Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups

John Jost, Brett W. Pelham, Mauricio R. Carvallo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

According to system justification theory, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, even though it sometimes means harboring preferences for members of higher status outgroups. In Study 1, students from a high status (but not a low status) university exhibited significant ingroup favoritism on the IAT, an automatic evaluative measure. Furthermore, for students at the high status university, implicit ingroup bias was positively correlated with implicit self-esteem. For students at the low status university, implicit acceptance of consensual stereotypes concerning academic and extracurricular characteristics was associated with implicit outgroup favoritism. In Study 2, Latinos and Asian Americans exhibited significant outgroup favoritism on an unobtrusive behavioral measure by choosing White interaction partners over members of their own groups. In Study 3, parents named newborn children disproportionately after their fathers (compared with their mothers) and published birth announcements for boys slightly more often than for girls. Thus, we observed evidence of system justification on implicit or unobtrusive measures in three different socially disadvantaged groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)586-602
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2002

Fingerprint

status group
outgroup
Students
university
Asian Americans
student
Vulnerable Populations
system theory
Hispanic Americans
Self Concept
Fathers
self-esteem
stereotype
father
parents
Group
acceptance
Parents
Mothers
Parturition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Non-conscious forms of system justification : Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. / Jost, John; Pelham, Brett W.; Carvallo, Mauricio R.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 38, No. 6, 11.2002, p. 586-602.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b3cb28735f434463b4a41c3bb5b6a5bc,
title = "Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups",
abstract = "According to system justification theory, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, even though it sometimes means harboring preferences for members of higher status outgroups. In Study 1, students from a high status (but not a low status) university exhibited significant ingroup favoritism on the IAT, an automatic evaluative measure. Furthermore, for students at the high status university, implicit ingroup bias was positively correlated with implicit self-esteem. For students at the low status university, implicit acceptance of consensual stereotypes concerning academic and extracurricular characteristics was associated with implicit outgroup favoritism. In Study 2, Latinos and Asian Americans exhibited significant outgroup favoritism on an unobtrusive behavioral measure by choosing White interaction partners over members of their own groups. In Study 3, parents named newborn children disproportionately after their fathers (compared with their mothers) and published birth announcements for boys slightly more often than for girls. Thus, we observed evidence of system justification on implicit or unobtrusive measures in three different socially disadvantaged groups.",
author = "John Jost and Pelham, {Brett W.} and Carvallo, {Mauricio R.}",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "586--602",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-conscious forms of system justification

T2 - Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups

AU - Jost, John

AU - Pelham, Brett W.

AU - Carvallo, Mauricio R.

PY - 2002/11

Y1 - 2002/11

N2 - According to system justification theory, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, even though it sometimes means harboring preferences for members of higher status outgroups. In Study 1, students from a high status (but not a low status) university exhibited significant ingroup favoritism on the IAT, an automatic evaluative measure. Furthermore, for students at the high status university, implicit ingroup bias was positively correlated with implicit self-esteem. For students at the low status university, implicit acceptance of consensual stereotypes concerning academic and extracurricular characteristics was associated with implicit outgroup favoritism. In Study 2, Latinos and Asian Americans exhibited significant outgroup favoritism on an unobtrusive behavioral measure by choosing White interaction partners over members of their own groups. In Study 3, parents named newborn children disproportionately after their fathers (compared with their mothers) and published birth announcements for boys slightly more often than for girls. Thus, we observed evidence of system justification on implicit or unobtrusive measures in three different socially disadvantaged groups.

AB - According to system justification theory, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, even though it sometimes means harboring preferences for members of higher status outgroups. In Study 1, students from a high status (but not a low status) university exhibited significant ingroup favoritism on the IAT, an automatic evaluative measure. Furthermore, for students at the high status university, implicit ingroup bias was positively correlated with implicit self-esteem. For students at the low status university, implicit acceptance of consensual stereotypes concerning academic and extracurricular characteristics was associated with implicit outgroup favoritism. In Study 2, Latinos and Asian Americans exhibited significant outgroup favoritism on an unobtrusive behavioral measure by choosing White interaction partners over members of their own groups. In Study 3, parents named newborn children disproportionately after their fathers (compared with their mothers) and published birth announcements for boys slightly more often than for girls. Thus, we observed evidence of system justification on implicit or unobtrusive measures in three different socially disadvantaged groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036873425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036873425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X

DO - 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036873425

VL - 38

SP - 586

EP - 602

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

IS - 6

ER -