Neuroscientific insights: Attention, working memory, and inhibitory control

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

In this article, Cybele Raver and Clancy Blair explore a group of cognitive processes called executive function (EF)-including the flexible control of attention, the ability to hold information through working memory, and the ability to maintain inhibitory control EF processes are crucial for young children’s learning. On the one hand, they can helpstudents control their anxiety when they face challenging academic tasks. On the other, these same processes can be undermined when children experience chronically stressful situations-for example, poverty, homelessness, and neighborhood crime. Such adverse early experiences interfere with children’s development of EF, hampering their ability to manage challenging situations Through both behavioral examples and empirical evidence, Raver and Blair illustrate how children’s cognitive development is intertwined with EF. They show how children’s regulation of higher-order thinking is related to the regulation of emotion-in both top-down and bottom-up fashion-and they review research on early brain development, EF and emotion regulation, and children’s academic performance. They also examine the efficacy of educational interventions that target EF and of integrated interventions that target both emotional and cognitive regulation. What does our understanding of EF imply for policy in pre-K-3 education? First, write Raver and Blair, to help young children learn, school districts need data not only on their academic readiness but also on key dimensions of EF. Second, we already have interventions that can at least partially close the gap in neurocognitive function and academic achievement between children who face multiple types of adversity and those who don’t. In the long run, though, they argue, the best way to help these children is to invest in programs that reduce their exposure to chronic severe stress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-118
Number of pages24
JournalFuture of Children
Volume26
Issue number2
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Executive Function
Short-Term Memory
Aptitude
Emotions
ability
emotion
Homeless Persons
Group Processes
regulation
Crime
Poverty
cognitive development
homelessness
academic achievement
Anxiety
brain
Learning
experience
Education
offense

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Neuroscientific insights : Attention, working memory, and inhibitory control. / Cybele Raver, C.; Blair, Clancy.

In: Future of Children, Vol. 26, No. 2, 01.09.2016, p. 95-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{2c76643d56e4479baf8edc2d6a0c9738,
title = "Neuroscientific insights: Attention, working memory, and inhibitory control",
abstract = "In this article, Cybele Raver and Clancy Blair explore a group of cognitive processes called executive function (EF)-including the flexible control of attention, the ability to hold information through working memory, and the ability to maintain inhibitory control EF processes are crucial for young children’s learning. On the one hand, they can helpstudents control their anxiety when they face challenging academic tasks. On the other, these same processes can be undermined when children experience chronically stressful situations-for example, poverty, homelessness, and neighborhood crime. Such adverse early experiences interfere with children’s development of EF, hampering their ability to manage challenging situations Through both behavioral examples and empirical evidence, Raver and Blair illustrate how children’s cognitive development is intertwined with EF. They show how children’s regulation of higher-order thinking is related to the regulation of emotion-in both top-down and bottom-up fashion-and they review research on early brain development, EF and emotion regulation, and children’s academic performance. They also examine the efficacy of educational interventions that target EF and of integrated interventions that target both emotional and cognitive regulation. What does our understanding of EF imply for policy in pre-K-3 education? First, write Raver and Blair, to help young children learn, school districts need data not only on their academic readiness but also on key dimensions of EF. Second, we already have interventions that can at least partially close the gap in neurocognitive function and academic achievement between children who face multiple types of adversity and those who don’t. In the long run, though, they argue, the best way to help these children is to invest in programs that reduce their exposure to chronic severe stress.",
author = "{Cybele Raver}, C. and Clancy Blair",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "95--118",
journal = "Future of Children",
issn = "1054-8289",
publisher = "Center for the Future of Children",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neuroscientific insights

T2 - Attention, working memory, and inhibitory control

AU - Cybele Raver, C.

AU - Blair, Clancy

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - In this article, Cybele Raver and Clancy Blair explore a group of cognitive processes called executive function (EF)-including the flexible control of attention, the ability to hold information through working memory, and the ability to maintain inhibitory control EF processes are crucial for young children’s learning. On the one hand, they can helpstudents control their anxiety when they face challenging academic tasks. On the other, these same processes can be undermined when children experience chronically stressful situations-for example, poverty, homelessness, and neighborhood crime. Such adverse early experiences interfere with children’s development of EF, hampering their ability to manage challenging situations Through both behavioral examples and empirical evidence, Raver and Blair illustrate how children’s cognitive development is intertwined with EF. They show how children’s regulation of higher-order thinking is related to the regulation of emotion-in both top-down and bottom-up fashion-and they review research on early brain development, EF and emotion regulation, and children’s academic performance. They also examine the efficacy of educational interventions that target EF and of integrated interventions that target both emotional and cognitive regulation. What does our understanding of EF imply for policy in pre-K-3 education? First, write Raver and Blair, to help young children learn, school districts need data not only on their academic readiness but also on key dimensions of EF. Second, we already have interventions that can at least partially close the gap in neurocognitive function and academic achievement between children who face multiple types of adversity and those who don’t. In the long run, though, they argue, the best way to help these children is to invest in programs that reduce their exposure to chronic severe stress.

AB - In this article, Cybele Raver and Clancy Blair explore a group of cognitive processes called executive function (EF)-including the flexible control of attention, the ability to hold information through working memory, and the ability to maintain inhibitory control EF processes are crucial for young children’s learning. On the one hand, they can helpstudents control their anxiety when they face challenging academic tasks. On the other, these same processes can be undermined when children experience chronically stressful situations-for example, poverty, homelessness, and neighborhood crime. Such adverse early experiences interfere with children’s development of EF, hampering their ability to manage challenging situations Through both behavioral examples and empirical evidence, Raver and Blair illustrate how children’s cognitive development is intertwined with EF. They show how children’s regulation of higher-order thinking is related to the regulation of emotion-in both top-down and bottom-up fashion-and they review research on early brain development, EF and emotion regulation, and children’s academic performance. They also examine the efficacy of educational interventions that target EF and of integrated interventions that target both emotional and cognitive regulation. What does our understanding of EF imply for policy in pre-K-3 education? First, write Raver and Blair, to help young children learn, school districts need data not only on their academic readiness but also on key dimensions of EF. Second, we already have interventions that can at least partially close the gap in neurocognitive function and academic achievement between children who face multiple types of adversity and those who don’t. In the long run, though, they argue, the best way to help these children is to invest in programs that reduce their exposure to chronic severe stress.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992740857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992740857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84992740857

VL - 26

SP - 95

EP - 118

JO - Future of Children

JF - Future of Children

SN - 1054-8289

IS - 2

ER -