Network effects and social inequality

Paul Dimaggio, Filiz Garip

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    Students of social inequality have noted the presence of mechanisms militating toward cumulative advantage and increasing inequality. Social scientists have established that individuals' choices are influenced by those of their network peers in many social domains. We suggest that the ubiquity of network effects and tendencies toward cumulative advantage are related. Inequality is exacerbated when effects of individual differences are multiplied by social networks: when persons must decide whether to adopt beneficial practices; when network externalities, social learning, or normative pressures influence adoption decisions; and when networks are homophilous with respect to individual characteristics that predict such decisions. We review evidence from literatures on network effects on technology, labor markets, education, demography, and health; identify several mechanisms through which networks may generate higher levels of inequality than one would expect based on differences in initial endowments alone; consider cases in which network effects may ameliorate inequality; and describe research priorities.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)93-118
    Number of pages26
    JournalAnnual Review of Sociology
    Volume38
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Aug 2012

    Fingerprint

    social inequality
    social learning
    demography
    social scientist
    social network
    labor market
    human being
    health
    evidence
    education
    student

    Keywords

    • Cumulative advantage
    • Diffusion
    • Externalities
    • Homophily
    • Spillovers
    • Threshold models

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Network effects and social inequality. / Dimaggio, Paul; Garip, Filiz.

    In: Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 38, 08.2012, p. 93-118.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Dimaggio, Paul ; Garip, Filiz. / Network effects and social inequality. In: Annual Review of Sociology. 2012 ; Vol. 38. pp. 93-118.
    @article{5bfb3e2f4b6f40aea1e70e347528e50f,
    title = "Network effects and social inequality",
    abstract = "Students of social inequality have noted the presence of mechanisms militating toward cumulative advantage and increasing inequality. Social scientists have established that individuals' choices are influenced by those of their network peers in many social domains. We suggest that the ubiquity of network effects and tendencies toward cumulative advantage are related. Inequality is exacerbated when effects of individual differences are multiplied by social networks: when persons must decide whether to adopt beneficial practices; when network externalities, social learning, or normative pressures influence adoption decisions; and when networks are homophilous with respect to individual characteristics that predict such decisions. We review evidence from literatures on network effects on technology, labor markets, education, demography, and health; identify several mechanisms through which networks may generate higher levels of inequality than one would expect based on differences in initial endowments alone; consider cases in which network effects may ameliorate inequality; and describe research priorities.",
    keywords = "Cumulative advantage, Diffusion, Externalities, Homophily, Spillovers, Threshold models",
    author = "Paul Dimaggio and Filiz Garip",
    year = "2012",
    month = "8",
    doi = "10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102545",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "38",
    pages = "93--118",
    journal = "Annual Review of Sociology",
    issn = "0360-0572",
    publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Network effects and social inequality

    AU - Dimaggio, Paul

    AU - Garip, Filiz

    PY - 2012/8

    Y1 - 2012/8

    N2 - Students of social inequality have noted the presence of mechanisms militating toward cumulative advantage and increasing inequality. Social scientists have established that individuals' choices are influenced by those of their network peers in many social domains. We suggest that the ubiquity of network effects and tendencies toward cumulative advantage are related. Inequality is exacerbated when effects of individual differences are multiplied by social networks: when persons must decide whether to adopt beneficial practices; when network externalities, social learning, or normative pressures influence adoption decisions; and when networks are homophilous with respect to individual characteristics that predict such decisions. We review evidence from literatures on network effects on technology, labor markets, education, demography, and health; identify several mechanisms through which networks may generate higher levels of inequality than one would expect based on differences in initial endowments alone; consider cases in which network effects may ameliorate inequality; and describe research priorities.

    AB - Students of social inequality have noted the presence of mechanisms militating toward cumulative advantage and increasing inequality. Social scientists have established that individuals' choices are influenced by those of their network peers in many social domains. We suggest that the ubiquity of network effects and tendencies toward cumulative advantage are related. Inequality is exacerbated when effects of individual differences are multiplied by social networks: when persons must decide whether to adopt beneficial practices; when network externalities, social learning, or normative pressures influence adoption decisions; and when networks are homophilous with respect to individual characteristics that predict such decisions. We review evidence from literatures on network effects on technology, labor markets, education, demography, and health; identify several mechanisms through which networks may generate higher levels of inequality than one would expect based on differences in initial endowments alone; consider cases in which network effects may ameliorate inequality; and describe research priorities.

    KW - Cumulative advantage

    KW - Diffusion

    KW - Externalities

    KW - Homophily

    KW - Spillovers

    KW - Threshold models

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864199024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864199024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102545

    DO - 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102545

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 38

    SP - 93

    EP - 118

    JO - Annual Review of Sociology

    JF - Annual Review of Sociology

    SN - 0360-0572

    ER -