In contrast to earlier investigations, the current study assessed naturally occurring rather than manipulated interviewer behavior and used {"}client{"} ratings of effectiveness rather than observer ratings. Data were collected from analog interviews conducted by 40 counseling students with 80 undergraduates. Results indicate that nonverbal interviewer behaviors do not clearly predominate over verbal content behaviors in the prediction of effectiveness ratings. It is suggested that earlier findings of nonverbal superiority are not generalizable to more ecologically valid interview settings. (9 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "nonverbal behavior vs verbal content of interviews, prediction of ratings of interviewer effectiveness, college students",
author = "Nagata, {Donna K.} and Nay, {W. Robert} and Edward Seidman",
year = "1983",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1037//0022-0167.30.1.83",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "83--86",
journal = "Journal of Counseling Psychology",
issn = "0022-0167",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonverbal and verbal content behaviors in the prediction of interviewer effectiveness

AU - Nagata, Donna K.

AU - Nay, W. Robert

AU - Seidman, Edward

PY - 1983/1

Y1 - 1983/1

N2 - Assessed the ecological validity of previous research (e.g., M. B. LaCrosse, 1975; J. R. Graves and J. D. Robinson, 1976) that has suggested that an interviewer's nonverbal behaviors predominate over verbal content in the prediction of interviewer effectiveness ratings. In contrast to earlier investigations, the current study assessed naturally occurring rather than manipulated interviewer behavior and used "client" ratings of effectiveness rather than observer ratings. Data were collected from analog interviews conducted by 40 counseling students with 80 undergraduates. Results indicate that nonverbal interviewer behaviors do not clearly predominate over verbal content behaviors in the prediction of effectiveness ratings. It is suggested that earlier findings of nonverbal superiority are not generalizable to more ecologically valid interview settings. (9 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Assessed the ecological validity of previous research (e.g., M. B. LaCrosse, 1975; J. R. Graves and J. D. Robinson, 1976) that has suggested that an interviewer's nonverbal behaviors predominate over verbal content in the prediction of interviewer effectiveness ratings. In contrast to earlier investigations, the current study assessed naturally occurring rather than manipulated interviewer behavior and used "client" ratings of effectiveness rather than observer ratings. Data were collected from analog interviews conducted by 40 counseling students with 80 undergraduates. Results indicate that nonverbal interviewer behaviors do not clearly predominate over verbal content behaviors in the prediction of effectiveness ratings. It is suggested that earlier findings of nonverbal superiority are not generalizable to more ecologically valid interview settings. (9 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - nonverbal behavior vs verbal content of interviews, prediction of ratings of interviewer effectiveness, college students

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149368466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149368466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037//0022-0167.30.1.83

DO - 10.1037//0022-0167.30.1.83

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:58149368466

VL - 30

SP - 83

EP - 86

JO - Journal of Counseling Psychology

JF - Journal of Counseling Psychology

SN - 0022-0167

IS - 1

ER -