Neuronal oscillations and speech perception

Critical-band temporal envelopes are the essence

Oded Ghitza, Anne Lise Giraud, David Poeppel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A recent opinion article (Neural oscillations in speech: do not be enslaved by the envelope. Obleser et al., 2012) questions the validity of a class of speech perception models inspired by the possible role of neuronal oscillations in decoding speech (e.g., Ghitza, 2011; Giraud and Poeppel, 2012). The authors criticize, in particular, what they see as an over-emphasis of the role of temporal speech envelope information, and an over-emphasis of entrainment to the input rhythm while neglecting the role of top-down processes in modulating the entrainment of neuronal oscillations. Here we respond to these arguments, referring to the phenomenological model of Ghitza (2011), taken as a representative of the criticized approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-4
Number of pages4
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Issue numberJAN
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 4 2013

Fingerprint

Speech Perception

Keywords

  • Cascaded neuronal oscillations
  • Critical-band envelopes
  • Hierarchical window structure
  • Intelligibility
  • Syllabic parsing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Neurology
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Neuronal oscillations and speech perception : Critical-band temporal envelopes are the essence. / Ghitza, Oded; Giraud, Anne Lise; Poeppel, David.

In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, No. JAN, 04.01.2013, p. 1-4.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7b32442b65fc4733baf3345124055ecc,
title = "Neuronal oscillations and speech perception: Critical-band temporal envelopes are the essence",
abstract = "A recent opinion article (Neural oscillations in speech: do not be enslaved by the envelope. Obleser et al., 2012) questions the validity of a class of speech perception models inspired by the possible role of neuronal oscillations in decoding speech (e.g., Ghitza, 2011; Giraud and Poeppel, 2012). The authors criticize, in particular, what they see as an over-emphasis of the role of temporal speech envelope information, and an over-emphasis of entrainment to the input rhythm while neglecting the role of top-down processes in modulating the entrainment of neuronal oscillations. Here we respond to these arguments, referring to the phenomenological model of Ghitza (2011), taken as a representative of the criticized approach.",
keywords = "Cascaded neuronal oscillations, Critical-band envelopes, Hierarchical window structure, Intelligibility, Syllabic parsing",
author = "Oded Ghitza and Giraud, {Anne Lise} and David Poeppel",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "4",
doi = "10.3389/fnhum.2012.00340",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--4",
journal = "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5161",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "JAN",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neuronal oscillations and speech perception

T2 - Critical-band temporal envelopes are the essence

AU - Ghitza, Oded

AU - Giraud, Anne Lise

AU - Poeppel, David

PY - 2013/1/4

Y1 - 2013/1/4

N2 - A recent opinion article (Neural oscillations in speech: do not be enslaved by the envelope. Obleser et al., 2012) questions the validity of a class of speech perception models inspired by the possible role of neuronal oscillations in decoding speech (e.g., Ghitza, 2011; Giraud and Poeppel, 2012). The authors criticize, in particular, what they see as an over-emphasis of the role of temporal speech envelope information, and an over-emphasis of entrainment to the input rhythm while neglecting the role of top-down processes in modulating the entrainment of neuronal oscillations. Here we respond to these arguments, referring to the phenomenological model of Ghitza (2011), taken as a representative of the criticized approach.

AB - A recent opinion article (Neural oscillations in speech: do not be enslaved by the envelope. Obleser et al., 2012) questions the validity of a class of speech perception models inspired by the possible role of neuronal oscillations in decoding speech (e.g., Ghitza, 2011; Giraud and Poeppel, 2012). The authors criticize, in particular, what they see as an over-emphasis of the role of temporal speech envelope information, and an over-emphasis of entrainment to the input rhythm while neglecting the role of top-down processes in modulating the entrainment of neuronal oscillations. Here we respond to these arguments, referring to the phenomenological model of Ghitza (2011), taken as a representative of the criticized approach.

KW - Cascaded neuronal oscillations

KW - Critical-band envelopes

KW - Hierarchical window structure

KW - Intelligibility

KW - Syllabic parsing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872120226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872120226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00340

DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00340

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 4

JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5161

IS - JAN

ER -