Negotiating who “owns” penobscot culture

Jane Anderson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Museums, archives, and libraries are important places of re-connection and re-animation for Indigenous peoples and communities. Ethnographic collections held within these sites tell very particular histories about the colonial experience, including how Native culture was transformed into forms of exclusive property through practices of research, collecting, and documentation. The Penobscot Nation is one of many tribes grappling with the reality that it is the legal owner neither of the material culture held in institutions nor of the representations of culture, the photographs, manuscripts, and other audio visual materials that were collected by researchers over the long period of colonial engagement. As non-owners of materials that record their images, voices, histories, and ideas, the Penobscot Nation has to negotiate against the weight of powerful legal orders that reflect colonial idioms of control and authority over Native peoples and the representations of their cultures. This article explores the range of strategies that the Penobscot Nation has developed to maneuver around the legacies of legal and social exclusions in access to, and therefore decision-making about, the future uses of these cultural materials.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)267-305
    Number of pages39
    JournalAnthropological Quarterly
    Volume91
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

    Fingerprint

    visual material
    legal order
    history
    documentation
    museum
    ethnic group
    exclusion
    decision making
    Colonies
    community
    experience
    History
    Decision Making
    Authority
    Indigenous Communities
    Native People
    Animation
    Idioms
    Material Culture
    Social Exclusion

    Keywords

    • Agreements
    • Ethnographic collections
    • Legal exclusion
    • MoUs
    • Museums
    • Negotiation
    • Property
    • Sovereignty
    • Strategic maneuvering

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Anthropology
    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

    Cite this

    Negotiating who “owns” penobscot culture. / Anderson, Jane.

    In: Anthropological Quarterly, Vol. 91, No. 1, 01.12.2018, p. 267-305.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Anderson, Jane. / Negotiating who “owns” penobscot culture. In: Anthropological Quarterly. 2018 ; Vol. 91, No. 1. pp. 267-305.
    @article{1661aba228f14a4dbea46900928126e3,
    title = "Negotiating who “owns” penobscot culture",
    abstract = "Museums, archives, and libraries are important places of re-connection and re-animation for Indigenous peoples and communities. Ethnographic collections held within these sites tell very particular histories about the colonial experience, including how Native culture was transformed into forms of exclusive property through practices of research, collecting, and documentation. The Penobscot Nation is one of many tribes grappling with the reality that it is the legal owner neither of the material culture held in institutions nor of the representations of culture, the photographs, manuscripts, and other audio visual materials that were collected by researchers over the long period of colonial engagement. As non-owners of materials that record their images, voices, histories, and ideas, the Penobscot Nation has to negotiate against the weight of powerful legal orders that reflect colonial idioms of control and authority over Native peoples and the representations of their cultures. This article explores the range of strategies that the Penobscot Nation has developed to maneuver around the legacies of legal and social exclusions in access to, and therefore decision-making about, the future uses of these cultural materials.",
    keywords = "Agreements, Ethnographic collections, Legal exclusion, MoUs, Museums, Negotiation, Property, Sovereignty, Strategic maneuvering",
    author = "Jane Anderson",
    year = "2018",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1353/anq.2018.0008",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "91",
    pages = "267--305",
    journal = "Anthropological Quarterly",
    issn = "0003-5491",
    publisher = "Institute for Ethnographic Research",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Negotiating who “owns” penobscot culture

    AU - Anderson, Jane

    PY - 2018/12/1

    Y1 - 2018/12/1

    N2 - Museums, archives, and libraries are important places of re-connection and re-animation for Indigenous peoples and communities. Ethnographic collections held within these sites tell very particular histories about the colonial experience, including how Native culture was transformed into forms of exclusive property through practices of research, collecting, and documentation. The Penobscot Nation is one of many tribes grappling with the reality that it is the legal owner neither of the material culture held in institutions nor of the representations of culture, the photographs, manuscripts, and other audio visual materials that were collected by researchers over the long period of colonial engagement. As non-owners of materials that record their images, voices, histories, and ideas, the Penobscot Nation has to negotiate against the weight of powerful legal orders that reflect colonial idioms of control and authority over Native peoples and the representations of their cultures. This article explores the range of strategies that the Penobscot Nation has developed to maneuver around the legacies of legal and social exclusions in access to, and therefore decision-making about, the future uses of these cultural materials.

    AB - Museums, archives, and libraries are important places of re-connection and re-animation for Indigenous peoples and communities. Ethnographic collections held within these sites tell very particular histories about the colonial experience, including how Native culture was transformed into forms of exclusive property through practices of research, collecting, and documentation. The Penobscot Nation is one of many tribes grappling with the reality that it is the legal owner neither of the material culture held in institutions nor of the representations of culture, the photographs, manuscripts, and other audio visual materials that were collected by researchers over the long period of colonial engagement. As non-owners of materials that record their images, voices, histories, and ideas, the Penobscot Nation has to negotiate against the weight of powerful legal orders that reflect colonial idioms of control and authority over Native peoples and the representations of their cultures. This article explores the range of strategies that the Penobscot Nation has developed to maneuver around the legacies of legal and social exclusions in access to, and therefore decision-making about, the future uses of these cultural materials.

    KW - Agreements

    KW - Ethnographic collections

    KW - Legal exclusion

    KW - MoUs

    KW - Museums

    KW - Negotiation

    KW - Property

    KW - Sovereignty

    KW - Strategic maneuvering

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047855984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047855984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1353/anq.2018.0008

    DO - 10.1353/anq.2018.0008

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85047855984

    VL - 91

    SP - 267

    EP - 305

    JO - Anthropological Quarterly

    JF - Anthropological Quarterly

    SN - 0003-5491

    IS - 1

    ER -