Neural reactivation reveals mechanisms for updating memory

Brice A. Kuhl, Wilma A. Bainbridge, Marvin M. Chun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Our ability to remember new information is often compromised by competition from prior learning, leading to many instances of forgetting. One of the challenges in studying why these lapses occur and how they can be prevented is that it is methodologically difficult to "see" competition between memories as it occurs. Here, we used multi-voxel pattern analysis of human fMRI data to measure the neural reactivation of both older (competing) and newer (target) memories during individual attempts to retrieve newer memories. Of central interest was the following: (1) whether older memories were reactivated during retrieval of newer memories; (2) how reactivation of older memories related to retrieval performance; and (3) whether neural mechanisms engaged during the encoding of newer memories were predictive of neural competition experienced during retrieval. Our results indicate that older and newer visual memories were often simultaneously reactivated in ventral temporal cortex- even when target memories were successfully retrieved. Importantly, stronger reactivation of older memories was associated with less accurate retrieval of newer memories, slower mnemonic decisions, and increased activity in anterior cingulate cortex. Finally, greater activity in the inferior frontal gyrus during the encoding of newer memories (memory updating) predicted lower competition in ventral temporal cortex during subsequent retrieval. Together, these results provide novel insight into how older memories compete with newer memories and specify neural mechanisms that allow competition to be overcome and memories to be updated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3453-3461
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume32
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 7 2012

Fingerprint

Temporal Lobe
Aptitude
Gyrus Cinguli
Prefrontal Cortex
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Neural reactivation reveals mechanisms for updating memory. / Kuhl, Brice A.; Bainbridge, Wilma A.; Chun, Marvin M.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 32, No. 10, 07.03.2012, p. 3453-3461.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kuhl, Brice A. ; Bainbridge, Wilma A. ; Chun, Marvin M. / Neural reactivation reveals mechanisms for updating memory. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 2012 ; Vol. 32, No. 10. pp. 3453-3461.
@article{f8d139b40877424db4b1c6da3a857d28,
title = "Neural reactivation reveals mechanisms for updating memory",
abstract = "Our ability to remember new information is often compromised by competition from prior learning, leading to many instances of forgetting. One of the challenges in studying why these lapses occur and how they can be prevented is that it is methodologically difficult to {"}see{"} competition between memories as it occurs. Here, we used multi-voxel pattern analysis of human fMRI data to measure the neural reactivation of both older (competing) and newer (target) memories during individual attempts to retrieve newer memories. Of central interest was the following: (1) whether older memories were reactivated during retrieval of newer memories; (2) how reactivation of older memories related to retrieval performance; and (3) whether neural mechanisms engaged during the encoding of newer memories were predictive of neural competition experienced during retrieval. Our results indicate that older and newer visual memories were often simultaneously reactivated in ventral temporal cortex- even when target memories were successfully retrieved. Importantly, stronger reactivation of older memories was associated with less accurate retrieval of newer memories, slower mnemonic decisions, and increased activity in anterior cingulate cortex. Finally, greater activity in the inferior frontal gyrus during the encoding of newer memories (memory updating) predicted lower competition in ventral temporal cortex during subsequent retrieval. Together, these results provide novel insight into how older memories compete with newer memories and specify neural mechanisms that allow competition to be overcome and memories to be updated.",
author = "Kuhl, {Brice A.} and Bainbridge, {Wilma A.} and Chun, {Marvin M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5846-11.2012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "3453--3461",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neural reactivation reveals mechanisms for updating memory

AU - Kuhl, Brice A.

AU - Bainbridge, Wilma A.

AU - Chun, Marvin M.

PY - 2012/3/7

Y1 - 2012/3/7

N2 - Our ability to remember new information is often compromised by competition from prior learning, leading to many instances of forgetting. One of the challenges in studying why these lapses occur and how they can be prevented is that it is methodologically difficult to "see" competition between memories as it occurs. Here, we used multi-voxel pattern analysis of human fMRI data to measure the neural reactivation of both older (competing) and newer (target) memories during individual attempts to retrieve newer memories. Of central interest was the following: (1) whether older memories were reactivated during retrieval of newer memories; (2) how reactivation of older memories related to retrieval performance; and (3) whether neural mechanisms engaged during the encoding of newer memories were predictive of neural competition experienced during retrieval. Our results indicate that older and newer visual memories were often simultaneously reactivated in ventral temporal cortex- even when target memories were successfully retrieved. Importantly, stronger reactivation of older memories was associated with less accurate retrieval of newer memories, slower mnemonic decisions, and increased activity in anterior cingulate cortex. Finally, greater activity in the inferior frontal gyrus during the encoding of newer memories (memory updating) predicted lower competition in ventral temporal cortex during subsequent retrieval. Together, these results provide novel insight into how older memories compete with newer memories and specify neural mechanisms that allow competition to be overcome and memories to be updated.

AB - Our ability to remember new information is often compromised by competition from prior learning, leading to many instances of forgetting. One of the challenges in studying why these lapses occur and how they can be prevented is that it is methodologically difficult to "see" competition between memories as it occurs. Here, we used multi-voxel pattern analysis of human fMRI data to measure the neural reactivation of both older (competing) and newer (target) memories during individual attempts to retrieve newer memories. Of central interest was the following: (1) whether older memories were reactivated during retrieval of newer memories; (2) how reactivation of older memories related to retrieval performance; and (3) whether neural mechanisms engaged during the encoding of newer memories were predictive of neural competition experienced during retrieval. Our results indicate that older and newer visual memories were often simultaneously reactivated in ventral temporal cortex- even when target memories were successfully retrieved. Importantly, stronger reactivation of older memories was associated with less accurate retrieval of newer memories, slower mnemonic decisions, and increased activity in anterior cingulate cortex. Finally, greater activity in the inferior frontal gyrus during the encoding of newer memories (memory updating) predicted lower competition in ventral temporal cortex during subsequent retrieval. Together, these results provide novel insight into how older memories compete with newer memories and specify neural mechanisms that allow competition to be overcome and memories to be updated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857848699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857848699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5846-11.2012

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5846-11.2012

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 3453

EP - 3461

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 10

ER -