Next-generation bioimaging systems

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The question I would like to help answer is: What is the role and what, can imaging do for systems biology? In recent years, the focus in biological sciences has shifted from understanding single parts of larger systems, sort of vertical approach, to understanding complex systems at the cellular and molecular levels, horizontal approach. Thus the revolution of "omics" projects, genomics and now proteomics. Understanding complexity of biological systems is a task that requires acquisition, analysis and sharing of huge databases, and in particular, high-dimensional databases. For example, in the current project on location proteomics, the fluorescence microscopy data sets can have a dimension as high as 5: two spatial dimensions, z-stacks, time series and different-color channels (different, color probes for different proteins). Processing such huge amount of bioimages visually by biologists is inefficient, time-consuming and error-prone. Therefore, we would like to move towards automated, efficient and robust processing of such bioimage data sets. Moreover, some information hidden in the images may not be readily visually available. For example, in the same project, we use images of two proteins residing in the Golgi apparatus-giantin and gpp130. These two proteins cannot be distinguished better than randomly by humans, while when employing data mining methods, they can be told apart. Therefore, we do not only replace humans by machines for faster and more efficient processing but also because new knowledge is generated through use of sophisticated algorithms. The ultimate dream is to have distributed yet integrated large bioimage databases which would allow researchers to upload their data, have it processed, share the data, download data as well as platform-optimized code, etc, and all this in a common format, something akin to the DICOM format for clinical imaging. To achieve this goal, we must draw upon a whole host of sophisticated tools from signal, processing, machine learning and scientific computing. While such tools are widely present in clinical (medical) imaging, they are not as widespread in imaging of biological systems at cellular and molecular levels. This is a huge challenge and requires integration of interdisciplinary teams. I will address some of these issues in this presentation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium, NORSIG 2006
Number of pages1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007
Event7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium, NORSIG 2006 - Reykjavik, Iceland
Duration: Jun 7 2006Jun 9 2006

Other

Other7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium, NORSIG 2006
CountryIceland
CityReykjavik
Period6/7/066/9/06

Fingerprint

Medical imaging
Biological systems
Proteins
Processing
Color
Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM)
Proteomics
Imaging
Imaging techniques
Natural sciences computing
Protein
Biological Systems
Fluorescence microscopy
Data mining
Learning systems
Large scale systems
DICOM
Time series
Signal processing
Fluorescence Microscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Signal Processing
  • Mathematics(all)

Cite this

Kovacevic, J. (2007). Next-generation bioimaging systems. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium, NORSIG 2006 [4052266] https://doi.org/10.1109/NORSIG.2006.275271

Next-generation bioimaging systems. / Kovacevic, Jelena.

Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium, NORSIG 2006. 2007. 4052266.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Kovacevic, J 2007, Next-generation bioimaging systems. in Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium, NORSIG 2006., 4052266, 7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium, NORSIG 2006, Reykjavik, Iceland, 6/7/06. https://doi.org/10.1109/NORSIG.2006.275271
Kovacevic J. Next-generation bioimaging systems. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium, NORSIG 2006. 2007. 4052266 https://doi.org/10.1109/NORSIG.2006.275271
Kovacevic, Jelena. / Next-generation bioimaging systems. Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium, NORSIG 2006. 2007.
@inproceedings{49e5de3b9ecf48bb9038d54bb40b920e,
title = "Next-generation bioimaging systems",
abstract = "The question I would like to help answer is: What is the role and what, can imaging do for systems biology? In recent years, the focus in biological sciences has shifted from understanding single parts of larger systems, sort of vertical approach, to understanding complex systems at the cellular and molecular levels, horizontal approach. Thus the revolution of {"}omics{"} projects, genomics and now proteomics. Understanding complexity of biological systems is a task that requires acquisition, analysis and sharing of huge databases, and in particular, high-dimensional databases. For example, in the current project on location proteomics, the fluorescence microscopy data sets can have a dimension as high as 5: two spatial dimensions, z-stacks, time series and different-color channels (different, color probes for different proteins). Processing such huge amount of bioimages visually by biologists is inefficient, time-consuming and error-prone. Therefore, we would like to move towards automated, efficient and robust processing of such bioimage data sets. Moreover, some information hidden in the images may not be readily visually available. For example, in the same project, we use images of two proteins residing in the Golgi apparatus-giantin and gpp130. These two proteins cannot be distinguished better than randomly by humans, while when employing data mining methods, they can be told apart. Therefore, we do not only replace humans by machines for faster and more efficient processing but also because new knowledge is generated through use of sophisticated algorithms. The ultimate dream is to have distributed yet integrated large bioimage databases which would allow researchers to upload their data, have it processed, share the data, download data as well as platform-optimized code, etc, and all this in a common format, something akin to the DICOM format for clinical imaging. To achieve this goal, we must draw upon a whole host of sophisticated tools from signal, processing, machine learning and scientific computing. While such tools are widely present in clinical (medical) imaging, they are not as widespread in imaging of biological systems at cellular and molecular levels. This is a huge challenge and requires integration of interdisciplinary teams. I will address some of these issues in this presentation.",
author = "Jelena Kovacevic",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/NORSIG.2006.275271",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "1424404126",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium, NORSIG 2006",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Next-generation bioimaging systems

AU - Kovacevic, Jelena

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - The question I would like to help answer is: What is the role and what, can imaging do for systems biology? In recent years, the focus in biological sciences has shifted from understanding single parts of larger systems, sort of vertical approach, to understanding complex systems at the cellular and molecular levels, horizontal approach. Thus the revolution of "omics" projects, genomics and now proteomics. Understanding complexity of biological systems is a task that requires acquisition, analysis and sharing of huge databases, and in particular, high-dimensional databases. For example, in the current project on location proteomics, the fluorescence microscopy data sets can have a dimension as high as 5: two spatial dimensions, z-stacks, time series and different-color channels (different, color probes for different proteins). Processing such huge amount of bioimages visually by biologists is inefficient, time-consuming and error-prone. Therefore, we would like to move towards automated, efficient and robust processing of such bioimage data sets. Moreover, some information hidden in the images may not be readily visually available. For example, in the same project, we use images of two proteins residing in the Golgi apparatus-giantin and gpp130. These two proteins cannot be distinguished better than randomly by humans, while when employing data mining methods, they can be told apart. Therefore, we do not only replace humans by machines for faster and more efficient processing but also because new knowledge is generated through use of sophisticated algorithms. The ultimate dream is to have distributed yet integrated large bioimage databases which would allow researchers to upload their data, have it processed, share the data, download data as well as platform-optimized code, etc, and all this in a common format, something akin to the DICOM format for clinical imaging. To achieve this goal, we must draw upon a whole host of sophisticated tools from signal, processing, machine learning and scientific computing. While such tools are widely present in clinical (medical) imaging, they are not as widespread in imaging of biological systems at cellular and molecular levels. This is a huge challenge and requires integration of interdisciplinary teams. I will address some of these issues in this presentation.

AB - The question I would like to help answer is: What is the role and what, can imaging do for systems biology? In recent years, the focus in biological sciences has shifted from understanding single parts of larger systems, sort of vertical approach, to understanding complex systems at the cellular and molecular levels, horizontal approach. Thus the revolution of "omics" projects, genomics and now proteomics. Understanding complexity of biological systems is a task that requires acquisition, analysis and sharing of huge databases, and in particular, high-dimensional databases. For example, in the current project on location proteomics, the fluorescence microscopy data sets can have a dimension as high as 5: two spatial dimensions, z-stacks, time series and different-color channels (different, color probes for different proteins). Processing such huge amount of bioimages visually by biologists is inefficient, time-consuming and error-prone. Therefore, we would like to move towards automated, efficient and robust processing of such bioimage data sets. Moreover, some information hidden in the images may not be readily visually available. For example, in the same project, we use images of two proteins residing in the Golgi apparatus-giantin and gpp130. These two proteins cannot be distinguished better than randomly by humans, while when employing data mining methods, they can be told apart. Therefore, we do not only replace humans by machines for faster and more efficient processing but also because new knowledge is generated through use of sophisticated algorithms. The ultimate dream is to have distributed yet integrated large bioimage databases which would allow researchers to upload their data, have it processed, share the data, download data as well as platform-optimized code, etc, and all this in a common format, something akin to the DICOM format for clinical imaging. To achieve this goal, we must draw upon a whole host of sophisticated tools from signal, processing, machine learning and scientific computing. While such tools are widely present in clinical (medical) imaging, they are not as widespread in imaging of biological systems at cellular and molecular levels. This is a huge challenge and requires integration of interdisciplinary teams. I will address some of these issues in this presentation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39049083951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39049083951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/NORSIG.2006.275271

DO - 10.1109/NORSIG.2006.275271

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:39049083951

SN - 1424404126

SN - 9781424404124

BT - Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium, NORSIG 2006

ER -