Neonatal circumcision and pain relief: Current training practices

Cynthia R. Howard, Fred M. Howard, Lynn C. Garfunkel, Elisabeth A. De Blieck, Michael Weitzman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective. We conducted a national survey of pediatric, family practice, and obstetrics and gynecology residency program directors to determine the curriculum content and predominant practices in US training programs with regard to neonatal circumcision and anesthesia/analgesia for the procedure. Methods. Residency directors of accredited programs were surveyed in two mailings of a forced response and short answer survey (response rate: 680/914, 74%; pediatrics 83%; family practice 72%; obstetrics 71%). Results. Pediatric residents were less likely than family practice [odds ratio (OR), 0.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02-0.08] or obstetrical (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.080.23) residents to be taught circumcision. Training and local custom were rated as important determinants of medical responsibility for neonatal circumcision. Pediatric residents training in programs in which community pediatricians perform circumcisions were more likely to learn circumcision (OR, 39.0; 95% CI, 14.3-110.6) as were obstetric residents (OR, 79.0; 95% CI, 22.4-306.4) training in programs in which community obstetricians perform circumcision. In programs that teach circumcision, pediatric (84%; OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7-7.1) and family practice (80%; OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.7-4.2) programs were more likely than obstetric programs (60%) to teach analgesia/ anesthesia techniques to relieve procedural pain. Overall, 26% of programs that taught circumcision failed to provide instruction in anesthesia/analgesia for the procedure. Significant regional variations in training in circumcision and analgesia/anesthesia techniques were noted within and across medical specialties. Conclusions. Residency training standards are not consistent for pediatric, family practice, and obstetrical residents with regard to neonatal circumcision or instruction in analgesia/anesthesia for the procedure. Training with regard to pain relief is clearly inadequate for what remains a common surgical procedure in the United States. Given the overwhelming evidence that neonatal circumcision is painful and the existence of safe and effective anesthesia/analgesia methods, residency training in neonatal circumcision should include instruction in pain relief techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-428
Number of pages6
JournalPediatrics
Volume101
Issue number3 I
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 1998

Fingerprint

Anesthesia and Analgesia
Family Practice
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Pediatrics
Internship and Residency
Pain
Obstetrics
Education
Gynecology
Curriculum
Medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Howard, C. R., Howard, F. M., Garfunkel, L. C., De Blieck, E. A., & Weitzman, M. (1998). Neonatal circumcision and pain relief: Current training practices. Pediatrics, 101(3 I), 423-428. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.101.3.423

Neonatal circumcision and pain relief : Current training practices. / Howard, Cynthia R.; Howard, Fred M.; Garfunkel, Lynn C.; De Blieck, Elisabeth A.; Weitzman, Michael.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 101, No. 3 I, 01.03.1998, p. 423-428.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Howard, CR, Howard, FM, Garfunkel, LC, De Blieck, EA & Weitzman, M 1998, 'Neonatal circumcision and pain relief: Current training practices', Pediatrics, vol. 101, no. 3 I, pp. 423-428. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.101.3.423
Howard, Cynthia R. ; Howard, Fred M. ; Garfunkel, Lynn C. ; De Blieck, Elisabeth A. ; Weitzman, Michael. / Neonatal circumcision and pain relief : Current training practices. In: Pediatrics. 1998 ; Vol. 101, No. 3 I. pp. 423-428.
@article{71af63eabe544410855c16d0fb5d1be2,
title = "Neonatal circumcision and pain relief: Current training practices",
abstract = "Objective. We conducted a national survey of pediatric, family practice, and obstetrics and gynecology residency program directors to determine the curriculum content and predominant practices in US training programs with regard to neonatal circumcision and anesthesia/analgesia for the procedure. Methods. Residency directors of accredited programs were surveyed in two mailings of a forced response and short answer survey (response rate: 680/914, 74{\%}; pediatrics 83{\%}; family practice 72{\%}; obstetrics 71{\%}). Results. Pediatric residents were less likely than family practice [odds ratio (OR), 0.04; 95{\%} confidence interval (CI), 0.02-0.08] or obstetrical (OR, 0.14; 95{\%} CI, 0.080.23) residents to be taught circumcision. Training and local custom were rated as important determinants of medical responsibility for neonatal circumcision. Pediatric residents training in programs in which community pediatricians perform circumcisions were more likely to learn circumcision (OR, 39.0; 95{\%} CI, 14.3-110.6) as were obstetric residents (OR, 79.0; 95{\%} CI, 22.4-306.4) training in programs in which community obstetricians perform circumcision. In programs that teach circumcision, pediatric (84{\%}; OR, 3.4; 95{\%} CI, 1.7-7.1) and family practice (80{\%}; OR, 2.7; 95{\%} CI, 1.7-4.2) programs were more likely than obstetric programs (60{\%}) to teach analgesia/ anesthesia techniques to relieve procedural pain. Overall, 26{\%} of programs that taught circumcision failed to provide instruction in anesthesia/analgesia for the procedure. Significant regional variations in training in circumcision and analgesia/anesthesia techniques were noted within and across medical specialties. Conclusions. Residency training standards are not consistent for pediatric, family practice, and obstetrical residents with regard to neonatal circumcision or instruction in analgesia/anesthesia for the procedure. Training with regard to pain relief is clearly inadequate for what remains a common surgical procedure in the United States. Given the overwhelming evidence that neonatal circumcision is painful and the existence of safe and effective anesthesia/analgesia methods, residency training in neonatal circumcision should include instruction in pain relief techniques.",
author = "Howard, {Cynthia R.} and Howard, {Fred M.} and Garfunkel, {Lynn C.} and {De Blieck}, {Elisabeth A.} and Michael Weitzman",
year = "1998",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1542/peds.101.3.423",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "423--428",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "3 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neonatal circumcision and pain relief

T2 - Current training practices

AU - Howard, Cynthia R.

AU - Howard, Fred M.

AU - Garfunkel, Lynn C.

AU - De Blieck, Elisabeth A.

AU - Weitzman, Michael

PY - 1998/3/1

Y1 - 1998/3/1

N2 - Objective. We conducted a national survey of pediatric, family practice, and obstetrics and gynecology residency program directors to determine the curriculum content and predominant practices in US training programs with regard to neonatal circumcision and anesthesia/analgesia for the procedure. Methods. Residency directors of accredited programs were surveyed in two mailings of a forced response and short answer survey (response rate: 680/914, 74%; pediatrics 83%; family practice 72%; obstetrics 71%). Results. Pediatric residents were less likely than family practice [odds ratio (OR), 0.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02-0.08] or obstetrical (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.080.23) residents to be taught circumcision. Training and local custom were rated as important determinants of medical responsibility for neonatal circumcision. Pediatric residents training in programs in which community pediatricians perform circumcisions were more likely to learn circumcision (OR, 39.0; 95% CI, 14.3-110.6) as were obstetric residents (OR, 79.0; 95% CI, 22.4-306.4) training in programs in which community obstetricians perform circumcision. In programs that teach circumcision, pediatric (84%; OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7-7.1) and family practice (80%; OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.7-4.2) programs were more likely than obstetric programs (60%) to teach analgesia/ anesthesia techniques to relieve procedural pain. Overall, 26% of programs that taught circumcision failed to provide instruction in anesthesia/analgesia for the procedure. Significant regional variations in training in circumcision and analgesia/anesthesia techniques were noted within and across medical specialties. Conclusions. Residency training standards are not consistent for pediatric, family practice, and obstetrical residents with regard to neonatal circumcision or instruction in analgesia/anesthesia for the procedure. Training with regard to pain relief is clearly inadequate for what remains a common surgical procedure in the United States. Given the overwhelming evidence that neonatal circumcision is painful and the existence of safe and effective anesthesia/analgesia methods, residency training in neonatal circumcision should include instruction in pain relief techniques.

AB - Objective. We conducted a national survey of pediatric, family practice, and obstetrics and gynecology residency program directors to determine the curriculum content and predominant practices in US training programs with regard to neonatal circumcision and anesthesia/analgesia for the procedure. Methods. Residency directors of accredited programs were surveyed in two mailings of a forced response and short answer survey (response rate: 680/914, 74%; pediatrics 83%; family practice 72%; obstetrics 71%). Results. Pediatric residents were less likely than family practice [odds ratio (OR), 0.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02-0.08] or obstetrical (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.080.23) residents to be taught circumcision. Training and local custom were rated as important determinants of medical responsibility for neonatal circumcision. Pediatric residents training in programs in which community pediatricians perform circumcisions were more likely to learn circumcision (OR, 39.0; 95% CI, 14.3-110.6) as were obstetric residents (OR, 79.0; 95% CI, 22.4-306.4) training in programs in which community obstetricians perform circumcision. In programs that teach circumcision, pediatric (84%; OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7-7.1) and family practice (80%; OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.7-4.2) programs were more likely than obstetric programs (60%) to teach analgesia/ anesthesia techniques to relieve procedural pain. Overall, 26% of programs that taught circumcision failed to provide instruction in anesthesia/analgesia for the procedure. Significant regional variations in training in circumcision and analgesia/anesthesia techniques were noted within and across medical specialties. Conclusions. Residency training standards are not consistent for pediatric, family practice, and obstetrical residents with regard to neonatal circumcision or instruction in analgesia/anesthesia for the procedure. Training with regard to pain relief is clearly inadequate for what remains a common surgical procedure in the United States. Given the overwhelming evidence that neonatal circumcision is painful and the existence of safe and effective anesthesia/analgesia methods, residency training in neonatal circumcision should include instruction in pain relief techniques.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031881156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031881156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.101.3.423

DO - 10.1542/peds.101.3.423

M3 - Article

C2 - 9481008

AN - SCOPUS:0031881156

VL - 101

SP - 423

EP - 428

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 3 I

ER -