New vocabularies in film semiotics

Structuralism, post-structuralism and beyond

Robert Stam, Robert Burgoyne, Sandy Flitterman-Lewis

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

    Abstract

    The founding premise of this text is that film semiotics has constituted one of the signal advances in arts criticism in recent years. Ever since film theory broke free from the impressionistic debate about auteurism and "realism" which had dominated film-critical discourse through the early 1960s, film semiotics and its developments have been at the center of the analytic enterprise in film. In a first stage, Saussurean structural linguistics provided the dominant theoretical model, followed by a second phase in which Althusserian Marxism and Lacanian psychoanalysis became the preferred conceptual grids, followed in turn by a more pluralistic period in which movements such as feminism, already a formative presence in film studies, both incorporated and critiqued the antecedent theories and schools. Although post-structuralism "buried" the scientistic dreams of early structuralist semiology, currently semiotics, conceived in a broad sense, continues to form the matrix, and provide much of the vocabulary, for approaches ranging from the linguistic, psychoanalytic, feminist and Marxist to the narratological, reception-oriented and translinguistic. Although film semiotics has partially retreated from its earlier totalizing claims, what Guy Gauthier calls the "semiotic diaspora" remains a dynamizing presence within reflexion on film.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    PublisherTaylor and Francis Inc.
    Number of pages246
    ISBN (Electronic)9781134963171
    ISBN (Print)9780203977194
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 8 2005

    Fingerprint

    post-structuralism
    structuralism
    semiotics
    vocabulary
    art criticism
    linguistics
    Marxism
    psychoanalytic theory
    diaspora
    realism
    feminism
    discourse

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Stam, R., Burgoyne, R., & Flitterman-Lewis, S. (2005). New vocabularies in film semiotics: Structuralism, post-structuralism and beyond. Taylor and Francis Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203977194

    New vocabularies in film semiotics : Structuralism, post-structuralism and beyond. / Stam, Robert; Burgoyne, Robert; Flitterman-Lewis, Sandy.

    Taylor and Francis Inc., 2005. 246 p.

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

    Stam R, Burgoyne R, Flitterman-Lewis S. New vocabularies in film semiotics: Structuralism, post-structuralism and beyond. Taylor and Francis Inc., 2005. 246 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203977194
    Stam, Robert ; Burgoyne, Robert ; Flitterman-Lewis, Sandy. / New vocabularies in film semiotics : Structuralism, post-structuralism and beyond. Taylor and Francis Inc., 2005. 246 p.
    @book{bbe4dc278fe64a61b69aa5e2dad26109,
    title = "New vocabularies in film semiotics: Structuralism, post-structuralism and beyond",
    abstract = "The founding premise of this text is that film semiotics has constituted one of the signal advances in arts criticism in recent years. Ever since film theory broke free from the impressionistic debate about auteurism and {"}realism{"} which had dominated film-critical discourse through the early 1960s, film semiotics and its developments have been at the center of the analytic enterprise in film. In a first stage, Saussurean structural linguistics provided the dominant theoretical model, followed by a second phase in which Althusserian Marxism and Lacanian psychoanalysis became the preferred conceptual grids, followed in turn by a more pluralistic period in which movements such as feminism, already a formative presence in film studies, both incorporated and critiqued the antecedent theories and schools. Although post-structuralism {"}buried{"} the scientistic dreams of early structuralist semiology, currently semiotics, conceived in a broad sense, continues to form the matrix, and provide much of the vocabulary, for approaches ranging from the linguistic, psychoanalytic, feminist and Marxist to the narratological, reception-oriented and translinguistic. Although film semiotics has partially retreated from its earlier totalizing claims, what Guy Gauthier calls the {"}semiotic diaspora{"} remains a dynamizing presence within reflexion on film.",
    author = "Robert Stam and Robert Burgoyne and Sandy Flitterman-Lewis",
    year = "2005",
    month = "7",
    day = "8",
    doi = "10.4324/9780203977194",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "9780203977194",
    publisher = "Taylor and Francis Inc.",

    }

    TY - BOOK

    T1 - New vocabularies in film semiotics

    T2 - Structuralism, post-structuralism and beyond

    AU - Stam, Robert

    AU - Burgoyne, Robert

    AU - Flitterman-Lewis, Sandy

    PY - 2005/7/8

    Y1 - 2005/7/8

    N2 - The founding premise of this text is that film semiotics has constituted one of the signal advances in arts criticism in recent years. Ever since film theory broke free from the impressionistic debate about auteurism and "realism" which had dominated film-critical discourse through the early 1960s, film semiotics and its developments have been at the center of the analytic enterprise in film. In a first stage, Saussurean structural linguistics provided the dominant theoretical model, followed by a second phase in which Althusserian Marxism and Lacanian psychoanalysis became the preferred conceptual grids, followed in turn by a more pluralistic period in which movements such as feminism, already a formative presence in film studies, both incorporated and critiqued the antecedent theories and schools. Although post-structuralism "buried" the scientistic dreams of early structuralist semiology, currently semiotics, conceived in a broad sense, continues to form the matrix, and provide much of the vocabulary, for approaches ranging from the linguistic, psychoanalytic, feminist and Marxist to the narratological, reception-oriented and translinguistic. Although film semiotics has partially retreated from its earlier totalizing claims, what Guy Gauthier calls the "semiotic diaspora" remains a dynamizing presence within reflexion on film.

    AB - The founding premise of this text is that film semiotics has constituted one of the signal advances in arts criticism in recent years. Ever since film theory broke free from the impressionistic debate about auteurism and "realism" which had dominated film-critical discourse through the early 1960s, film semiotics and its developments have been at the center of the analytic enterprise in film. In a first stage, Saussurean structural linguistics provided the dominant theoretical model, followed by a second phase in which Althusserian Marxism and Lacanian psychoanalysis became the preferred conceptual grids, followed in turn by a more pluralistic period in which movements such as feminism, already a formative presence in film studies, both incorporated and critiqued the antecedent theories and schools. Although post-structuralism "buried" the scientistic dreams of early structuralist semiology, currently semiotics, conceived in a broad sense, continues to form the matrix, and provide much of the vocabulary, for approaches ranging from the linguistic, psychoanalytic, feminist and Marxist to the narratological, reception-oriented and translinguistic. Although film semiotics has partially retreated from its earlier totalizing claims, what Guy Gauthier calls the "semiotic diaspora" remains a dynamizing presence within reflexion on film.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066774807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066774807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.4324/9780203977194

    DO - 10.4324/9780203977194

    M3 - Book

    SN - 9780203977194

    BT - New vocabularies in film semiotics

    PB - Taylor and Francis Inc.

    ER -