Noise masking reveals channels for second-order letters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We investigate the channels underlying identification of second-order letters using a critical-band masking paradigm. We find that observers use a single 1-1.5 octave-wide channel for this task. This channel's best spatial frequency (c/letter) did not change across different noise conditions (indicating the inability of observers to switch channels to improve signal-to-noise ratio) or across different letter sizes (indicating scale invariance), for a fixed carrier frequency (c/letter). However, the channel's best spatial frequency does change with stimulus carrier frequency (both in c/letter); one is proportional to the other. Following Majaj et al. (Majaj, N. J., Pelli, D. G., Kurshan, P., & Palomares, M. (2002). The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification. Vision Research, 42, 1165-1184), we define "stroke frequency" as the line frequency (strokes/deg) in the luminance image. That is, for luminance-defined letters, stroke frequency is the number of lines (strokes) across each letter divided by letter width. For second-order letters, letter texture stroke frequency is the number of carrier cycles (luminance lines) within the letter ink area divided by the letter width. Unlike the nonlinear dependence found for first-order letters (implying scale-dependent processing), for second-order letters the channel frequency is half the letter texture stroke frequency (suggesting scale-invariant processing).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1493-1506
Number of pages14
JournalVision Research
Volume46
Issue number8-9
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Noise
Stroke
Ink
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Research

Keywords

  • Channel switching
  • Critical-band masking
  • Letter identification
  • Scale invariance
  • Second-order vision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Noise masking reveals channels for second-order letters. / Oruç, Ipek; Landy, Michael S.; Pelli, Denis G.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 46, No. 8-9, 04.2006, p. 1493-1506.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7d3e856c030c42fbaaf2737218658278,
title = "Noise masking reveals channels for second-order letters",
abstract = "We investigate the channels underlying identification of second-order letters using a critical-band masking paradigm. We find that observers use a single 1-1.5 octave-wide channel for this task. This channel's best spatial frequency (c/letter) did not change across different noise conditions (indicating the inability of observers to switch channels to improve signal-to-noise ratio) or across different letter sizes (indicating scale invariance), for a fixed carrier frequency (c/letter). However, the channel's best spatial frequency does change with stimulus carrier frequency (both in c/letter); one is proportional to the other. Following Majaj et al. (Majaj, N. J., Pelli, D. G., Kurshan, P., & Palomares, M. (2002). The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification. Vision Research, 42, 1165-1184), we define {"}stroke frequency{"} as the line frequency (strokes/deg) in the luminance image. That is, for luminance-defined letters, stroke frequency is the number of lines (strokes) across each letter divided by letter width. For second-order letters, letter texture stroke frequency is the number of carrier cycles (luminance lines) within the letter ink area divided by the letter width. Unlike the nonlinear dependence found for first-order letters (implying scale-dependent processing), for second-order letters the channel frequency is half the letter texture stroke frequency (suggesting scale-invariant processing).",
keywords = "Channel switching, Critical-band masking, Letter identification, Scale invariance, Second-order vision",
author = "Ipek Oru{\cc} and Landy, {Michael S.} and Pelli, {Denis G.}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "1493--1506",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "8-9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Noise masking reveals channels for second-order letters

AU - Oruç, Ipek

AU - Landy, Michael S.

AU - Pelli, Denis G.

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - We investigate the channels underlying identification of second-order letters using a critical-band masking paradigm. We find that observers use a single 1-1.5 octave-wide channel for this task. This channel's best spatial frequency (c/letter) did not change across different noise conditions (indicating the inability of observers to switch channels to improve signal-to-noise ratio) or across different letter sizes (indicating scale invariance), for a fixed carrier frequency (c/letter). However, the channel's best spatial frequency does change with stimulus carrier frequency (both in c/letter); one is proportional to the other. Following Majaj et al. (Majaj, N. J., Pelli, D. G., Kurshan, P., & Palomares, M. (2002). The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification. Vision Research, 42, 1165-1184), we define "stroke frequency" as the line frequency (strokes/deg) in the luminance image. That is, for luminance-defined letters, stroke frequency is the number of lines (strokes) across each letter divided by letter width. For second-order letters, letter texture stroke frequency is the number of carrier cycles (luminance lines) within the letter ink area divided by the letter width. Unlike the nonlinear dependence found for first-order letters (implying scale-dependent processing), for second-order letters the channel frequency is half the letter texture stroke frequency (suggesting scale-invariant processing).

AB - We investigate the channels underlying identification of second-order letters using a critical-band masking paradigm. We find that observers use a single 1-1.5 octave-wide channel for this task. This channel's best spatial frequency (c/letter) did not change across different noise conditions (indicating the inability of observers to switch channels to improve signal-to-noise ratio) or across different letter sizes (indicating scale invariance), for a fixed carrier frequency (c/letter). However, the channel's best spatial frequency does change with stimulus carrier frequency (both in c/letter); one is proportional to the other. Following Majaj et al. (Majaj, N. J., Pelli, D. G., Kurshan, P., & Palomares, M. (2002). The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification. Vision Research, 42, 1165-1184), we define "stroke frequency" as the line frequency (strokes/deg) in the luminance image. That is, for luminance-defined letters, stroke frequency is the number of lines (strokes) across each letter divided by letter width. For second-order letters, letter texture stroke frequency is the number of carrier cycles (luminance lines) within the letter ink area divided by the letter width. Unlike the nonlinear dependence found for first-order letters (implying scale-dependent processing), for second-order letters the channel frequency is half the letter texture stroke frequency (suggesting scale-invariant processing).

KW - Channel switching

KW - Critical-band masking

KW - Letter identification

KW - Scale invariance

KW - Second-order vision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30444433578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30444433578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.016

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 16203023

AN - SCOPUS:30444433578

VL - 46

SP - 1493

EP - 1506

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 8-9

ER -