Neoliberal Ideology and the Justification of Inequality in Capitalist Societies

Why Social and Economic Dimensions of Ideology Are Intertwined

Flavio Azevedo, John Jost, Tobias Rothmund, Joanna Sterling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article we analyze data from high-quality surveys conducted in the United States and the United Kingdom that included multiple symbolic and operational measures of political ideology and psychological orientations. Our overarching goal is to elucidate the nature of conceptual and empirical connections between neoliberalism and social conservatism. In so doing, we revisit three major questions about public opinion in neoliberal societies: (1) Are ordinary citizens “innocent” of ideology? (2) Are social and economic dimensions of ideology structurally and functionally independent? (3) Are support for laissez-faire capitalism and opposition to welfare—hallmarks of neoliberal ideology—unrelated or negatively related to authoritarianism? In contrast to previous investigations relying upon fewer and poorer measures, we found that ordinary citizens do indeed hold coherent political attitudes, and their attitudes about social and economic issues are closely aligned. For instance, we observed that for five previously published ideological instruments, social and economic attitudes were robustly correlated in two large U.S. samples (with rs ranging from.40 to.69)—for respondents who were relatively low (.31 ≤ r ≤.60) as well as high in political sophistication (.50 ≤ r ≤.77). Contradicting prior claims, we found no evidence that support for the free market was negatively associated with authoritarianism for any group of respondents or any measure of authoritarianism. On the contrary, economic conservatism and the endorsement of neoliberal attitudes were strongly associated with right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, economic system justification, and gender-specific system justification (with rs ranging from.53 to.76). We conclude that the political belief systems of ordinary citizens are coherently organized around support for versus opposition to both social and economic forms of inequality in contemporary capitalist societies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Social Issues
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

authoritarianism
capitalist society
ideology
economics
conservatism
citizen
opposition
social attitude
political ideology
political attitude
economic system
neoliberalism
political system
public opinion
gender
market
society
evidence
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Neoliberal Ideology and the Justification of Inequality in Capitalist Societies : Why Social and Economic Dimensions of Ideology Are Intertwined. / Azevedo, Flavio; Jost, John; Rothmund, Tobias; Sterling, Joanna.

In: Journal of Social Issues, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{db06d3b76c364ef68073c654a771e7b5,
title = "Neoliberal Ideology and the Justification of Inequality in Capitalist Societies: Why Social and Economic Dimensions of Ideology Are Intertwined",
abstract = "In this article we analyze data from high-quality surveys conducted in the United States and the United Kingdom that included multiple symbolic and operational measures of political ideology and psychological orientations. Our overarching goal is to elucidate the nature of conceptual and empirical connections between neoliberalism and social conservatism. In so doing, we revisit three major questions about public opinion in neoliberal societies: (1) Are ordinary citizens “innocent” of ideology? (2) Are social and economic dimensions of ideology structurally and functionally independent? (3) Are support for laissez-faire capitalism and opposition to welfare—hallmarks of neoliberal ideology—unrelated or negatively related to authoritarianism? In contrast to previous investigations relying upon fewer and poorer measures, we found that ordinary citizens do indeed hold coherent political attitudes, and their attitudes about social and economic issues are closely aligned. For instance, we observed that for five previously published ideological instruments, social and economic attitudes were robustly correlated in two large U.S. samples (with rs ranging from.40 to.69)—for respondents who were relatively low (.31 ≤ r ≤.60) as well as high in political sophistication (.50 ≤ r ≤.77). Contradicting prior claims, we found no evidence that support for the free market was negatively associated with authoritarianism for any group of respondents or any measure of authoritarianism. On the contrary, economic conservatism and the endorsement of neoliberal attitudes were strongly associated with right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, economic system justification, and gender-specific system justification (with rs ranging from.53 to.76). We conclude that the political belief systems of ordinary citizens are coherently organized around support for versus opposition to both social and economic forms of inequality in contemporary capitalist societies.",
author = "Flavio Azevedo and John Jost and Tobias Rothmund and Joanna Sterling",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/josi.12310",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Social Issues",
issn = "0022-4537",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neoliberal Ideology and the Justification of Inequality in Capitalist Societies

T2 - Why Social and Economic Dimensions of Ideology Are Intertwined

AU - Azevedo, Flavio

AU - Jost, John

AU - Rothmund, Tobias

AU - Sterling, Joanna

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - In this article we analyze data from high-quality surveys conducted in the United States and the United Kingdom that included multiple symbolic and operational measures of political ideology and psychological orientations. Our overarching goal is to elucidate the nature of conceptual and empirical connections between neoliberalism and social conservatism. In so doing, we revisit three major questions about public opinion in neoliberal societies: (1) Are ordinary citizens “innocent” of ideology? (2) Are social and economic dimensions of ideology structurally and functionally independent? (3) Are support for laissez-faire capitalism and opposition to welfare—hallmarks of neoliberal ideology—unrelated or negatively related to authoritarianism? In contrast to previous investigations relying upon fewer and poorer measures, we found that ordinary citizens do indeed hold coherent political attitudes, and their attitudes about social and economic issues are closely aligned. For instance, we observed that for five previously published ideological instruments, social and economic attitudes were robustly correlated in two large U.S. samples (with rs ranging from.40 to.69)—for respondents who were relatively low (.31 ≤ r ≤.60) as well as high in political sophistication (.50 ≤ r ≤.77). Contradicting prior claims, we found no evidence that support for the free market was negatively associated with authoritarianism for any group of respondents or any measure of authoritarianism. On the contrary, economic conservatism and the endorsement of neoliberal attitudes were strongly associated with right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, economic system justification, and gender-specific system justification (with rs ranging from.53 to.76). We conclude that the political belief systems of ordinary citizens are coherently organized around support for versus opposition to both social and economic forms of inequality in contemporary capitalist societies.

AB - In this article we analyze data from high-quality surveys conducted in the United States and the United Kingdom that included multiple symbolic and operational measures of political ideology and psychological orientations. Our overarching goal is to elucidate the nature of conceptual and empirical connections between neoliberalism and social conservatism. In so doing, we revisit three major questions about public opinion in neoliberal societies: (1) Are ordinary citizens “innocent” of ideology? (2) Are social and economic dimensions of ideology structurally and functionally independent? (3) Are support for laissez-faire capitalism and opposition to welfare—hallmarks of neoliberal ideology—unrelated or negatively related to authoritarianism? In contrast to previous investigations relying upon fewer and poorer measures, we found that ordinary citizens do indeed hold coherent political attitudes, and their attitudes about social and economic issues are closely aligned. For instance, we observed that for five previously published ideological instruments, social and economic attitudes were robustly correlated in two large U.S. samples (with rs ranging from.40 to.69)—for respondents who were relatively low (.31 ≤ r ≤.60) as well as high in political sophistication (.50 ≤ r ≤.77). Contradicting prior claims, we found no evidence that support for the free market was negatively associated with authoritarianism for any group of respondents or any measure of authoritarianism. On the contrary, economic conservatism and the endorsement of neoliberal attitudes were strongly associated with right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, economic system justification, and gender-specific system justification (with rs ranging from.53 to.76). We conclude that the political belief systems of ordinary citizens are coherently organized around support for versus opposition to both social and economic forms of inequality in contemporary capitalist societies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061996406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061996406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/josi.12310

DO - 10.1111/josi.12310

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Social Issues

JF - Journal of Social Issues

SN - 0022-4537

ER -