New injectors and the social context of injection initiation

Alex Harocopos, Lloyd Goldsamt, Paul Kobrak, John J. Jost, Michael C. Clatts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Preventing the onset of injecting drug use is an important public health objective yet there is little understanding of the process that leads to injection initiation. This paper draws extensively on narrative data to describe how injection initiation is influenced by social environment. We examine how watching other people inject can habitualise non-injectors to administering drugs with a needle and consider the process by which the stigma of injecting is replaced with curiosity. Method: In-depth interviews (n = 54) were conducted as part of a 2-year longitudinal study examining the behaviours of new injecting drug users. Results: Among our sample, injection initiation was the result of a dynamic process during which administering drugs with a needle became acceptable or even appealing. Most often, this occurred as a result of spending time with current injectors in a social context and the majority of this study's participants were given their first shot by a friend or sexual partner. Initiates could be tenacious in their efforts to acquire an injection trainer and findings suggest that once injecting had been introduced to a drug-using network, it was likely to spread throughout the group. Conclusion: Injection initiation should be viewed as a communicable process. New injectors are unlikely to have experienced the negative effects of injecting and may facilitate the initiation of their drug-using friends. Prevention messages should therefore aim to find innovative ways of targeting beginning injectors and present a realistic appraisal of the long-term consequences of injecting. Interventionists should also work with current injectors to develop strategies to refuse requests from non-injectors for their help to initiate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)317-323
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Drug Policy
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009

Fingerprint

Injections
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Needles
Exploratory Behavior
Social Environment
Sexual Partners
Drug Users
Longitudinal Studies
Public Health
Interviews

Keywords

  • Initiation
  • Injecting drug use
  • Narratives
  • Social setting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

New injectors and the social context of injection initiation. / Harocopos, Alex; Goldsamt, Lloyd; Kobrak, Paul; Jost, John J.; Clatts, Michael C.

In: International Journal of Drug Policy, Vol. 20, No. 4, 07.2009, p. 317-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harocopos, Alex ; Goldsamt, Lloyd ; Kobrak, Paul ; Jost, John J. ; Clatts, Michael C. / New injectors and the social context of injection initiation. In: International Journal of Drug Policy. 2009 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 317-323.
@article{60dc8574a447415490ffe2c35f9ad7f6,
title = "New injectors and the social context of injection initiation",
abstract = "Background: Preventing the onset of injecting drug use is an important public health objective yet there is little understanding of the process that leads to injection initiation. This paper draws extensively on narrative data to describe how injection initiation is influenced by social environment. We examine how watching other people inject can habitualise non-injectors to administering drugs with a needle and consider the process by which the stigma of injecting is replaced with curiosity. Method: In-depth interviews (n = 54) were conducted as part of a 2-year longitudinal study examining the behaviours of new injecting drug users. Results: Among our sample, injection initiation was the result of a dynamic process during which administering drugs with a needle became acceptable or even appealing. Most often, this occurred as a result of spending time with current injectors in a social context and the majority of this study's participants were given their first shot by a friend or sexual partner. Initiates could be tenacious in their efforts to acquire an injection trainer and findings suggest that once injecting had been introduced to a drug-using network, it was likely to spread throughout the group. Conclusion: Injection initiation should be viewed as a communicable process. New injectors are unlikely to have experienced the negative effects of injecting and may facilitate the initiation of their drug-using friends. Prevention messages should therefore aim to find innovative ways of targeting beginning injectors and present a realistic appraisal of the long-term consequences of injecting. Interventionists should also work with current injectors to develop strategies to refuse requests from non-injectors for their help to initiate.",
keywords = "Initiation, Injecting drug use, Narratives, Social setting",
author = "Alex Harocopos and Lloyd Goldsamt and Paul Kobrak and Jost, {John J.} and Clatts, {Michael C.}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.06.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "317--323",
journal = "International Journal of Drug Policy",
issn = "0955-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - New injectors and the social context of injection initiation

AU - Harocopos, Alex

AU - Goldsamt, Lloyd

AU - Kobrak, Paul

AU - Jost, John J.

AU - Clatts, Michael C.

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Background: Preventing the onset of injecting drug use is an important public health objective yet there is little understanding of the process that leads to injection initiation. This paper draws extensively on narrative data to describe how injection initiation is influenced by social environment. We examine how watching other people inject can habitualise non-injectors to administering drugs with a needle and consider the process by which the stigma of injecting is replaced with curiosity. Method: In-depth interviews (n = 54) were conducted as part of a 2-year longitudinal study examining the behaviours of new injecting drug users. Results: Among our sample, injection initiation was the result of a dynamic process during which administering drugs with a needle became acceptable or even appealing. Most often, this occurred as a result of spending time with current injectors in a social context and the majority of this study's participants were given their first shot by a friend or sexual partner. Initiates could be tenacious in their efforts to acquire an injection trainer and findings suggest that once injecting had been introduced to a drug-using network, it was likely to spread throughout the group. Conclusion: Injection initiation should be viewed as a communicable process. New injectors are unlikely to have experienced the negative effects of injecting and may facilitate the initiation of their drug-using friends. Prevention messages should therefore aim to find innovative ways of targeting beginning injectors and present a realistic appraisal of the long-term consequences of injecting. Interventionists should also work with current injectors to develop strategies to refuse requests from non-injectors for their help to initiate.

AB - Background: Preventing the onset of injecting drug use is an important public health objective yet there is little understanding of the process that leads to injection initiation. This paper draws extensively on narrative data to describe how injection initiation is influenced by social environment. We examine how watching other people inject can habitualise non-injectors to administering drugs with a needle and consider the process by which the stigma of injecting is replaced with curiosity. Method: In-depth interviews (n = 54) were conducted as part of a 2-year longitudinal study examining the behaviours of new injecting drug users. Results: Among our sample, injection initiation was the result of a dynamic process during which administering drugs with a needle became acceptable or even appealing. Most often, this occurred as a result of spending time with current injectors in a social context and the majority of this study's participants were given their first shot by a friend or sexual partner. Initiates could be tenacious in their efforts to acquire an injection trainer and findings suggest that once injecting had been introduced to a drug-using network, it was likely to spread throughout the group. Conclusion: Injection initiation should be viewed as a communicable process. New injectors are unlikely to have experienced the negative effects of injecting and may facilitate the initiation of their drug-using friends. Prevention messages should therefore aim to find innovative ways of targeting beginning injectors and present a realistic appraisal of the long-term consequences of injecting. Interventionists should also work with current injectors to develop strategies to refuse requests from non-injectors for their help to initiate.

KW - Initiation

KW - Injecting drug use

KW - Narratives

KW - Social setting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66749125032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66749125032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.06.003

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 317

EP - 323

JO - International Journal of Drug Policy

JF - International Journal of Drug Policy

SN - 0955-3959

IS - 4

ER -