Neither ideologues nor agnostics: Alternative voters’ belief system in an age of Partisan politics

Delia Baldassarri, Amir Goldberg

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    How do Americans organize their political beliefs? This article argues that party polarization and the growing prominence of moral issues in recent decades have catalyzed different responses by different groups of Americans. The article investigates systematic heterogeneity in the organization of political attitudes using relational class analysis, a graph-based method for detecting multiple patterns of opinion in survey data. Three subpopulations, each characterized by a distinctive way of organizing its political beliefs, are identified: ideologues, whose political attitudes strongly align with either liberal or conservative categories; alternatives, who are instead morally conservative but economically liberal, or vice versa; and agnostics, who exhibit weak associations between political beliefs. Individuals’ sociodemographic profiles, particularly their income, education, and religiosity, lie at the core of the different ways in which they understand politics. Results show that while ideologues have gone through a process of issue alignment, alternatives have grown increasingly apart from the political agendas of both parties. The conflictual presence of conservative and liberal preferences has often been resolved by alternative voters in favor of the Republican Party.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)45-95
    Number of pages51
    JournalAmerican Journal of Sociology
    Volume120
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Politics
    political attitude
    politics
    Republican Party
    political agenda
    polarization
    Organizations
    Education
    income
    organization
    education
    Group

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Medicine(all)

    Cite this

    Neither ideologues nor agnostics : Alternative voters’ belief system in an age of Partisan politics. / Baldassarri, Delia; Goldberg, Amir.

    In: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 120, No. 1, 2014, p. 45-95.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{d3fac42987e14bb8a61847c1ce9de69b,
    title = "Neither ideologues nor agnostics: Alternative voters’ belief system in an age of Partisan politics",
    abstract = "How do Americans organize their political beliefs? This article argues that party polarization and the growing prominence of moral issues in recent decades have catalyzed different responses by different groups of Americans. The article investigates systematic heterogeneity in the organization of political attitudes using relational class analysis, a graph-based method for detecting multiple patterns of opinion in survey data. Three subpopulations, each characterized by a distinctive way of organizing its political beliefs, are identified: ideologues, whose political attitudes strongly align with either liberal or conservative categories; alternatives, who are instead morally conservative but economically liberal, or vice versa; and agnostics, who exhibit weak associations between political beliefs. Individuals’ sociodemographic profiles, particularly their income, education, and religiosity, lie at the core of the different ways in which they understand politics. Results show that while ideologues have gone through a process of issue alignment, alternatives have grown increasingly apart from the political agendas of both parties. The conflictual presence of conservative and liberal preferences has often been resolved by alternative voters in favor of the Republican Party.",
    author = "Delia Baldassarri and Amir Goldberg",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1086/676042",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "120",
    pages = "45--95",
    journal = "American Journal of Sociology",
    issn = "0002-9602",
    publisher = "University of Chicago",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Neither ideologues nor agnostics

    T2 - Alternative voters’ belief system in an age of Partisan politics

    AU - Baldassarri, Delia

    AU - Goldberg, Amir

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - How do Americans organize their political beliefs? This article argues that party polarization and the growing prominence of moral issues in recent decades have catalyzed different responses by different groups of Americans. The article investigates systematic heterogeneity in the organization of political attitudes using relational class analysis, a graph-based method for detecting multiple patterns of opinion in survey data. Three subpopulations, each characterized by a distinctive way of organizing its political beliefs, are identified: ideologues, whose political attitudes strongly align with either liberal or conservative categories; alternatives, who are instead morally conservative but economically liberal, or vice versa; and agnostics, who exhibit weak associations between political beliefs. Individuals’ sociodemographic profiles, particularly their income, education, and religiosity, lie at the core of the different ways in which they understand politics. Results show that while ideologues have gone through a process of issue alignment, alternatives have grown increasingly apart from the political agendas of both parties. The conflictual presence of conservative and liberal preferences has often been resolved by alternative voters in favor of the Republican Party.

    AB - How do Americans organize their political beliefs? This article argues that party polarization and the growing prominence of moral issues in recent decades have catalyzed different responses by different groups of Americans. The article investigates systematic heterogeneity in the organization of political attitudes using relational class analysis, a graph-based method for detecting multiple patterns of opinion in survey data. Three subpopulations, each characterized by a distinctive way of organizing its political beliefs, are identified: ideologues, whose political attitudes strongly align with either liberal or conservative categories; alternatives, who are instead morally conservative but economically liberal, or vice versa; and agnostics, who exhibit weak associations between political beliefs. Individuals’ sociodemographic profiles, particularly their income, education, and religiosity, lie at the core of the different ways in which they understand politics. Results show that while ideologues have gone through a process of issue alignment, alternatives have grown increasingly apart from the political agendas of both parties. The conflictual presence of conservative and liberal preferences has often been resolved by alternative voters in favor of the Republican Party.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925285612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925285612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1086/676042

    DO - 10.1086/676042

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 25705780

    AN - SCOPUS:84925285612

    VL - 120

    SP - 45

    EP - 95

    JO - American Journal of Sociology

    JF - American Journal of Sociology

    SN - 0002-9602

    IS - 1

    ER -